Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 60

Beware Division 293 tax on superannuation contributions

Normally when I write articles, I try to minimise the technical jargon. However, this article is about the new tax on superannuation contributions, commonly referred to as the ‘Division 293 tax’, and I encourage you to use the same terminology.

At a recent meeting of SMSF professionals, there were many reports that clients were complaining about this law after receiving a ‘surprise’ tax assessment from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) requesting payment due in 21 days. Before I explain all the nuts and bolts of this law, let me explain its purpose.

What is a Division 293 tax?

Division 293 tax is an additional 15% tax imposed on relevant concessionally taxed superannuation contributions (referred to as low tax contributions) made to superannuation funds (including SMSFs) by individuals whose income exceeds $300,000.

It has been easy to forget this law. It was originally announced in the 2012 Federal Budget as a “Reduction of the higher tax concession for contributions of very high income earners” and at the time wasn’t actually referred to as the ‘Division 293 tax’. The law did not pass until 28 June 2013 and while the commencement date was backdated to 1 July 2012, assessments only started being issued from January 2014.

The purpose of the law

The average income earner’s marginal income tax rate is 32.5% (excluding the Medicare Levy). Superannuation contributions made for the benefit of the individual are taxed at 15%, effectively giving them a 17.5% tax concession. By contrast, very high income earners pay 45% tax on income over $180,000, effectively giving them a 30% tax concession. Division 293 tax applies an additional 15% tax to certain concessional contributions effectively diluting the 30% concession to 15%, in line with the concessions received by average income earners.

Income and contributions included in the $300,000 threshold

An individual will be liable to pay Division 293 tax if the sum of their income plus their low tax contributions exceeds $300,000. The ATO will use the following information from income tax returns:

  • taxable income (assessable income less deductions)
  • total reportable fringe benefits amounts
  • net financial investment loss
  • net rental property loss
  • amounts on which family trust distribution tax has been paid
  • superannuation lump sum taxed elements with a zero tax rate (because it falls within the low rate cap amount).

These elements are added together (except the superannuation lump sum amount, which is subtracted) to give the income amount.

To calculate an individual’s low taxcontributions, the ATO will use the following information:

  • employer contributed amounts
  • other family and friend contributions
  • assessable foreign fund amounts
  • assessable amounts transferred from reserves
  • notional employer contributions, known as defined benefit contributions, when the fund is a defined benefit superannuation fund.

The above contributions are concessionally taxed within a superannuation fund. For Division 293 tax purposes they are known as low tax contributed amounts, and are equal to the low tax contributed amount minus excess concessional contributions. Therefore, low tax contributions do not include non-concessional contributions and concessional contributions that are subject to excess concessional contributions tax.

Division 293 tax of 15% will be charged on an individual’s concessional contributions above the $300,000 threshold (up to the concessional contribution caps). There are special rules for members of defined benefit superannuation funds, constitutionally protected state higher level office holders, certain Commonwealth justices and temporary residents who departed Australia.

Division 293 tax calculation and assessment

To calculate the Division 293 tax liability, the ATO will:

  1. Add the individual’s income and low tax contributions.
  2. Compare the amount from step 1 to the $300,000 threshold to identify any excess above the threshold.
  3. Compare the low tax contribution amount and the amount from step 2. Take the lesser of the two amounts, which then become the taxable contributions.
  4. Apply a 15% tax rate to the taxable contributions.

The following graphic, taken from the ATO’s website, illustrates how the calculation works. In example 2, the amount of Division 293 tax payable would be $1,500 ($10,000 x 15%).

MR Snip1 020514

MR Snip1 020514

The Division 293 tax notice of assessment will state the total earnings for tax purposes, the taxable contributions and the amount of Division 293 tax that is due and payable by a set date which is generally 21 days after the ATO’s notice of assessment was issued.

Individuals are responsible for paying their Division 293 tax. The following payment options are available:

  • pay the assessed tax out of their own monies
  • pay the assessed tax and then seek reimbursement from their fund, or
  • pass on the notice of assessment to their fund using a release authority to have their fund pay the tax on their behalf.

Using a release authority

Individuals can send a release authority to their superannuation fund or SMSF to have the money released. They can choose to have the entire amount or a partial amount released from one fund, or partial amounts released from a number of funds. To do the latter, photocopies can be made and presented to each superannuation fund, as long as there is an original signature on each photocopy and the total amount noted for release does not exceed the amount of the Division 293 tax. Released amounts can be paid to either the individual or directly to the ATO.

General Interest Charge (GIC)

Regardless of how one chooses to pay the tax, if the whole amount is not paid by the due date (21 days after the notice is issued), a general interest charge will start to accrue.

The ATO acknowledges that where a release authority is used, there may be timing issues as superannuation funds are allowed 30 days to process authorities. In these circumstances, the ATO will take this into account when considering applications for remission of GIC accrued during the superannuation fund’s processing period.

