Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 617

A steady road to getting rich

The lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals and families published annually by different media organisations are generally an interesting read.

Ranking them by their net wealth, they show that many of the richest Australians have progressively become richer over time through a combination of business expansion, market forces and shrewd investment decisions.

In fact, looking at the aggregate data compiled over the last five years alone, the estimated combined wealth of the top 200 wealthiest people in Australia has jumped by around 50% to over $670 billion.

Australia’s top ranks include individuals involved in resources, property, information technology, and investing. One could describe them as a diversified group of investors.

Yet, the real story behind the rich list rankings only becomes apparent when one digs a little deeper and compares how individual fortunes have changed from year to year.

The overall numbers have continued to increase, but the wealth gains by individuals have certainly not been uniform over time. In fact, among the top rankings, individual wealth levels have tended to shift up and down by billions of dollars from year to year.

Some individuals and families have managed to increase their fortunes every year, without fail. But others, because of unfavourable market conditions, poor investment decisions or a combination of both, have suffered losses over the same time and slipped down the overall rankings. Some have even fallen off the rich list entirely.


Source: Wikipedia, Financial Review Rich List [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_Review_Rich_List]

With the benefit of hindsight, those people may have chosen to do things differently.

Following a managed investment strategy

For example, as contrarian as it may sound, had the latter cohort – those who have slipped down or off the wealth rankings entirely – simply adhered to a managed investment strategy over the last five years instead of pursuing their business interests, their net worth now may actually be higher than it was in May 2020.

And the numbers supporting this strategy are even more compelling over longer periods of time, thanks to the compounding growth on global share markets.

To illustrate this point, let’s compare the unit price returns over five years of three different Vanguard equities-based exchange traded funds (ETFs) based on an initial $10,000 investment back in April 2020.

They are the Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (VAS), the Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF (VGS), and the Vanguard U.S. Total Market Shares Index ETF (VTS).

These particular ETFs have been chosen for illustrative purposes only because each closely tracks the broad performances of share markets in different parts of the world.

Here are the results, with the table below showing what a $10,000 investment made in May 2020 , during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, would have been worth on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) at 31 May 2025.

This data is based on each fund’s month-end net asset value (NAV), which is the value of its investments divided by the number of units in the fund. NAV movements give a good indicator of the historical performance of a fund, but they won't exactly match the returns you see as an investor. That's because your performance experience is based on the buy price (the price at which you buy into a fund) and the sell price (the price at which you sell).

The unit price returns exclude income distributions that were received by investors over the period.

Staying the course

What the numbers demonstrate is that, over the last five years, many investors using broad-based index funds that invest in different equities markets would have been well ahead by now, even without making any additional investments along the way.

Inputting higher initial deposit numbers, making regular investments in the same ETFs, and the reinvestment of distributions would obviously have produced even more impressive total returns.

And keep in mind that the last five years has included significant volatility following COVID and during the more recent economic, geopolitical and trade events.

The Vanguard Index Chart provides a much longer perspective over the last 30 years, showing the growth of different investment classes and how a starting balance of $10,000 would have changed in value after being invested into each asset class.

It’s a valuable lesson that at least some Australian rich listers have taken on board. In addition to expanding their business interests, it has been reported certain individuals have been investing heavily into ASX-listed and foreign-listed ETFs.

One could say they are hedging their investment bets.

 

Tony Kaye is a Senior Personal Finance writer at Vanguard Australia, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider the investment objectives, financial situation or needs of any individual.

For more articles and papers from Vanguard Investments Australia, please click here.

 

  •   25 June 2025
  • 10
  •      
  •   
10 Comments
Franco
June 26, 2025

Tony agree staying the course leads to compounding. However starting in May 2020 makes returns look great as this was a low point during Covid. Reminds me of something i read about the best long term results of individual investors in USA. It stated that they had passed away and no one had realised, their portfolios compounded.

Dudley
June 26, 2025

"passed away and no one had realised, their portfolios compounded": Dead men don't draw down.

Franco
June 27, 2025

True Dudley, that was an idea on the affect of compounding which does occur in Super to a large extent as its taxed at 15 % until retirement. If it Grows at 8% and you draw down 5% after retirement it will last along time.
However if you want to leave it all the children they may be a little less wealthy if you live too long.

Phil Kennon KC
June 27, 2025

$10,000 invested in VAS probably matches VGS and VTS returns over the period for an SMSF member in pension mode getting the benefit of 100 % franking.
So need to compare apples with apples.
Phil Kennon KC

David A
July 01, 2025

Vas 100% Franking?

Scott
June 29, 2025

Now divide those returns by either M2 or M3 and report back about ‘wealth creation’ and the cantillion effect.

Wildcat
June 29, 2025

As Franco points out convenient starting date, this is disingenuous.

Moreover it assumes 100% exposure to shares. This is also disingenuous. Very few people have this degree of beta risk in their portfolios. This is even less so of the very wealthy. They are typically very conservative.

The modelling also assumes zero taxation on annual income and/or realised cgt inside the trusts.

