Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 537

Diversification is not a free lunch

Harry Markowitz is reported to have said that “diversification is the only free lunch in investing”. This is the notion that holding a broader range of assets can result in better returns without assuming more risk. Over the decades this has become accepted wisdom – but it is not true. Diversification isn’t free; it is painful and difficult to achieve.

Why diversification is difficult

Diversification is a vital concept for investors. It is an acceptance that the future is inherently unknowable and can take many different directions. If done well it provides protection against both uncertainty and hubris. The best indicator of an investor’s overconfidence is how concentrated their portfolio is. If we could accurately predict the future, then we would only own one security.

Given this, why is diversification a problem?

Because it is behaviourally difficult. To be appropriately diversified not only means holding assets that will be a disappointment, but where we actively want them to disappoint in advance.

If everything is performing well and in concert, our portfolios are probably not diversified.

If we are appropriately diversified, we will look at our portfolio and see a collection of strong performers and laggards. Rather than be comfortable with this as an inevitable feature of diversification however, we will have the urge to make changes. Removing the struggling positions and adding more to those that have produced stellar results.

It is far more comfortable for our portfolios to be focused on the top performing assets rather than be genuinely diversified. It will feel like there is nothing to worry about – everything is working well. Although we are drawn towards this type of situation, it is merely a short-term complacency that will foster almost certain long-term pain.

Diversification is constantly put in jeopardy by our behavioural failings. For the assets that are outperforming in our portfolios, the prevailing market narratives will persuade us that this environment will persist forever. Conversely, the stories around the stragglers will make us believe that they will never deliver again.

When we are reviewing the performance of our portfolio, diversification often feels like a bad idea – because we could have always held more of the assets that provided the highest returns.

Hindsight makes diversification look unnecessary.

Things to remember about diversification

Given that maintaining appropriate levels of diversification is likely to prove a constant challenge for investors, there are two crucial concepts to place at the forefront of our thinking:

– Things will be different in the future: Markets are constantly adapting, things will be different in the future in ways that we are unable to predict.

– Things could have been different in the past: When we look at the performance of our portfolios, we assume that it was inescapable that this particular course had been charted, but, of course, this is never the case. In a chaotic, complex system, entirely different outcomes could have come to pass.

Diversification requires us to own positions that haven’t performed well, and we don’t expect to always perform well. That doesn’t mean we should naively hold any asset irrespective of its fundamental characteristics, but we must accept that to be well-diversified requires us to have relative slackers in our portfolios at all points in time.

Nothing that works in investing provides a free lunch, it always comes with some behavioural pain. For diversification, it is the acute sense of regret about how much better things could have been.

 

Joe Wiggins is Chief Investment Officer at Fundhouse (UK) and publisher of investment insights through a behavioural science lens at www.behaviouralinvestment.com. His book The Intelligent Fund Investor explores the beliefs and behaviours that lead investors astray, and shows how we can make better decisions.

 

6 Comments
Barry
December 05, 2023

The article is based on a total fallacy.
Diversity is across companies and sectors and geography etc, not across winners and lovers. The aim is to diversify across the winners. If a company is not performing it makes no sense to retain it just for the sake of diversity. What a woke idea.

CC
December 03, 2023

But Warren Buffet says most investors are best off putting 90% into the S&P500 index

richard goers
December 03, 2023

Not to labour the point - if ~ 5% of stocks create 100% of the wealth [resourced facts] then these stocks have particular attributes that make them successful - research is to find these attributes, even as they may change through time - their edge or moat - and history of their price action gives us thee winners Diversification, into ETF indexes like ASX200 or SP500 have the majority of stocks that dont make the cash rate as a return, or more to the point, the magnificent 7 stocks in the NASDAQ prove the point I dont see the rationalalisation to buy stocks that dont make a solid return above the riskless rate in their history but to seek out and look for the winners - as the rest are road kill if capital gains are the metric - nonetheless it cant be easy to do this research and take the risk appetite needed for a concentrated portfolio - so put 80% into a diversified portfolio and 20% into 'extreme' punts = aka BTC or biotech or AI or a concentrated AI portfolio - or if an Australian, investment houses

Graham Wright
December 03, 2023

Diversification! The greatest misleader perpetrated on investors managing their own investments. It is almost certainly a must for fund managers who have large FUM to invest and who have to consider the risk profiles of their investors. At the other end of the scale, business owners, especially in their starting years, have a single investment, their business, and a single product or service, all supported by committing the whole of their owned assets plus borrowings, to their investment. They usually have neither resources or time for diversification until the initial business succeeds. They put all their eggs into one basket and fully commit themselves to work for success. Diversifying our investments does not create wealth. Working hard to find the right investments and working to make the investments profitable is what works. The business manager works to make his/her future successful, no sitting waiting for the profits to roll in. They make modifications to their business as the business environment says change is needed, just as we investors need to constantly review our investments and make changes as the environment tells us that change may be needed.

Lyn
December 01, 2023

With thanks to author, your article gave me a perk as only yesterday reviewed a "laggard" with critical eyes on quarterly report I'd avoided, a will it or won't it? and a serve of self-doubt. It is hard to stick at diverse course, as inferred in part of Munger obit article the money is in the waiting so this edition gave a lone investor a lift even though inherently knew should not doubt decision to stick.

Julie T
November 30, 2023

Just because diversification is difficult to deal with psychologically doesn't make the theory wrong. Far from it. There's lots of academic literature supporting Markowitz. Though this article doesn't disapprove the theory, it makes some valid points.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Does gold still deserve a place in a diversified portfolio?

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Maybe it’s time to consider taxing the family home

Australia could unlock smarter investment and greater equity by reforming housing tax concessions. Rethinking exemptions on the family home could benefit most Australians, especially renters and owners of modest homes.

Supercharging the ‘4% rule’ to ensure a richer retirement

The creator of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals, Bill Bengen, has written a new book outlining fresh strategies to outlive your money, including holding fewer stocks in early retirement before increasing allocations.

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Why we should follow Canada and cut migration

An explosion in low-skilled migration to Australia has depressed wages, killed productivity, and cut rental vacancy rates to near decades-lows. It’s time both sides of politics addressed the issue.

Are franking credits worth pursuing?

Are franking credits factored into share prices? The data suggests they're probably not, and there are certain types of stocks that offer higher franking credits as well as the prospect for higher returns.

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Latest Updates

A nation of landlords and fund managers

Super and housing dwarf every other asset class in Australia, and they’ve both become too big to fail. Can they continue to grow at current rates, and if so, what are the implications for the economy, work and markets?

Economy

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Retirement

Retiring debt-free may not be the best strategy

Retiring with debt may have advantages. Maintaining a mortgage on the family home can provide a line of credit in retirement for flexibility, extra income, and a DIY reverse mortgage strategy.

Shares

Why the ASX is losing Its best companies

The ASX is shrinking not by accident, but by design. A governance model that rewards detachment over ownership is driving capital into private hands and weakening public markets.

Investment strategies

3 reasons the party in big tech stocks may be over

The AI boom has sparked investor euphoria, but under the surface, US big tech is showing cracks - slowing growth, surging capex, and fading dominance signal it's time to question conventional tech optimism.

Investment strategies

Resilience is the new alpha

Trade is now a strategic weapon, reshaping the investment landscape. In this environment, resilient companies - those capable of absorbing shocks and defending margins - are best positioned to outperform.

Shares

The DNA of long-term compounding machines

The next generation of wealth creation is likely to emerge from founder influenced firms that combine scalable models with long-term alignment. Four signs can alert investors to these companies before the crowds.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.