Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 173

How rebalancing can help your portfolio

As with most things in life, it is the less exciting aspects of managing a portfolio such as rebalancing that turn out to be the most important. So what does rebalancing mean? Quite simply, it’s repositioning your portfolio back to target weights.

This is the first in a series exploring different methods to rebalance a portfolio. There are plenty of ways to do this, but here we start with the simplest method – calendar rebalancing, which means rebalancing over a set period of time, and it can be done at different time intervals.

'Set and forget' performs worst in this example

Assume we started in August 1996 with $100,000 to invest and run the analysis for 20 years. We chose four stocks – BHP Billiton (BHP), Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA), National Australia Bank (NAB) and Woolworths (WOW). We set our target weights at 30%, 20%, 20% and 30% respectively. This is not about portfolio construction, so for illustrative purposes four stocks is enough.

We consider four scenarios; ‘Set and forget’, monthly, semi-annual and annual rebalancing. We rebalance our portfolio irrespective of what the stock price has done, what we think (or hope) it’s going to do and simply buy or sell shares at the calendar end of the period to take our target weights back to our starting position. With calendar rebalancing, there is no emotion.

‘Set and forget’ lets us down here with a final portfolio value of $523,000.

Source: FactSet, Owners Advisory, September 2016 (Click to enlarge)

However, simply rebalancing the portfolio (albeit a very simple portfolio) monthly gives a final portfolio value of $587,000, semi-annual rebalancing gives a final portfolio of $545,000, and for this portfolio, annual rebalancing adds no value. The total returns for these portfolios are shown in the table below:

The performance difference from rebalancing is significant, particularly over a long period of time. Why? Let’s look at two of these scenarios and the weights through time to show the story.

‘Set and forget’ weights through time impact performance

Source: FactSet, Owners Advisory, September 2016

‘Monthly rebalancing’ holds our exposures largely constant through time

Source: FactSet, Owners Advisory, September 2016

Looking at the weights through time we see that, should we just set and forget, Woolworths becomes a large position in our portfolio. In fact, our dollar holding in the set and forget portfolio increases to over 50% of our portfolio.

In our monthly rebalancing, we begin to see why rebalancing performs the best for a concentrated stock portfolio. By design, we buy stocks when they have fallen below our target weight and we sell stocks when they have risen above our target weight. We are implementing the ‘trader’s catch-cry’ of buying low and selling high simply because we have held true to the weights we started with.

The second reason why rebalancing helps is it is the simplest method of portfolio risk control. Consider WOW: in the set and forget portfolio, we have let our best performers run, which is a very tempting way to manage a stock portfolio. But looking at what happens when WOW reprices reveals the other side of why a rebalancing regime helps overall portfolio performance.

By 2015, in the ‘set and forget’ portfolio the dollar holdings in WOW has risen to approximately $400,000, as opposed to around $200,000 in the monthly rebalanced portfolio

Source: FactSet, Owners Advisory, September 2016

Woolworths fell 9.5% on 26 to 27 February 2015, costing us 4.5% in the entire portfolio on the day ($30,000 in dollar terms). However, in those portfolios where we have controlled our total exposure to a single stock, we see that while we still suffer a loss, it is only 2.5% of the portfolio’s value ($18,000 in dollar terms).

Simply having the discipline to hold shares at predetermined weights can go a long way to adding value to the total portfolio’s returns over the long term.

In the next instalment, we look at using the percentage deviation from target weights as our rebalancing trigger to see whether we can improve our overall portfolio performance by being just a little bit more sophisticated.

 

Leah Kelly is Portfolio Manager at Owners Advisory. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

6 Comments
Errol Davey
August 17, 2019

The figures would be vastly different if the 20 year period was from 1999 to 2019, WOW is now $36.00.

Ramon Vasquez
February 11, 2018

Hi Everyone ...

Thanks very much for the article , especially as l have been to much of a trader ,but am now approaching retirement age and need to change my style accordingly .


Would it be possible to make a comparison similar to the outline and some querical objections , against an EQUALLY WEIGHTED portfolio of the same four stocks , l wonder ???

Best wishes , Ramon Vasquez .

Kevin
September 17, 2016

Rebalancing always baffled me,the high costs of churning as others have pointed out.Shooting the horse that wins the race to feed it to the ones that lost,weird.Should we not just let winners run?

I would have no problem with a concentrated portfolio,looking for the end result and the magic of compounding.The dividends they would bring in after retirement.

Have dividends been reinvested as the total seems a bit low.If they have then CBA would now be far ahead of all the rest of that portfolio,probably with a good performance from WOW.

I remember reading the 'Top stocks ' book in the early 1990s,I forget the name of the guy that writes it.Of 10 stocks I think 3 of them went bust,but the silly thing was,he had sold out of Westfield.Westfield had swamped the rest of the portfolio and was worth more than all the other shares put together.Preaching the necessity to rebalance so the portfolio was not concentrated.

I would what Frank Lowy's answer would be if somebody told him he was silly for not rebalancing,just a thought.

gismo
September 16, 2016

Furthermore, were trading costs included? I think they would have been relatively significant to the monthly re-balancing portfolio.

Leah
September 15, 2016

Hi - thanks for your question. I will be looking at that in part 3 as yes - it certainly changes the numbers reported.

sandgroper
September 15, 2016

Hi Leah, capital gains tax (particularly for individuals but also for super) would be a major source of performance leakage from this strategy, have you looked at after-tax performance of rebalancing vs set and forget? Thanks

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Understanding the benefits of rebalancing

The asymmetric value of gold for Australian investors

ETFs and the art of portfolio rebalancing

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.