Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 292

Cuffelinks Edition 292

  •   8 February 2019
  •      
  •   

Why not litigate?

Even the harshest critics of Kenneth Hayne's Final Report must acknowledge a major success: the evidence presented was so egregious that the regulators must have the resources and fearlessness to do their job properly. As recently as the last Budget, the Government cut ASIC's funding by $41 million a year over four years, and Labor made similar moves in the past. Now they're falling over themselves to show who is toughest on crime. Hayne's enduring legacy will be measured by the future tenacity and success of regulators. He says on page 424:

"In the end, the critical question whenever ASIC is considering any contravention of the law must be the question ASIC now accepts must be asked: ‘Why not litigate?’".

Some readers have criticised me for my restrained support of the Commission's work, one calling me 'an apologist for the banks'. It's ironic. I lost a major bank consulting assignment for writing a whistleblower book in 2001. I'll never forget the Group Treasurer calling me into his office and saying, "I agree with what you've written, but you can't stay here."

So let's hear the response to the Final Report from a few leading voices. The journalist most influential in establishing the Royal Commission, Adele Ferguson, wrote in the SMH:

"For those Australians hoping for structural separation of the banks, an overhaul of the regulators or heads on sticks, Royal Commissioner Kenneth Hayne's verdict would have been disappointing. There was little blood and gore. It was more like a soft landing ... Customers were ripped off but the regulators had little or no appetite to use the tools at their disposal, preferring instead to do cosy deals with those they were meant to police. Despite this, Hayne is giving them more powers and more work and has faith they will now actually do their job."

Alan Kohler wrote of Commissioner Hayne in The Australian:

“His decision to not call for the separation of product and advice is both inexplicable and egregious. Another significant failure is that he has nothing to say about percentage fees and the high cost of financial advice. In fact, he seems to applaud it.”

And Jonathan Mott of UBS said:

"The much anticipated release of the Royal Commission Final Report was disappointing, in our view. There was much discussion around misconduct within the banks and the need to change culture; however, the final recommendations fell well short of market expectations … most of the cultural change will be self-enforced. Without powerful recommendations, we are concerned that ensuring lasting cultural change over the years may be difficult."

On another positive, Hayne should be applauded for avoiding more complicated legislation. He wants to "reduce exceptions and carve outs" to "simplify(ing) the law so that its intent is met". His six principles should guide everyone in any industry:

  • Obey the law
  • Do not mislead or deceive
  • Act fairly
  • Provide services that are fit for purpose
  • Deliver services with reasonable care and skill
  • When acting for another, act in the best interests of that other.

Noel Whittaker highlights a section of the Royal Commission he believes is flawed. My prediction is Recommendation 1.3 will not be adopted in full by either the Government or Labor. It says:

"The borrower, not the lender, should pay the mortgage broker a fee for acting in connection with home lending."

Let's move on. This is an amazing chart of US price changes in the last 20 years. It shows that individual companies and people are affected differently by inflation, as we all have unique expenses and costs. Overall inflation in this period was 56%, but hospital services were up over 200%, with education close behind, while electronic goods, clothing and cars were vastly more affordable, rising less than wages. Little wonder a high cost country like Australia has moved more into services and less into manufacturing, facing this competition.

 


Also in this week's edition, Will Gormly shows that Listed Investment Companies (LICs) trading at a discount should not be considered a bargain as they may never return to par, while Chris Meyer explains Active ETFs and their unique identity in our listed product range.

Graeme Colley reminds SMSF trustees of five common mistakes that could be costly to make, and Lawrence Lam suggests investors should develop the mindset of a founder when looking for the best companies. He offers a few examples of his favourites.

Further comments on the Royal Commission are welcome, or anything else in Have Your Say.

This week's White Paper from Fidante Partners is called 'Hype cycle: is it too soon to buy', including evidence retail investors have stepped back from equities but institutions are buying. 

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

 

For a PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles, click here.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.