There’s nothing remotely relevant in this article other than the concept of comparing options. The actual analysis is so flawed it’s meaningless.

Kevin
June 29, 2025

It's the ideal time to start,the start of a decade.Everybody says you buy low,then they don't do that .
The years to start for this decade were 2000, 2010, 2020.A decade gives you a better picture.I'm still annoyed that companies stopped giving a 10 year history in their annual reports. The only one continuing that practice in my portfolio is Macbank,that 10 year history is great. No matter what information people are presented with the answer will always be 'you can't do that'.

Steve
June 29, 2025

Divorce had a major impact on Forrest & Cannon-Brookes, not mentioned here. Also, investors in Hub24 or Pinnacle would have thrashed any Index Fund investment over the past 5 years. Index Funds are the bare minimum return one should expect.

Kevin
June 29, 2025

Almost 10 years of 'you can't do that', 'those companies will go bust'. The Vanguard chart explains exactly what people refuse to see and don't want to know about.
Compounding.
I found the margin loan statement for 30/6/16.I'd put them back into the plastic protector in the wrong order. It is 2016 purely because the margin loan was taken out around 1995 or 1996. So 10 year periods from then on.That first statement is the start of the 10 year period we are in now. The 3 big drivers and NAB . All 30/6/16 start date
CBA $74.37 each
Macbank $68. 90 each
WES $40.10.

NAB ( head in hands ) $25.43 each .

Spin outs were Macbank spun out Sydney airport,that may have been earlier than 2016,SYD isn't on the list because I just told them to sell them.
WES spun out Coles, so that price would need to be added to the WES price.The spin out was 1 for 1.
NAB spun out Virgin money on a 1 for 4 basis.
So in 9 years you've tripled your money on those 4 shares easily.

I'm nearly certain somebody said compounding is the 8th wonder of the world.I wonder if those companies will be around for the rest of my life,I think they will. As the statements are mid decade they are great for 25 years periods 2000 to 2025,then 2025 to 2050.

That Vanguard chart is great to show what needs to be understood,long term compounding. As Tony said,the bigger the number is at the start,the bigger the number is at the end,I think the margin loan started at $100K for me back then,then it worked in tandem with a line of credit on a property taken out earlier than the margin loan

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Shaky markets, steady mind

Winning by not losing: The silver rule of investing

The BIG picture: portfolios perform for the passive and patient

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian stocks will crush housing over the next decade, 2025 edition

Two years ago, I wrote an article suggesting that the odds favoured ASX shares easily outperforming residential property over the next decade. Here’s an update on where things stand today.

Building a lazy ETF portfolio in 2026

What are the best ways to build a simple portfolio from scratch? I’ve addressed this issue before but think it’s worth revisiting given markets and the world have since changed, throwing up new challenges and things to consider.

Get set for a bumpy 2026

At this time last year, I forecast that 2025 would likely be a positive year given strong economic prospects and disinflation. The outlook for this year is less clear cut and here is what investors should do.

Meg on SMSFs: First glimpse of revised Division 296 tax

Treasury has released draft legislation for a new version of the controversial $3 million super tax. It's a significant improvement on the original proposal but there are some stings in the tail.

Property versus shares - a practical guide for investors

I’ve been comparing property and shares for decades and while both have their place, the differences are stark. When tax, costs, and liquidity are weighed, property looks less compelling than its reputation suggests.

10 fearless forecasts for 2026

The predictions include dividends will outstrip growth as a source of Australian equity returns, US market performance will be underwhelming, while US government bonds will beat gold.

Latest Updates

Economy

Ray Dalio on 2025’s real story, Trump, and what’s next

The renowned investor says 2025’s real story wasn’t AI or US stocks but the shift away from American assets and a collapse in the value of money. And he outlines how to best position portfolios for what’s ahead.

Superannuation

No, Division 296 does not tax franking credits twice

Claims that Division 296 double-taxes franking credits misunderstand imputation: franking credits are SMSF income, not company tax, and ensure earnings are taxed once at the correct rate.

Investment strategies

Who will get left holding the banks?

For the first time in decades, the Big 4 banks have real competition in home loans. Macquarie is quickly gain market share, which threatens both the earnings and dividends of the major banks in the years ahead.

Investment strategies

AI economic scenarios: revolutionary growth, or recessionary bubble?

Investor focus is turning increasingly to AI-related risks: is it a bubble about to burst, tipping the US into recession? Or is it the onset of a third industrial revolution? And what would either scenario mean for markets?

Investment strategies

The long-term case for compounders

Cyclical stocks surge in upswings but falter in downturns. Compounders - reliable, scalable, resilient businesses - offer smoother, superior returns over the full investment cycle for patient investors.

Property

AREITs are not as passive as you may think

A-REITs are often viewed as passive rental vehicles, but today’s index tells a different story. Development and funds management now dominate earnings, materially increasing volatility and risk for the sector.

Australia’s quiet dairy boom — and the investment opportunity

Dairy farming offers real asset exposure, steady income and long-term growth, yet remains overlooked by investors seeking diversification beyond traditional asset classes.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.