Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 228

Building better portfolios by forecasting markets

In the age of the 24-hour news cycle, many are devoting considerable effort into predicting the next market move. However, history has shown that trying to ‘time the market’ is extremely challenging even for the most astute of investors. Given this, how should we think about investing and constructing portfolios?

A report by Research Affiliates titled 'Pricing Stocks and Bonds' introduces a simple framework which sheds light on how we can forecast expected returns and construct an optimal portfolio. Instead of focussing on the short term, Research Affiliates argues there is greater value in forecasting long-run returns which can be predicted with greater reliability. Admittedly, even forecasts of long-term returns are unlikely to turn out accurately. But precision in forecasting is not necessary for constructing optimal portfolios.

They illustrate this via a simple framework which has outperformed a standard 60/40 portfolio (60% equity, 40% bonds).

Simplest return expectations

In our quest to estimate future returns, a crystal ball is not needed to foretell the future. Instead, they attempt to quantify the returns if everything unfolds as they expect (which admittedly rarely happens). Hence, they account for returns from unexpected events through the idea of an ‘unexpected shock’. In short:

Future Return = Expected Return + Unexpected Shock

To establish the framework, they examine a scenario where everything plays out as they expect. Imagine investing in a security with zero chance of default, does not pay dividends and is held until maturity. An example of this is a three-month certificate of deposit. In this case, the future return of the investment and the expected return today is known with certainty as the purchase yield of the investment. They look up its yield and know exactly what the future return will be. They can consider the same problem in a different way by asking the four questions below:

If the answer to all of the questions above is ‘yes’, then they know with absolute certainty that the future return of the investment is equal to its yield today. Of course, most of the time, there is no certainty about future cash flows, either due to default (fixed income) or due to cash flows that are not contractual (e.g. equity dividends). As they attempt to price a wider variety of investments, they begin to answer more negatives to these four questions. Consequently, the expected return moves away from the purchase yield and returns becomes more difficult to estimate. To overcome this, they adopt a framework based on long-term expectations.

Begin with a focus on the long term

To minimise the impact of idiosyncratic shocks in asset returns, they focus on long-term returns as they tend to be more predictable. One study found the volatility of 1-year returns to be 19.2%, while the volatility of 10-year returns was only 4.7%. However, unless the historical average of returns is accepted as the future expected returns, a tighter distribution of returns is of no great use. Instead, Research Affiliates documents below how to forecast expected returns.

1. Forecasting bond returns

Calculating an asset’s expected return is dependent on assumptions of certainty, size of cash flows, reinvestment rate, and holding horizon. Relaxing the hold-to-maturity and constant reinvestment rate assumption, they find that a strong relationship exists between the yield of a bond today and the yield of a similar bond issued a year ago. As a result, they use knowledge of bond yields today to predict future bond returns even if they do not hold the bond until maturity.

2. Forecasting stock returns

Forecasting stock returns is similar to forecasting bond returns, but they need to relax all four initial assumptions. This is because dividend payments are not fixed, equity holders can be wiped out by default, reinvestment rates change, and stocks do not have a maturity date. By relaxing these assumptions, dividend yield alone does not do a good job of predicting future returns. Instead, returns can be explained by three additional factors: inflation, growth in dividends and changes in valuation levels. The impact of these factors on returns can be seen below:

Research Affiliates finds the model does a fairly good job of predicting stock returns, however they concede they have often missed the mark. Forecasting returns is not an exact science.

Building a portfolio using expected returns

Using the expected returns generated, they proceed to construct a portfolio.

They allocate between stocks and bonds by comparing current expected return for each asset against its historical expectations. By doing this, they can form a ‘confidence score’ for stocks and bonds and allocate across these assets accordingly. For instance, if stocks have a high expected return versus its historical expected return, the model shows more confidence in the ‘cheapness’ of stocks and assigns a greater weight to stocks.

Using the strategy proposed, they find that it consistently outperforms a 60/40 portfolio across different rebalancing intervals, delivering superior returns with less volatility.


What this means

First, the framework does not imply they can predict short-term market moves. Instead, it focusses on long-term relationships that are more reliable.

Second, the proposed multi-question framework provides a useful approach for forecasting the future returns of any asset class. It is not limited to just stocks and bonds.

Finally, even if the long-term return expectations are not accurate, Research Affiliates argues they can construct portfolios which add value over a ‘set and forget’ portfolio.


Wilbur Li recently completed his Bachelor of Commerce (Honours in Finance) at the University of Melbourne and he will soon commence at a Melbourne-based fund manager. He has worked at Unisuper (global equities) and PwC (debt and fixed income). This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.


Understanding the benefits of rebalancing

Is your portfolio playing 20/20 or test cricket?

How family offices differ from institutions


Most viewed in recent weeks

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 433 with weekend update

There’s this story about a group of US Air Force generals in World War II who try to figure out ways to protect fighter bombers (and their crew) by examining the location of bullet holes on returning planes. Mapping the location of these holes, the generals quickly come to the conclusion that the areas with the most holes should be prioritised for additional armour.

  • 11 November 2021

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 431 with weekend update

House prices have risen at the fastest pace for 33 years, but what actually happened in 1988, and why is 2021 different? Here's a clue: the stockmarket crashed 50% between September and November 1987. Looking ahead, where did house prices head in the following years, 1989 to 1991?

  • 28 October 2021

Why has Australia slipped down the global super ranks?

Australia appears to be slipping from the pantheon of global superstar pension systems, with a recent report placing us sixth. A review of an earlier report, which had Australia in bronze position, points to some reasons why, and what might need to happen to regain our former glory.

How to help people with retirement spending decisions

Super funds will soon be required to offer retirement income strategies for members in decumulation. With uncertain returns, uncertain timelines, and different goals, it's possibly “the hardest, nastiest problem in finance".

Tips when taking large withdrawals from super

You want to take a lump sum from your super, but what's the best way? Should it come from you or your spouse, or the pension or accumulation account. There is a welcome flexibility to select the best outcome.

Latest Updates


John Woods on diversification using asset allocation

All fund managers now claim to take ESG factors into account, but a multi-asset ethical fund will look quite different from a mainstream fund. Faced with low fixed income returns, alternatives have a bigger role.

SMSF strategies

Don't believe the SMSF statistics on investment allocation

The ATO's data on SMSF asset allocation is as much as 27 months out-of-date and categories such as cash and global investments are reported incorrectly. We should question the motives of some who quote the numbers.

Investment strategies

Highlights of reader tips for young investors

In this second part on the reader responses with advice to younger people, we have selected a dozen highlights, but there are so many quality contributions that a full list of comments is also attached.

Investment strategies

Four climate themes offer investors the next big thing

Climate-related companies will experience exponential growth driven by consumer demand and government action. Investors who identify the right companies will benefit from four themes which will last decades.

Investment strategies

Inflation remains transitory due to strong long-term trends

There is momentum to stop calling inflation 'transitory' but this overlooks deep-seated trends. A longer-term view will see companies like ARB, Reece, Macquarie Telecom and CSL more valuable in a decade.


Infrastructure and the road to recovery

Infrastructure assets experienced varying fortunes during the pandemic, from less travel at airports to strong activity in communications. On the road to recovery, what role does infrastructure play in a portfolio?


The three prices that everyone should worry about

Among the myriad of numbers that bombard us every day, three prices matter greatly to the world economy. Recent changes in these prices help to understand the potential for a global recovery and interest rates.


Why green hydrogen is central to achieving net zero

Hundreds of green hydrogen projects show this energy opportunity is finally being taken seriously. While a cost disadvantage and technical challenges need to be overcome, it promises to deliver a path to net zero.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.