Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 60

Beware Division 293 tax on superannuation contributions

Normally when I write articles, I try to minimise the technical jargon. However, this article is about the new tax on superannuation contributions, commonly referred to as the ‘Division 293 tax’, and I encourage you to use the same terminology.

At a recent meeting of SMSF professionals, there were many reports that clients were complaining about this law after receiving a ‘surprise’ tax assessment from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) requesting payment due in 21 days. Before I explain all the nuts and bolts of this law, let me explain its purpose.

What is a Division 293 tax?

Division 293 tax is an additional 15% tax imposed on relevant concessionally taxed superannuation contributions (referred to as low tax contributions) made to superannuation funds (including SMSFs) by individuals whose income exceeds $300,000.

It has been easy to forget this law. It was originally announced in the 2012 Federal Budget as a “Reduction of the higher tax concession for contributions of very high income earners” and at the time wasn’t actually referred to as the ‘Division 293 tax’. The law did not pass until 28 June 2013 and while the commencement date was backdated to 1 July 2012, assessments only started being issued from January 2014.

The purpose of the law

The average income earner’s marginal income tax rate is 32.5% (excluding the Medicare Levy). Superannuation contributions made for the benefit of the individual are taxed at 15%, effectively giving them a 17.5% tax concession. By contrast, very high income earners pay 45% tax on income over $180,000, effectively giving them a 30% tax concession. Division 293 tax applies an additional 15% tax to certain concessional contributions effectively diluting the 30% concession to 15%, in line with the concessions received by average income earners.

Income and contributions included in the $300,000 threshold

An individual will be liable to pay Division 293 tax if the sum of their income plus their low tax contributions exceeds $300,000. The ATO will use the following information from income tax returns:

  • taxable income (assessable income less deductions)
  • total reportable fringe benefits amounts
  • net financial investment loss
  • net rental property loss
  • amounts on which family trust distribution tax has been paid
  • superannuation lump sum taxed elements with a zero tax rate (because it falls within the low rate cap amount).

These elements are added together (except the superannuation lump sum amount, which is subtracted) to give the income amount.

To calculate an individual’s low taxcontributions, the ATO will use the following information:

  • employer contributed amounts
  • other family and friend contributions
  • assessable foreign fund amounts
  • assessable amounts transferred from reserves
  • notional employer contributions, known as defined benefit contributions, when the fund is a defined benefit superannuation fund.

The above contributions are concessionally taxed within a superannuation fund. For Division 293 tax purposes they are known as low tax contributed amounts, and are equal to the low tax contributed amount minus excess concessional contributions. Therefore, low tax contributions do not include non-concessional contributions and concessional contributions that are subject to excess concessional contributions tax.

Division 293 tax of 15% will be charged on an individual’s concessional contributions above the $300,000 threshold (up to the concessional contribution caps). There are special rules for members of defined benefit superannuation funds, constitutionally protected state higher level office holders, certain Commonwealth justices and temporary residents who departed Australia.

Division 293 tax calculation and assessment

To calculate the Division 293 tax liability, the ATO will:

  1. Add the individual’s income and low tax contributions.
  2. Compare the amount from step 1 to the $300,000 threshold to identify any excess above the threshold.
  3. Compare the low tax contribution amount and the amount from step 2. Take the lesser of the two amounts, which then become the taxable contributions.
  4. Apply a 15% tax rate to the taxable contributions.

The following graphic, taken from the ATO’s website, illustrates how the calculation works. In example 2, the amount of Division 293 tax payable would be $1,500 ($10,000 x 15%).

MR Snip1 020514

MR Snip1 020514

The Division 293 tax notice of assessment will state the total earnings for tax purposes, the taxable contributions and the amount of Division 293 tax that is due and payable by a set date which is generally 21 days after the ATO’s notice of assessment was issued.

Individuals are responsible for paying their Division 293 tax. The following payment options are available:

  • pay the assessed tax out of their own monies
  • pay the assessed tax and then seek reimbursement from their fund, or
  • pass on the notice of assessment to their fund using a release authority to have their fund pay the tax on their behalf.

Using a release authority

Individuals can send a release authority to their superannuation fund or SMSF to have the money released. They can choose to have the entire amount or a partial amount released from one fund, or partial amounts released from a number of funds. To do the latter, photocopies can be made and presented to each superannuation fund, as long as there is an original signature on each photocopy and the total amount noted for release does not exceed the amount of the Division 293 tax. Released amounts can be paid to either the individual or directly to the ATO.

General Interest Charge (GIC)

Regardless of how one chooses to pay the tax, if the whole amount is not paid by the due date (21 days after the notice is issued), a general interest charge will start to accrue.

The ATO acknowledges that where a release authority is used, there may be timing issues as superannuation funds are allowed 30 days to process authorities. In these circumstances, the ATO will take this into account when considering applications for remission of GIC accrued during the superannuation fund’s processing period.

