Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 319

ETFs and the art of portfolio rebalancing

Determining how to spread your funds across investment asset classes of varying risk and potential return is one of the most important investment decisions you will make.

Ensuring that this allocation continues to meet your risk-return preferences is another challenge, as investments can produce different returns over time and their significance within your portfolio can change. Your desired blend of risk and return can also change over time, as personal circumstances – like nearing retirement or having a family – evolve.

Having a lot invested in equities will likely mean your long-run returns will be higher, but also that you will have to endure volatility along the way. By contrast, allocating a large proportion of your funds to relatively less volatile cash or bonds may mean you sacrifice returns in exchange for greater capital stability.

Ideally, the aim is to have an asset allocation that gets the balance between high and low-risk assets right for you – both now and over time.

The need for portfolio rebalancing

The problem is that asset allocation is not a ‘set and forget’ decision. Your exposure changes as markets move. A strong run in equities will mean the share of your portfolio invested in ‘high-risk’ assets (shares) will increase, making your portfolio more volatile. This may be inconsistent with your desired risk/return profile.

The aim of rebalancing is to adjust your exposure to maintain your target asset allocation.

Another goal of rebalancing may be to preserve diversification within asset classes. For example, if you have significant exposure to bank stocks, and the banking sector has run particularly well, you may end up with an overweight position. You might decide to rebalance to other industry sectors to retain diversification across sectors. The same principle applies to country or regional diversification.

Rebalancing is called for not just when your asset allocation moves out of alignment with your risk profile, but also as your risk profile itself changes over time. For example, it’s generally recognised that as an investor ages, capital preservation, income stability and risk management become relatively more important than they were in the investor’s youth. As you approach retirement, you might seek to de-risk by decreasing your exposure to equities and increasing exposure to cash or bonds.

Portfolio rebalancing can feel counterintuitive

One challenge in rebalancing is knowing when to do it and what to buy and sell.

Rebalancing often essentially involves ‘selling your winners’, which seems to go against an investing rule of thumb to ‘take your losses and let your profits run’. That rule arguably applies more to individual stocks, which in some cases can show outperformance for long periods of time, than it does to asset classes. In the case of broad asset classes, however, there is typically a ‘regression to the mean’, in other words, periods of strong returns are often followed by periods of weak returns. For this reason alone, it can be prudent to trim exposure to asset classes that have run strongly for a period of time.

Research suggests that monthly or quarterly rebalancing is probably too frequent and can also involve excessive trading costs. It also is at odds with the fact that momentum within asset classes is often positive over periods up to 12 months.

By contrast, waiting several years is probably too long due to the regression to the mean principle.

A reasonable compromise is to rebalance around every 12 months. This also may offer tax advantages to eligible investors, as assets retained for more than 12 months are eligible for the capital gains discount when sold.

Another challenge is how to fund re-balancing, as selling one asset to buy another may realise capital gains and incur trading costs.

One option is to reserve income earned on existing assets to fund increased exposure to the desired asset. For example, dividends or distributions taken in cash, and income earned from cash and fixed interest investments, can be used to buy more stocks after a sharemarket decline which has reduced your exposure to equities, or conversely to increase your allocation to bonds/cash if equities have had a strong run and you find yourself with too much sharemarket exposure.

Individual stocks or bonds versus diversified funds

When rebalancing, investors must decide between two broad options:

  • buying individual stocks, bonds or other fixed interest investments, and
  • investing in a fund or managed investment that offers diversified exposure to the desired asset class.

The challenge of buying individual stocks or bonds is that a lot of research may be called for, and to ensure you have sufficient diversification you will need to spread your funds across several products within the asset class, which can increase trading costs. There is also the risk that you may get the asset class ‘right’ but choose the ‘wrong’ investments within the asset class, resulting in underperformance.

Managed funds, Listed Investment Companies (LICs) or Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) can offer broad diversification in one trade. ETFs also offer relatively low costs, for example, the ASX:A200 fund gives you broad exposure to the Australian market for an annual management cost of only 0.07% per annum.

ETFs can also allow you, in one or a few trades, to adjust exposure to international equities, or to sectors of the market, for example the Financials or Resources sector. For example, investors in technology can use ASX:NDQ, our NASDAQ 100 ETF.

The benefit of funds like these is that you don’t have to pick which bank/mining/technology stock to buy. You get cost-effective, diversified exposure to the desired sector/region/market in one trade, making portfolio rebalancing simple to achieve.

ETFs also offer attractive options to investors looking to increase their allocation to more defensive assets. It is now straightforward to achieve diversified exposure to corporate or government bonds, assets that previously were hard for individual investors to access, meaning you don’t have to restrict yourself to cash or term deposits offered by the banks. Two examples from our range are ASX:CRED which aims to generate income higher than that paid on cash, term deposits or government bonds. Its returns have also tended to be negatively correlated with equities, helping with portfolio diversification. Or the Active ETF ASX:HBRD where investors gain access to a diversified portfolio of hybrid securities. 

 

David Bassanese is Chief Economist at BetaShares, which offers exchange traded products listed on the ASX. This article contains general information only and does not consider the investment circumstances of any individual. Nasdaq®, OMX®, Nasdaq-100®, and Nasdaq-100 Index®, are registered trademarks of The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. and are licensed for use by BetaShares.

BetaShares is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. For more articles and papers from BetaShares, please click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Understanding the benefits of rebalancing

The asymmetric value of gold for Australian investors

How rebalancing can help your portfolio

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.