Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 36

Getting the most from your age pension

While conducting a client review last week, I came across a strategy that might have some application for others. The story also has some good lessons about investing for the long term.

The background story

Let me tell you about Paul. At age 62, Paul received a $550,000 inheritance from his mother and came to us for advice in 2007. By October 2007, the advice was complete and he made a $450,000 non-concessional contribution to a superannuation account in a wrap service and immediately invested in a portfolio of direct Australian shares (the All Ords was about 6,650 at the time) with some allocated to cash.

By March 2009, with markets hit by the GFC, at age 64, the super fund balance was $292,056 (All Ords about 3,100). He had not made any further contributions. Paul needed income, so he started an account-based pension, staying invested for the transition. The share portfolio did not need to be sold down and re-bought. You can do that with a wrap service, one of the many reasons they can be an interesting alternative to an SMSF.

Through the subsequent years, Paul’s share portfolio, although prima facie down in value, continued to pay dividends. The account’s share portfolio generated enough dividends supported by the cash allocation to meet all fees and the pension payments. He wasn’t forced to sell down the shares, nor did he sell down out of panic.

Fast forward to today. Paul’s account balance is back up to $360,000 (All Ords about 5,200), and he has received $117,000 in pension payments along the way. If he had panicked and sold down all his shares to cash, it would be a very different story for him.

Paul remained focussed on the dividends and being an investor in the businesses he owned a share of. He was invested in good companies in important industry sectors, with strong balance sheets making strong profits and paying reliable dividends. If a company no longer met those criteria, he listened to advice and then and only then would he sell to reinvest into companies that did.

The Income Test kicker

Paul is married and claims a part age pension assessed under the Income Test. Account-based pensions are not deemed for the Income Test. (In the May 2013 Federal Budget, the Labor Government proposed to ‘deem’ new account-based pensions that commenced on or after 1 July 2015. At the time of writing, no legislation has been drafted, and the Coalition Government’s stance on this issue is unclear). The pension income drawn is assessable by Centrelink; however, it is reduced by a ‘deductible amount’. This deductible amount is calculated as the purchase price divided by the member’s life expectancy at the time of purchase. For Paul, this formula worked out to be: $292,056 / 22.85 = $12,781

With Paul drawing an annual income of $36,000, Centrelink assessed him as receiving $23,218 assessable income from the account-based pension, and that was really hitting his and his wife’s age pension benefits.

Now that Paul’s account balance has come up again, and his life expectancy is lower because he’s aged a few years (it is now 15.49 years), we have decided to re-set the account-based pension so that the deductible amount formula is now: $360,000 / 15.49 = $23,241.

Of the $36,000 a year he is drawing, Centrelink will now only count $12,759 and as a result his age pension income will go up by as much as $172 a fortnight.

How does he re-set his account-based pension? He just rolls from his current account to a new account-based pension in the same wrap service. Again, in his case, there is no selling down of investments to then re-buy them (and in the process incurring brokerage charges). With his wrap account, the shares he already owns are transferred to his new pension account: it’s just a matter of paperwork. You can do that with a wrap service, and in fact you can also do it within your SMSF – it just requires paperwork.

With the markets recovering, if you are a part pensioner assessed under the Income Test and have an allocated or account-based pension, check with your adviser to see if it’s worth re-setting the deductible amount to improve your Income Test. It’s a quick and easy calculation with great ongoing potential benefits.

Alex Denham was Head of Technical Services at Challenger Financial Services and is now Senior Adviser at Dartnall Advisers.


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Hey baby boomers, pension is not a dirty word

A fundamental flaw in the Australian retirement system?

The state of play in the funds management industry

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.