Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 268

A-REITS are looking at M&A activity again

The 2018 financial year, like the previous few years, turned out to be a security picker's market in the listed property, or A-REIT, sector. Performance varied across the 31 stocks in the S&P/ASX300 A-REIT Index, ranging from Propertylink up 34.4% to Stockland Group down 3.6%.

Even within sectors, the performance variation was wide. Among the retail A-REITs, SCA Property Group took line honors with a total return of 18.4% while Aventus, the specialist large format retail centre owner, underperformed with a total return of just 4.7%. It was a similar story in the office A-REITs, GDI Property Group returned 33.8%, while Dexus returned just 7.5%. Among the diversified A-REITs, Abacus returned 25.5% and Stockland negative 3.6%.

Overall, the S&P/ASX300 A-REIT Accumulation Index finished FY18 on a high, returning 13.2%, in line with the broader equities market, with the last three months delivering a strong return of 9.8%. The strength in the A-REIT sector coincided with rising concerns of an escalation in a trade war between United States and China, political tensions in Europe, a pullback in US bond yields and the flattening of the Australian yield curve.

Office and industrial up, residential steady

In the current reporting season, valuations are up and earnings guidance ranges have narrowed towards the upper end supported by solid rental growth across most office and industrial markets. Notwithstanding the broader market concern about the weakening residential sector, strong settlements were recorded across the Stockland, Mirvac and Ingenia residential portfolios.

Darren Steinberg, CEO of Dexus, was on the money when he recently said:

“It is pleasing to see higher market rents being reflected in our latest round of valuations across many of our assets. In addition, valuers have taken into account recent transactions where there has been no softening in the underlying investment demand for good quality office and industrial properties which continue to attract a variety of domestic and offshore buyers.”

Looking ahead, we expect corporate activity to remain elevated reflecting many A-REITs' inability to acquire assets in the direct market at reasonable prices. Finding bargains is next to impossible at this point in the cycle, and to grow, A-REITs are now looking to M&A. And we’ve seen this play before. Back in 1999-2000 and again in 2006-2007, M&As became defining factors in a relative hot property market.

Also, the lower Australian dollar is making the valuations of A-REITs increasingly attractive to foreign acquirers (note the Unibail-Rodamco acquisition of Westfield Group, Blackstone’s bid for Investa Office Fund, and Brookfield and Hometown’s fight for Gateway Lifestyle).

A-REITs trading at the smallest premiums or discounts to NTA will be most prone to being merged or taken private.

Overall, we expect the A-REIT sector to deliver relatively attractive returns given the continued low domestic interest rate environment. The two wildcards are the impact of more M&A activity and A-REITs, like interest rate sensitive sectors, being susceptible in the short term, to any major sell-off in global bond markets.

A-REITs owned by asset allocators

Unfortunately, short-term volatility is now a permanent feature of the A-REIT market. With more of the A-REITs being owned by general equity funds, hedge funds and global investors, the sector is more susceptible to the gyrations of these investors, who move in and out of the sector, at a whim. In January and February 2018, the A-REIT sector returned negative 3.2% and negative 3.3% respectively, as concerns about rising global inflation pushed global bond yields higher. Fast forward to May and June, when concerns about rising bond yields abated, the A-REIT sector rallied, with returns of 3.0% in May and 2.3% in June.

In such an environment, as an active manager that doesn’t follow the weighting of each A-REIT security in the Index, we favour those stocks with exposure to the social infrastructure and specialised property sub-sectors, selected real estate developers and managers that have growing funds management platforms. We also like securities with quality management and relatively attractive yields that have the ability to actively manage their portfolios to drive income growth. Not all A-REITs will perform the same.


Winston Sammat is the Managing Director of the Folkestone Maxim A-REIT Securities Fund. Folkestone is a sponsor of Cuffelinks.

For more articles and papers from Folkestone, please click here.



Listed property headlines disguise full story

Focus on quality yield, not near-term income

State of play in listed real estate


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.