Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 335

Beware: the share valuations failing the commonsense test

Why are interest rates so low? Ask this question to the man-on-the-street and they will likely tell you that the economy is struggling, and the world is facing great uncertainty.

Yet ask an equity analyst about low rates and many will tell you that they are great for asset prices and can propel equity markets even higher in 2020.

Unsurprisingly, there seems to be a disconnect here. Companies rely on the economies in which they operate to drive growth, and if global growth is low, the earnings outlook will be challenged.

So who is right about the outlook for 2020 and beyond? In my opinion, the common sense of the man-on-the-street may be closer to the mark than many professional investors. Growth prospects are low and uncertainty is high, which is not a great combination for many companies.

Some equity market investors are falling into the trap of thinking that interest rates are low purely for their benefit. We believe this is at the heart of why investors get their company valuations wrong.

Why is this wrong?

An investor's job can be simplified to two primary tasks.

First, to predict what a company's cash flows or earnings will be in the future.

Second, to work out how much to pay for those earnings.

In our valuations, we link nominal GDP growth, which is the key driver of earnings, with nominal risk-free rates, which is the key driver of multiples or discount rates. If you lower the discount rate (because bond yields and rates are so low) but maintain trend earnings, it is mathematically possible to justify some of the multiples we are seeing in global equities.

However, at some point, we believe there will be a reckoning. Either earnings are going to disappoint (because growth is lower) or over time, rates must rise. Either way, this will be painful process for the share price of many companies, particularly overvalued companies.

Exhibit 1 is a universe of 250 of the world’s highest quality global companies (based on criteria we use to identify businesses with strong economic moats and predictable earnings), as at 30 September 2019. We have ranked them according to their potential upside, with reference to the differential between their ascribed ‘intrinsic value’ as determined by our fundamental analysis, and the current prevailing market price.

Exhibit 1 shows there is a relatively small number of stocks that will produce strong expected returns over three years, assuming shares trade at our valuation in three years’ time (above zero are companies with positive expected returns, below the line are negative expected returns). Worryingly, for less valuation-sensitive investors, we are ascribing large negative expected returns for many companies (the right-hand side of chart). The lesson here is that buying generally highly regarded companies can lose you money if brought on the wrong valuation.

Exhibit 1: A high quality universe of global shares, value ranked by sector

The opinions and estimates contained in this graph are based on current information and are subject to change. It should not be assumed that any investment was, or will be, profitable. Expected returns do not represent a promise or guarantee of future results and are subject to change. Shown for illustrative purposes only. Currency: AUD.

Each bar represents an individual stock’s expected return per annum for the next three years. This is based on a comparison of Lazard's Global Equity Franchise team’s intrinsic valuation of the stock three years out, the market price of the stock today and the interim forecast dividends.

The largest and most expensive stocks have fared the best

Many of the world-leading companies in the above chart have driven the bull market in 2019. While we acknowledge that some of these technology stocks, in particular, are high-quality businesses with powerful competitive positions, many of them are now trading on multiples that we cannot justify.

The outperformance by the largest stocks in the market is unusual in an historical context. The largest 40 stocks by market cap globally have outperformed recently. This is a reversal of the historical trend where these mega caps normally underperform the broader market.

Related to this has been that the most expensive stocks have also outperformed less expensive stocks, consistent with a momentum driven market.

This has meant that the value drawdown versus growth has now exceeded the 1999 low, making it the biggest drawdown (relative loss) for value stocks in over 30 years, as shown in Exhibit 2. Our view is that this will likely return to an equilibrium level that is more consistent with what we have seen through history. This reversion has historically proven a powerful tailwind for valuation focused investors.

Exhibit 2: Ratio of total returns on value versus growth breaches low point

Shows the ratio between the total returns of the MSCI World Value Index and the MSCI World Growth Index. Source: MSCI

Pockets of opportunity

We are confident that value investors will receive some reward for their discipline as we enter a late cycle period. History shows that when these cycles reverse, they can do so aggressively.

Even in this expensive market, we are seeing some value opportunities. From a global point of view, we are seeking high-quality business that are facing some short-term issues, which for us is creating the value opportunity.

In this category, we would include leading marketing data collection and analytics firm Nielsen, lottery concession holder IGT and tax firm H&R Block. These companies may not be household names, but what they do share is a dominance within their given market and a strong economic moat.

