Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 293

4 lessons from Marks on protecting capital

“You can’t predict. You can prepare.” Howard Marks

It’s easy for investors to be complacent about risk when equity markets are strong. Numerous recent company downgrades amidst a nervous market have reinforced the need for investors to prioritise capital protection. This article is guided by the words of Howard Marks, Co-Chairman of Oaktree Capital Management to explore how to think about capital protection. While it is near impossible to never lose any money, there are ways to limit the risk of permanent capital loss.

Lesson 1

“Investment risk comes primarily from too-high prices, and too-high prices often come from excessive optimism and inadequate skepticism and risk aversion.” Howard Marks

Watch out for over-optimistic and expanding company valuation multiples when fundamentals remain the same. It may be a signal that the market is paying too much. Stocks trading on high multiples tend to price in optimistic future business conditions and growth expectations. Whilst, at times, high multiple valuations can be justified, this may become an issue when the market gets overly exuberant. At some point in time a correction is likely to occur.

There are generally two ways high multiple stocks can de-rate:

1. The multiple the market is willing to pay suddenly falls

When equity markets are driven by emotion, sharp corrections can become more likely as the market in aggregate becomes more expensive. Sentiment can quickly move away from exuberance to a state of fear, often driven by macroeconomic uncertainty.  A lot of heat was taken out of the market during the final quarter of 2018, with the S&P/ASX300 market multiple dropping 10% from trading on about 16x to 14.5x. In these times, higher multiple stocks tend to de-rate more than lower multiple stocks as expectations taper. As a broad example, the S&P/ASX200 Information Technology index multiple fell 15% from 34x to 29x over the December quarter, de-rating 50% more than the wider market.

2. Underlying earnings of the business are lower than the market expects

Here both the multiple on which the company is valued as well as the underlying earnings per share of that company can take a hit. Take Costa Group (ASX:CGC) as an example. Until recently, this agricultural business was optimistically trading on a 28x forward PE multiple. Costa is now trading roughly 30% lower on 20x since announcing earnings next year would be flat. So most of the 40% fall in share price on the day of the announcement was attributed to a multiple de-rate, rather than a change in earnings. In this case a circa 10% fall in EPS equaled a 4x larger fall in the company’s share price.

The risk in owning high PE stocks is that the multiple can fall much faster than earnings, and faster than the overall market.

Lesson 2

People who think it can be easy overlook substantial nuance and complexity.” Howard Marks

Whilst a multiple de-rate might cause some pain, on the other hand, there is no guarantee that buying a cheap stock will protect the downside either.

If a stock is trading like there is something bad going on, it may well be. It may be the industry conditions it operates in are poor. It is worth understanding why a stock is cheap before thinking it’s a bargain.

An example of this is iSentia (ASX:ISD), a media monitoring business that once had near-monopoly status and sticky clients. It now faces headwinds from competition and difficulty keeping up with a changing digital age, among other things. Prior to August 2018, ISD was trading on a 10x multiple, yet after downgrading during the same month, the stock lost 65% of its value going from $0.80 to $0.28. An already-cheap multiple became even cheaper, down to 6.6x. A low multiple can mean that the earnings base is actually much lower than expected.

Lesson 3

Most things prove to be cyclical.” Howard Marks

Whether from intensifying competition, waning demand or some other structural headwind, a stock’s earnings may be at risk and investors should accept some movement to the downside or reposition the portfolio accordingly.

Industry headwinds can lead to cyclical recovery situations, but they can also be a source of downside risk. In the current environment of banks tightening their belts and weakness in consumer sentiment, some sectors may be better to avoid in the near term, including banking, property, automotive, aged care, retail and construction.

An example is Japara Healthcare (ASX:JHC), a quality aged care provider with strong return on capital and significant property assets. The announcement of the impending Royal Commission into Aged Care presented a reputational, and potentially, demand-damaging industry headwind that will not abate anytime soon. Since the announcement, the stock has drifted down an additional 17% even before the proceedings commenced.

Companies operating in tough industry conditions can do everything in their power to get ahead but some things are just out of management’s control.

Lesson 4

I believe in many cases, the avoidance of losses and terrible years are more easily achieved than repeated greatness, and thus risk control is more likely to create a solid foundation for a superior long-term track record.” Howard Marks

It can be comforting for an investor to identify downside risk in a stock valuation. In times of market downturn, this can help to avoid severe losses.

One example is Elders (ASX:ELD) which has deep-seated relationships in the Australian agricultural market, and a wide and expanding presence across rural regions. It gives them inherent strategic value. Another is Macquarie Telecom (ASX:MAQ), which has a large amount of earnings security through well-serviced government contracts, which become increasingly sticky over time. Adelaide Brighton's (ASX:ABC) market position and assets are near impossible to replicate from scratch.

Whether it is strategic value, a tangible asset like property, or a high level of earnings security, these traits in companies can provide a level of protection during a downturn.

In conclusion, whilst there are no hard and fast rules or guarantees for avoiding losses, we believe these lessons provide a useful starting point when analysing risk. They help to identify companies that will endure and even benefit through times of economic decline, and ultimately reduce the possibility of permanent capital loss.

 

Rachel Folder is an Investment Analyst at NAOS Asset Management, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This material is provided for general information only and must not be construed as investment advice. It does not take into account the investment objectives of any particular investor. Before making an investment decision, investors should consider obtaining professional investment advice.

 

  •   12 February 2019
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Investing is like water, but what the hell is water?

The market loves growth stocks – until it doesn’t

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.