Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 564

Do Government bonds still have a role to play for Australian investors?

The past four years have been quite turbulent for fixed income, an asset class that is generally characterised as defensive. An important question to ask is whether Government and other high-quality fixed rate bonds still have a role to play for Australian investors.

To answer that question, we must first ask, what is the purpose of bonds in a portfolio?

The role of bonds in a diversified portfolio

While priorities may differ from one investor to the next, in a diversified investment portfolio bonds play four different roles.

  • Income/Return: As its name suggests, fixed income generates an income stream. Ideally this should be above the return on cash (you earn a premium for taking duration or interest rate risk) and the rate of inflation (you earn a real return).
  • Defensiveness: A concept not easily measured, but relative to riskier assets like shares, we generally expect fixed rate bonds to experience fewer and smaller drawdowns, with falls recovered more quickly. The very nature of a bond means that high quality fixed income should also have a lower probability of a permanent loss of capital.
  • Diversification: Bonds often exhibit low or negative correlation against shares (when shares go up, bond prices fall and vice versa). These diversification benefits can reduce the overall volatility of a portfolio that also contains risk assets.
  • Liquidity: High grade bonds should be easily saleable and at little cost, which can provide a readily available source of funding when market opportunities arise.

On every one of those measures, Australian bonds have failed investors at some point since the onset of the pandemic.

The reality of the past few years

In 2020, when financial markets were concerned about pandemic induced stagnation and possible deflation, the yield on the Ausbond Australian Government Bond benchmark portfolio of Australian government bonds was as low as 0.6%[1] implying its forward-looking ability to provide income or return was negligible.

Between 2020 and its lows in 2023, as concerns transitioned towards excessive inflation amongst supply chain problems and strong labour markets, global central banks including the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) hiked rates aggressively and bond yields surged. The Australian Government Bond benchmark lost nearly 15% of its initial value[2] and more than four years since the onset of the pandemic is still 10% below its peak (chart 1). This marked the largest and longest lasting drawdown in bonds in decades.

Chart 1: Annual Returns of Australian Government Bonds vs Shares

The upshot of this is that bonds and shares have in recent years been positively rather than negatively correlated, which can reduce the diversification benefits of owning bonds as a hedge for shares. During 2022, as share markets faltered, bonds were even weaker and bond holdings compounded the loss for diversified investors (chart 2).

Chart 2: Drawdowns in Australian Government Bonds and Shares

The question remains then - looking forward, what benefit can we expect from holding high quality fixed rate bonds?

Well the good news is that the experience of recent years has set up a far better environment, both in respect of the prospective return income bonds can be expected to generate and the defensiveness that investors can expect from them.

Income and return expectations

In terms of income expectations, a good starting point for annual average return expectations for a diversified portfolio of government bonds over a five-to-six-year horizon (which is the average maturity of the bonds), is the current yield of that portfolio.

Realised returns may differ from that initial yield depending on the movement in bond yields over the period.

Recall that bond prices move inversely to the yield so realised returns can be higher than the initial yield if yields have fallen. This is what occurred over the three decades leading up to the pandemic when yields were in long term structural decline.

In contrast realised returns can be lower than the initial yield if yields have risen which is what has occurred since the pandemic (chart 3).

Chart 3: Yield on Government Bond Index vs 5 year forward realised returns

The current yield on the Australian Government Bond benchmark is approximately 4.4%. This can be a good starting estimate for expected returns for a portfolio of Government bonds over coming years, though a large swing in bond yields in either direction would impact realised returns.

It’s important to note that while this yield is below current returns on cash and recent inflation outcomes, it does appear to represent a reasonable premium over the likely forward looking cash return (which we expect to be in a 3-4% range) and the expected rate of inflation (the RBA target is inflation of 2-3%).

How defensive are bonds right now?

In terms of defensiveness, you could argue that at higher starting yields, future drawdowns in bonds could once again be both less frequent and of smaller magnitude. This is because there is a higher income cushion to protect against price falls for a given increase in yields (chart 4).

Chart 4: Increase in yield required to eliminate income cushion on Government bonds

At the peak of the pandemic, when the yield on the Australian Government Bond benchmark was just 0.60%, just a 0.1% point increase in yields was enough to wipe out the income cushion for the year and deliver a negative return on bonds. Now that the starting yields of the benchmark portfolio is higher at 4.4%, it would take around 0.8% of an increase in yields to deplete the higher income cushion.

A higher starting yield can also impact the range of potential return outcomes looking ahead. Though it is plausible that yields could still move higher and deliver further drag on performance, there is less pressure to do so at a higher starting yield. Similarly, starting at a higher level of bond yields can also open up a greater potential for yields to fall in the event of a downturn in the economy, which can create the opportunity for price appreciation in bonds.

Will bonds regain their diversification benefits?

As highlighted earlier, the celebrated diversification benefits of bonds are at their maximum when bond returns exhibit negative correlation with equity returns i.e bond prices rise (or bond yields fall) when share prices fall.