 

Monica Rule worked for the ATO for 28 years and is a specialist SMSF adviser. Monica is running SMSF seminars at the Perth Convention and Exhibition Centre on 7 May 2014.

10 Comments
Rajat
June 20, 2018

Hi Monica, if the amount above the threshold is less than the amount of low-tax contributions, does that imply any additional tax deductions (eg last-minute charitable donations) effectively receive a 62% deduction? (ie the donation avoids 45% income tax rate + 2% Medicare levy + 15% Div 293)

Rob
October 20, 2017

Early in 2017 I was made redundant from a company with over 30 years service.
This payment put my taxable income at over $300,000.
My return was completed and assessed, I thought finalised, until 3 months later I received a further assessment under section 293.
Apparently redundancy payments attract no concession from this section.
It would seem this is an area not considered when legislated.
I am now retired, attempting to be self funded with no government support mainly due to my termination payment, hopefully no more surprises and I can remain so!

Bob
March 16, 2015

Amen to that, Jono.

A flat tax is indeed the fairest tax. You make 10 times more, then you pay 10 times more - but not, say, 50 times more.

But try explain this basic arithmetic to the average Australian tall poppy hater - they simply couldn't grasp the maths, that is the basic truth of it.

More than 50% of people can't explain compound interest, let alone a progressive tax system.

All they know is that some people have more money, they don't and it's unfair.

This is Australia.

Jono
January 30, 2015

Bob makes very good points. Same with negative gearing: this is making a loss by definition, but allows some tax deduction, and more punitive the marginal rate, the more tax relief of course.

We hear a lot of demagoguery about the rich "not paying their fair share". But what does that mean? In the USA, the top 1% earn 29.1% of all income, but pay 38.1% of all taxes. The top 10% earn 36.8% but pay 59.0%. The bottom 50% earn 11.% but pay 2.8%. A flat tax is the fairest tax: you make 10 times more, then you pay 10 times more, not, say, 50 times more.

Ramani
December 03, 2014

Like a house constructed long before but occupied by people with different, and often opposing, tastes, our super and tax structures exemplify the implications of incremental adjustments tailored to current priorities and mood swings. The wonder is not it is complicated, but it survives.

That there is no equity in tax is axiomatic: neither the tax collector, or for that matter the payer, bothers much for it. The discussions above show this bias. Those who earn more than $ 300k are by no means in need of a handout from the taxpayer with an average income one seventh of that figure. When, in balancing the books, the treasury mandarins seek to introduce 'equity', we take what exists as gospel truth and cry communist wolf.

Symmetry is another casualty. As pointed out, introducing this tax should have - logically - entailed corresponding changes, but they did not get legislated. I suspect those in a hurry did not get around to it, perhaps. In addition to the pension rebate mentioned, the issue of anti-detriment clawback remains. I suppose an accountant or actuary can take the reasonable view that this is akin to contributions tax, in which case, not only the tax but also its consequential earnings could be repayable. What a tangled web we weave...!

Can someone sue the Government and ATO on behalf of the taxpayer for facilitating the tax-avoidance mindset? That would be the ultimate Part IVA to end all part IVAs...

Bob
January 14, 2015

let's be clear - progressive tax systems are inherently unfair to higher earners; diminishing marginal utility or 'they'll feel the loss, less" is a convenient but not inherently moral justification for taking more of one person's marginal dollar of income, than another. A high income earner is already paying a great deal more tax in $ terms than a low income earner, and will likely use far less of the social infrastructure and services funded by his tax contribution. Further, this talk of "handouts" is offensive and inaccurate. In our socialist nation, the only handouts (transfer payments) flow from the taxes of the wealthy, to the poor. A person on $300k who deigned to maximise their concessional contribution prior to the advent of s293 tax was not accepting a 'handout' from 'the taxpayer' - they were legitimately striving to rebalance a punitive income tax regime that punishes the successful, encourages the mediocre and promotes profilgate welfare spending.

Ken
December 02, 2014

Communist-type tax complete with bureaucratic paperwork headache.

Helen
September 24, 2014

If there have been salary sacrifice amounts that have contributed to a taxpayer being assessed as over $300k, can a taxpayer obtain a refund of salary sacrifice amounts?

Geoff Walker
May 02, 2014

Thankyou, Monica. Does this mean that, in order to avoid double taxation, the 15% rebate for individuals under 60 receiving pension payments will now be increased if they have paid Div 293 tax?

Monica Rule
May 03, 2014

Hi Geoff,

No there is no change to the tax treatment of pension payments as a result of the Division 293 tax paid on concessional contributions by high income earners.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Is a Division 293 tax notice coming your way?

Why extra super contributions tax may catch you too

Zero tax rate on pensions is right and fair

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.