In Australia, we see some value in quality resources companies with growth potential, including Rio Tinto and Woodside. The Lazard Australian Equity team also favours some domestic infrastructure securities for their defensive earnings including Transurban and some growth stocks that have fallen out of favour, such as Domino’s Pizza.

In our view, passive indices and some active portfolios with a mega cap or growth bias will be challenged by a market that is focused more on fundamental valuation and less on momentum drivers. We also believe it is a mistake to use low rates to boost earnings multiples if you do not reduce growth expectations. These two numbers (interest rates and growth) must remain connected for a robust valuation framework.

Relative to fixed income and cash, equities can still make sense in 2020, but investors must be disciplined in their valuation frameworks and not overpay, particularly this late in the cycle.


Warryn Robertson is a Portfolio Manager/Analyst on the Lazard Global Equity Franchise, Global Listed Infrastructure and Australian Equity teams. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.



It’s the large stocks driving fund misery

Headwinds and tailwinds, a decade in review

Why August company reporting season was poor


Most viewed in recent weeks

Who's next? Discounts on LICs force managers to pivot

The boards and managers of six high-profile LICs, frustrated by their shares trading at large discounts to asset value, have embarked on radical strategies to fix the problems. Will they work?

Four simple things to do right now

Markets have recovered in the last six months but most investors remain nervous about the economic outlook. Morningstar analysts provide four quick tips on how to navigate this uncertainty.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 373

It was a milestone for strange times last week when the company with the longest record in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) index, ExxonMobil, once the largest company in the world, was replaced by a software company, Salesforce. Only one company in the original DJIA exists today. As businesses are disrupted, how many of the current DJIA companies will disappear in the next decade or two?

  • 2 September 2020

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 374

Suddenly, it's the middle of September and we don't hear much about 'snap back' anymore. Now we have 'wind backs' and 'road maps'. Six months ago, I was flying back from Antarctica after two weeks aboard the ill-fated Greg Mortimer cruise ship, and then the world changed. So it's time to take your temperature again. Our survey checks your reaction to recent policies and your COVID-19 responses.

  • 9 September 2020

Reporting season winners and losers in listed property trusts

Many property trust results are better than expected, with the A-REIT sector on a dividend yield of 4.8%. But there's a wide variation by sector and the ability of tenants to pay the rent.

Every SMSF trustee should have an Enduring Power of Attorney

COVID-19 and the events of 2020 show why, more than ever, SMSF trustees need to prepare for the ‘unexpected’ by having an Enduring Power of Attorney in place. A Power of Attorney is not enough.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

Who's next? Discounts on LICs force managers to pivot

The boards and managers of six high-profile LICs, frustrated by their shares trading at large discounts to asset value, have embarked on radical strategies to fix the problems. Will they work?


Have stock markets become a giant Ponzi scheme?

A global financial casino has been created where investors ignore realistic valuations in the low growth, high-risk environment. At some point, analysis of fundamental value will be rewarded.


Interview Series: Why it’s gold’s time to shine

With gold now on the radar of individual investors, SMSFs and institutions, here's what you need to know about the choices between gold bars, gold ETFs and even gold miners, with Jordan Eliseo. 

SMSF strategies

SMSFs during COVID-19 and your 14-point checklist

SMSFs come with an administration burden underestimated by many. For example, did you know trustees need to document a member’s decision to take the reduced pension minimum under the new COVID rules?


Funding retirement through a stock market crash

On the surface, a diversified fund looks the same as an SMSF with the same asset allocations. But to fund retirement, a member must sell units in the fund, whereas the cash balance is used in an SMSF.

Australia’s debt and interest burden: can we afford it?

Australia has an ageing population and rising welfare and health costs, but it is still the best placed among its ‘developed’ country peers. Here's why the expected levels of debt are manageable.

Weekly Editorial

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 375

There are many ways to value a company, but the most popular is to estimate the future cash flows and discount them to a present value using a chosen interest rate. Does it follow that when interest rates fall, companies become more valuable? Perhaps, but only if the cash flows remain unchanged, and in a recession, future earnings are more difficult to sustain. What do Buffett and Douglass and 150 years of data say?

  • 16 September 2020
  • 5



© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.