Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 293

Cuffelinks Newsletter Edition 293

  •   15 February 2019
  •      
  •   

The implications of the Royal Commission are spreading well beyond the initial focus on prosecutions, mortgage broking and the two big NAB resignations. In financial advice, planners with large books of trail commissions have also been hit. How many clients realised if they generated a trail commission of $1,000 a year, it was also worth $3,000 on the value of the adviser's business?

A broker of grandfathered trail commissions, Radar Results, this week advised clients that books of clients that had sold for 3X trail in 2013 to 2017 will probably fall in value to about 1X after Kenneth Hayne's recommendation (likely trail end date 1 January 2021). This is akin to the decline in the value of taxi plates as Uber moved in. Radar said trails were previously attractive because Fee Disclosure Statements were not required and opt-in rules did not apply. Some advisers borrowed to buy these books expecting income for life. Many advice businesses do not have trails, and it was ill-informed of any adviser to expect they would last forever. There is a disincentive for an adviser to move a grandfathered client to a better product. Hayne said:

"The interests of client, intermediary and provider of a product or service are not only different, they are opposed. An intermediary who seeks to ‘stand in more than one canoe’ cannot. Duty (to client) and (self) interest pull in opposite directions." 

The Royal Commission suggests disruptive changes in the way some products are distributed. Roy Morgan research on channel usage shows managed investments are heavily dependent on intermediaries (funds are sold not bought) and how much superannuation relies on employers.  


    
This week, we have a survey to gauge your reaction to the Royal Commission. It's seven short questions which will take a few minutes of your time, with results published next week.

I went to university with Ken Henry, and while Kenneth Hayne was critical of many people and companies during the hearings, I examine why Henry became the Commission's biggest scalp. I recorded a podcast with Damien Klassen and Tim Fuller on consequences of the Commission.

Labor's franking policy has become a massive political issue, yet the imputation system is poorly understood. In our simple explanation, we distill it to this: to avoid taxing company profits twice, tax must be paid at either the company or individual level, but not both. If it were paid only at a company level, high income earners would benefit from the 30% tax rate. So our system taxes company profits at an individual level. Any tax already paid by the company is refunded. 

More on investing and markets ...

Rachel Folder draws on insights from Howard Marks for guidance on handling market volatility, while James Bloom says the recent rise in US bond rates makes the case for owning equities for yield much less compelling. Jacob Mitchell warns about populism trends around the world. 

Kristen Le Mesurier identifies 10 trends in ESG investing that go beyond the 'feel good' to direct implications for investments, and Patrick Potts shows which companies are likely to benefit from the opportunities presented by 5G

This week's White Paper from UBS Asset Management is a comprehensive review of China following a recent visit. We also feature the latest Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) updates from BetaShares and Vanguard in this increasingly important part of the listed market.

With so much going on, we're experiencing record numbers of visits to our website, and feel free to discuss anything relevant to our audience in Have Your Say

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

 

For a PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles, click here.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.