Indeed, this has been the dominant experience of investors for most of the past 30 years and has contributed to the popularity of a diversified portfolio of shares and fixed rate bonds.

While the breakdown of this relationship in recent years might feel like the exception to the modern investor, over a broader sweep of history there are long periods where shares and bonds have been positively correlated.

So, in what circumstances are bond correlations positive and negative?

The experience of negative correlation of recent decades coincided with the introduction of inflation targeting central banks which helped keep inflation low and stable. Policymakers were assisted in keeping inflation low by globalisation, particularly the integration of China into global supply chains, technological advances, more flexible labour and product markets, economies that were more resilient to supply shocks and an unusually benign geopolitical backdrop. In this environment, the main driver of financial markets was economic growth. When growth trends dictate financial market moves, shares and bonds move in different directions. An improvement in growth is good for shares but bad for bonds as interest rates move higher and vice versa.

Positive correlation in contrast occurs when economic developments push shares and bonds in the same direction. Historically there are two situations in which this can arise:

  1. When a sovereign becomes so deeply indebted that the perceived credit worthiness of the government is exacerbated by weak growth. This is the situation that the Italian Government found itself in for about a decade after the Global Financial Crisis.
  2. When inflation is high and there is increased uncertainty as to whether it can be contained. This has been the environment since the onset of the pandemic. In an environment when inflation is the dominant driver of policy making and interest rates rise potentially at the cost of economic growth, this pushes share prices and bond prices in the same direction.

Given that the Australian Government maintains very low debt, the former situation is unlikely. However, it is far from assured that Australia will return to the low and stable inflation environment of the preceding three decades.

There are a few reasons for this: Governments around the world seem more comfortable with fiscal excess, globalisation has given way to deglobalisation and a more fractured supply chain, a falling proportion of working age population and higher dependency will reduce the availability of labour relative to demand. Climate change leading to more extreme weather and supply shortages will make the cost of food and transportation more variable, and the cost of funding the energy transition, may also lead to higher energy prices.

Looking forward, while there will be periods, such as in a growth shock, that bonds and shares will move in opposite directions. Investors need to be aware that there will likely be more frequent periods where bonds and shares move in the same direction, reducing the diversification benefit that bonds provide.

Final comments

In our view high grade fixed rate bonds can offer a reasonable prospect of return in excess of both inflation and cash and are likely do so with fewer and smaller drawdowns that are recovered more quickly. But bonds are unlikely to deliver the outsized returns that we saw over the three decades leading up to the pandemic, and we can expect more frequent periods where bonds move in the same direction as shares.

 

David Colosimo hosts UniSuper’s monthly investment podcast (SuperInformed Radio) talking about what’s happening in the economy and investment markets. Subscribe and find all previous episodes via Apple Podcasts, Spotify, SoundCloud, or wherever you get your podcasts. UniSuper, a sponsor of Firstlinks.

Please note that past performance isn’t an indicator of future performance. The information in this article is of a general nature and may include general advice. It doesn’t take into account your personal financial situation, needs or objectives. Before making any investment decision, you should consider your circumstances, the PDS and TMD relevant to you, and whether to consult a qualified financial adviser.

 

[1] September 2020
[2] November 2020 to June 2022

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Stars align for fixed income

How gold can help diversify your portfolio

Inflation: A rare SMSF consideration

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

9 winning investment strategies

There are many ways to invest in stocks, but some strategies are more effective than others. Here are nine tried and tested investment approaches - choosing one of these can improve your chances of reaching your financial goals.

Latest Updates

Taxation

100 Aussies: seven charts on who earns, pays, and owns

The Labor government is talking up tax reform to lift Australia’s ailing economic growth. Before any changes are made, it’s important to know who pays tax, who owns assets, and how much people have in their super for retirement.

7 key charts on the state of the Australian property market

The Australian property market stirs fierce debate - often bullish optimism versus crash predictions. But beyond the noise, seven charts reveal what's really driving prices and the outlook for residential real estate.

A simple alternative to the $3 million super tax

Division 296 aims to introduce improved fairness into the superannuation system, yet is overly complex. This scours the world for better ideas and suggests a simpler alternative which can achieve the same goals.

CBA and the index conundrum for super funds

After the hyperbolic rise in CBA shares, super funds are floating the idea of carving out the weightings of ASX bank securities and indexing them within their portfolios. This looks at why that might be a big error.

Strategy

10 policies to drive Australian productivity higher

Here's a comprehensive list of proposed reforms to fix Australia's stagnating economy, including introducing a flat income tax rate, reducing migration, and making childcare tax-deductible.

Interviews

Where to find big winners in Asia

As more money looks for a home outside the US, Asia may soon get some love. Fidelity's Anthony Srom outlines the best places in Asia to invest, including in Chinese consumer names, Indian financials, and Thailand.

Investment strategies

We have trouble understanding the time value of money

We overvalue the present and underestimate the future - it’s a cognitive glitch called hyperbolic discounting. It affects savings, spending, and loans, and it's more common - and costly - than we think. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.