Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 143

ATO perspective: ‘only’ 2,184 SMSFs have assets over $10 million

Both Chris Jordan, Commissioner of Taxation at the Australian Tax Office (ATO), and Greg Tanzer, Commissioner at the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC), gave an update on compliance and regulatory issues at the SMSF Association National Conference in Adelaide this week.

Jordan’s dominant message was that the tax system will be too complicated if it tries to control a few outliers. He told the conference, “Don’t design the system for the last worst person. You should make it easier for the majority.”

For SMSFs, he put the complaints about high value SMSFs into perspective. In 2015, 2,184 SMSFs had balances over $10 million, but they include up to four members in each fund. Only six funds had balances over $100 million. The ATO has looked closely at each and they are “accidents of history”, often with balances accumulated over 30 years with one or two investments that had done extremely well. There are an additional 994 APRA fund members with over $10 million.

But there are over half a million SMSFs. Do you design a system of regulation for the 99.5% with less than $10 million, or make it complex by focussing on the extremes? With the current contribution limits of $30,000 (or $35,000) concessional or $540,000 non-concessional (using the bring-forward rule), it is difficult to build very large balances now.

Notwithstanding, the ATO does look at out-of-pattern numbers, such as a large increase in income or assets in a particular year. These funds may be studied more closely. The ATO had a particular problem with one fund where the shares were revalued from zero to a large number as soon as the member reached the exempt income age. He said, “Was the investor suddenly striking gold? What were the real numbers?” They also had issues where a company with large franking credits was moved into superannuation giving the member a massive refund of franking credits.

In addressing this balance between over-regulation and compliance, Commissioner Jordan explained the priority of the ATO is to improve confidence and trust in the tax system and “contributing to economic and social wellbeing by fostering willing participation in tax system.”

People are more likely to comply:

  • the easier it is to understand the tax rules, and
  • the more confidence they have in the integrity in the tax system.

Taxpayers are confused by complexity. “If A to C is enough, why do we require everything from A to Z?” The aim is to make guidance specific, adopt better early engagement and try not to take people to court and write lengthy letters.

For SMSFs, his particular focus is on related entity rules, and that the assets of the super fund are not for the trustees to use in any way they wish. For example, some people with gambling habits had written cheques from their funds to cover their habits. The ATO also wants Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangements done properly, and anyone with a problem should contact the ATO rather than waiting to be caught. He wants an “open architecture in communications”.

He is also concerned that some SMSF auditors advertise a $200 cost for an automated online audit. Is it adding any real value? What do they really do for so little, where are they, and what’s it worth? The vast majority of taxpayers and industry professionals want to do the right thing, and the ATO wants to balance the cost of compliance versus oversight. Industry must help sort it out.

Greg Tanzer, ASIC Commissioner, explained how the regulators work closely together, with much better cooperation and communication recently. There are 6,700 registered SMSF auditors, but to be eligible, they need to pass a range of tests including at least 300 hours’ experience of auditing under supervision. This is not basic accounting but verifiable SMSF work. ASIC cancelled about 400 registrations last year for auditors failing to complete the required examinations. SMSF auditor problems include a lack of arms’ length on some transactions and poor quality documentation.

Tanzer emphasised the changes coming to accountants working with SMSFs. Until 30 June 2016, accountants can provide advice on establishing and operating an SMSF under an exemption from licensing requirements. This exemption has now been removed (and accountants always needed an AFSL to provide investment advice). There is an opportunity to apply for a limited licence by 30 June 2016 which includes the relaxation of some education requirements. However, accountants who want to continue to work with SMSFs must apply for a licence by 1 March 2016. It’s a serious application process and it will take a while for ASIC to review. He warned, “If you don’t have a licence after 30 June, you will be acting illegally.”

Accountants can be authorised under another AFSL, or apply for a limited or full licence, or change the business model to only do some bookkeeping. But accountants will no longer be able to advise on establishing or operating SMSFs unless licenced.

In summary, Tanzer added, “SMSFs are a marvellous competitive foil for retail and industry funds.” ASIC strongly supports the choice offered by SMSFs, but trustees need to realise that having their own fund is a weighty responsibility.

 

Graham Hand attended the SMSF Association National Conference courtesy of the Association. These comments are general interpretations and do not address any personal circumstances.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

What are wealth industry regulators thinking about?

Are you paying tax by not starting a super pension?

SMSFs: 8 reasons they are over-spruiked and over-rated

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.