Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 238

Does fixed income diversify portfolio risk?

The coordinated global fall in interest rates since the 2008 financial crisis has been one of the greatest tailwinds to asset prices in modern financial history. Interest rates underpin the valuation of most financial assets as their expected future cash flows are discounted relative to government bond yields. The effect of falling discount rates has been to increase their present capital values (i.e. their prices).

This dynamic has become progressively more extreme as the accumulated effect of extraordinary central bank intervention - abnormally low interest rates, combined with asset purchases - has pushed government bond yields to historically low (or even negative) levels and propelled investors to ever greater heights of risk-seeking behavior.

Is the party finally over?

This tailwind is subsiding. While the stronger global economic growth and declining central bank policy stimulus narrative is becoming more widespread, the missing chapter of the story has been inflation, which has been slow to emerge.

Not only is low inflation pervasive today, it has also become stubbornly entrenched into inflation expectations far into the future as markets assume the party continues along with very gradual policy normalisation.

However, given this policy normalisation is occurring after an unprecedented period of market-distorting stimulus, it is far from clear what the unintended consequences will be for financial markets. Even a little unexpected inflation can easily upset this delicate balance.

There are early indications that inflationary pressures are building. Notably, labour markets globally are tightening, manufacturing costs are rising and even in the land of deflation, the Bank of Japan recently noted that inflation expectations have stopped falling.

For years, central banks have prolonged stimulus without any real knowledge whether inflation transmission is working, thereby risking an overshoot. History shows that when inflation expectations shift, they shift quickly, which could force more aggressive policy normalisation than markets are expecting.

In this scenario, the party may be over.

What does this mean for investments?

Assets that shone brightly against the dim light of a low interest rate world would be reassessed under the harsh glare of higher interest rates. Against this backdrop, it’s natural to question whether government bond holdings can still play their traditional role as risk diversifiers.

Let’s begin with the traditional context, where a conventional ‘risk-off’ scenario like a recession occurs. Investors can probably expect their government bond holdings to help offset equity losses as capital flees to safety and bond prices rise as interest rates are cut.

Alternatively, if the current consensus view – improving growth, contained inflation and gradually rising rates – does play out, bonds provide stable income but still expose investors to risk of modest capital losses from rising interest rates (duration risk).

The current combination of very low yields and term premia (compensation for holding long maturity bonds over shorter bonds) means bond holders are being poorly compensated for bearing duration risk as a form of risk diversification. The issue is compounded for passive bond investments as benchmark index duration has extended (taking more risk), while average yields have declined (less return) creating an asymmetric risk of capital losses from rising interest rates.

Source: Ardea, Bloomberg

Even in the scenarios where bonds perform as intended, it is expensive to passively hold them at present for risk diversification.

But it could be worse

The underestimated scenario – nascent inflationary pressures become more established – would quickly shift focus to fear of inflation overshooting, forcing aggressive, unexpected and disruptive normalisation of monetary policy. Bonds then become the catalyst for a broader asset class sell-off, rather than acting as a defensive risk diversifier.

We got a small taste of what such unanticipated policy tightening can do to markets during the ‘taper tantrum’ in 2013. Ben Bernanke unexpectedly announced the possibility of reducing the US Federal Reserve’s bond buying programme, causing bond prices to drop sharply and triggering a sell-off in equities. The chart below shows how the Australian bond-equity correlation behaved before and after this event – becoming more positive, more often, and thus less reliable as a diversifying relationship.

ASX 200 vs. AU Govt. Bond Correlation

Source: Ardea, Bloomberg

In fact, this marked change is not unique to Australia or to recent history. Very long-term US data shows that bond-equity correlations are unstable, tending to be impacted by inflation and interest rate paradigm shifts.

5-year rolling bond yield - equity correlation (daily returns)

Source: Ardea, Shiller, R. Source data for Irrational Exuberance, 1871 to present.

Irrespective of whether we are in a paradigm shift in bond-equity correlations or not, the conclusion remains the same. The assumed negative correlation between bonds and equities is not as reliable as hoped for.

The implication for portfolio construction is clear. Investors should evaluate conventional assumption that passively owning government bonds is inherently defensive and risk diversifying.

More to fixed income than buy and hold

There’s more to fixed income than just buying and holding bonds. It is an asset class with a wide range of instruments, strategies and return sources that can be exploited to achieve genuine risk diversification. For example, the same factors that distorted bond market valuations have also created relative value pricing anomalies, underpriced volatility, skewed risk premia and offered cheap tail risk opportunities that can all be used for effective risk diversification in a truly defensive fixed income portfolio.

So yes, fixed income can still diversify portfolio risk but only if you choose the right strategy.

 

Gopi Karunakaran is a Portfolio Manager at Ardea Investment Management, a boutique fund manager in alliance with Fidante Partners. Fidante is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. The information in this article is general in nature and is not intended to constitute advice or a securities recommendation.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

How bonds may temper equity market disappointment

Why 2020 has been the year of the bond market

Is gold a growth or defensive asset?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.