 

Monica Rule worked for the ATO for 28 years and is a specialist SMSF adviser. Monica is running SMSF seminars at the Perth Convention and Exhibition Centre on 7 May 2014.

10 Comments
Rajat
June 20, 2018

Hi Monica, if the amount above the threshold is less than the amount of low-tax contributions, does that imply any additional tax deductions (eg last-minute charitable donations) effectively receive a 62% deduction? (ie the donation avoids 45% income tax rate + 2% Medicare levy + 15% Div 293)

Rob
October 20, 2017

Early in 2017 I was made redundant from a company with over 30 years service.
This payment put my taxable income at over $300,000.
My return was completed and assessed, I thought finalised, until 3 months later I received a further assessment under section 293.
Apparently redundancy payments attract no concession from this section.
It would seem this is an area not considered when legislated.
I am now retired, attempting to be self funded with no government support mainly due to my termination payment, hopefully no more surprises and I can remain so!

Bob
March 16, 2015

Amen to that, Jono.

A flat tax is indeed the fairest tax. You make 10 times more, then you pay 10 times more - but not, say, 50 times more.

But try explain this basic arithmetic to the average Australian tall poppy hater - they simply couldn't grasp the maths, that is the basic truth of it.

More than 50% of people can't explain compound interest, let alone a progressive tax system.

All they know is that some people have more money, they don't and it's unfair.

This is Australia.

Jono
January 30, 2015

Bob makes very good points. Same with negative gearing: this is making a loss by definition, but allows some tax deduction, and more punitive the marginal rate, the more tax relief of course.

We hear a lot of demagoguery about the rich "not paying their fair share". But what does that mean? In the USA, the top 1% earn 29.1% of all income, but pay 38.1% of all taxes. The top 10% earn 36.8% but pay 59.0%. The bottom 50% earn 11.% but pay 2.8%. A flat tax is the fairest tax: you make 10 times more, then you pay 10 times more, not, say, 50 times more.

Ramani
December 03, 2014

Like a house constructed long before but occupied by people with different, and often opposing, tastes, our super and tax structures exemplify the implications of incremental adjustments tailored to current priorities and mood swings. The wonder is not it is complicated, but it survives.

That there is no equity in tax is axiomatic: neither the tax collector, or for that matter the payer, bothers much for it. The discussions above show this bias. Those who earn more than $ 300k are by no means in need of a handout from the taxpayer with an average income one seventh of that figure. When, in balancing the books, the treasury mandarins seek to introduce 'equity', we take what exists as gospel truth and cry communist wolf.

Symmetry is another casualty. As pointed out, introducing this tax should have - logically - entailed corresponding changes, but they did not get legislated. I suspect those in a hurry did not get around to it, perhaps. In addition to the pension rebate mentioned, the issue of anti-detriment clawback remains. I suppose an accountant or actuary can take the reasonable view that this is akin to contributions tax, in which case, not only the tax but also its consequential earnings could be repayable. What a tangled web we weave...!

Can someone sue the Government and ATO on behalf of the taxpayer for facilitating the tax-avoidance mindset? That would be the ultimate Part IVA to end all part IVAs...

Bob
January 14, 2015

let's be clear - progressive tax systems are inherently unfair to higher earners; diminishing marginal utility or 'they'll feel the loss, less" is a convenient but not inherently moral justification for taking more of one person's marginal dollar of income, than another. A high income earner is already paying a great deal more tax in $ terms than a low income earner, and will likely use far less of the social infrastructure and services funded by his tax contribution. Further, this talk of "handouts" is offensive and inaccurate. In our socialist nation, the only handouts (transfer payments) flow from the taxes of the wealthy, to the poor. A person on $300k who deigned to maximise their concessional contribution prior to the advent of s293 tax was not accepting a 'handout' from 'the taxpayer' - they were legitimately striving to rebalance a punitive income tax regime that punishes the successful, encourages the mediocre and promotes profilgate welfare spending.

Ken
December 02, 2014

Communist-type tax complete with bureaucratic paperwork headache.

Helen
September 24, 2014

If there have been salary sacrifice amounts that have contributed to a taxpayer being assessed as over $300k, can a taxpayer obtain a refund of salary sacrifice amounts?

Geoff Walker
May 02, 2014

Thankyou, Monica. Does this mean that, in order to avoid double taxation, the 15% rebate for individuals under 60 receiving pension payments will now be increased if they have paid Div 293 tax?

Monica Rule
May 03, 2014

Hi Geoff,

No there is no change to the tax treatment of pension payments as a result of the Division 293 tax paid on concessional contributions by high income earners.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Is a Division 293 tax notice coming your way?

Tips and traps: a final check for your tax return this year

Why extra super contributions tax may catch you too

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?

Interviews

Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.

Superannuation

Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.