Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 244

A chat with Chris Cuffe at ‘Women in Super’

“Everyone wants to fix the system, that to me, isn’t broken.” This was Chris Cuffe’s assessment of the default superannuation system at a recent Women in Super lunch held at Sydney’s Doltone House.

At the packed event, the former Chairman of UniSuper and one-time head of Colonial First State shared his views on superannuation and the wider financial services sector in a Q&A style session.

Topics covered included:

Default super system: I’m a convert

Cuffe admitted that if you’d asked him a decade ago, he would have said he was philosophically opposed to the default system, where those who don’t deliberately choose where their super funds will go have them deposited in a predetermined fund. But having been a director of an industry fund for over 10 years, he is now a convert.

“The default system has created monoliths (like UniSuper) which have achieved great economies of scale which have brought costs down significantly, provided very good service to their members, and achieved solid performance.”

Unwinding of vertical integration: the merit of ‘banks just being banks’

When discussing how a number of banks and large financial institutions had acquired an array of different companies, from funds management to financial advice to insurance, Cuffe said he wasn’t surprised to see some of these unwind. According to Cuffe, the customer experience from these services varies significantly and not always in a positive way. The customer experience can depend on returns from investment markets, or the ‘fine print’ of a policy document or underwriting conditions, or the experience of the staff member servicing the customer. Banks have big, delicate brands that need to be carefully protected to maintain trust.

These varying activities do not sit well together, and the profit contributions of non-bank financial services are relatively low compared to banking. Cuffe said that banks slimming down their operations was logical so they can focus on ‘just being banks’.

Internalisation of funds management: consistency is key

Another hot topic was the decision of a growing number of industry funds to internalise funds management in an attempt to deliver further value for members. Cuffe believes this can work for those with the right scale.

“Once you are large enough there is no reason why you cannot employ your own people with the same skill set as external fund managers. It’s about turning a variable cost into a fixed cost … leading to lower costs as the funds continue to grow.”

Past performance is in fact a good indicator of future success

Cuffe holds a common-sense point of view of past performance over long term cycles as an indicator for future success. Many people, particularly regulators, say you should not rely on past performance when making an investment, but it is an important indicator of the skill level of a fund manager.

Should industry funds be compelled to have independent directors?

Cuffe said the issue has never been about independent directors, but more about the skill set. Many industry funds are very large, with billions of dollars under management, thousands of members, complex administration systems, insurance and financial planning services and extensive superannuation laws to comply with. They are some of the largest organisations in Australia. The board of directors should comprise individuals who are experienced in those fields. Such experience is unlikely to be found within the employers/employee representatives of most funds.

Does A.I have a place in financial services?

When thrown a curve-ball question around artificial intelligence, a philosophical Cuffe responded: “We have to ask ourselves – where is the end-game and who will hold the power?

 

Susie Bell is a Partner and General Manager at Honner.

RELATED ARTICLES

Reply to Peter: Why a glide path makes sense, with equities for growth

Five challenges for post-retirement products

Grattan’s Super Savings flawed but essential reading

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.