Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 36

Getting the most from your age pension

While conducting a client review last week, I came across a strategy that might have some application for others. The story also has some good lessons about investing for the long term.

The background story

Let me tell you about Paul. At age 62, Paul received a $550,000 inheritance from his mother and came to us for advice in 2007. By October 2007, the advice was complete and he made a $450,000 non-concessional contribution to a superannuation account in a wrap service and immediately invested in a portfolio of direct Australian shares (the All Ords was about 6,650 at the time) with some allocated to cash.

By March 2009, with markets hit by the GFC, at age 64, the super fund balance was $292,056 (All Ords about 3,100). He had not made any further contributions. Paul needed income, so he started an account-based pension, staying invested for the transition. The share portfolio did not need to be sold down and re-bought. You can do that with a wrap service, one of the many reasons they can be an interesting alternative to an SMSF.

Through the subsequent years, Paul’s share portfolio, although prima facie down in value, continued to pay dividends. The account’s share portfolio generated enough dividends supported by the cash allocation to meet all fees and the pension payments. He wasn’t forced to sell down the shares, nor did he sell down out of panic.

Fast forward to today. Paul’s account balance is back up to $360,000 (All Ords about 5,200), and he has received $117,000 in pension payments along the way. If he had panicked and sold down all his shares to cash, it would be a very different story for him.

Paul remained focussed on the dividends and being an investor in the businesses he owned a share of. He was invested in good companies in important industry sectors, with strong balance sheets making strong profits and paying reliable dividends. If a company no longer met those criteria, he listened to advice and then and only then would he sell to reinvest into companies that did.

The Income Test kicker

Paul is married and claims a part age pension assessed under the Income Test. Account-based pensions are not deemed for the Income Test. (In the May 2013 Federal Budget, the Labor Government proposed to ‘deem’ new account-based pensions that commenced on or after 1 July 2015. At the time of writing, no legislation has been drafted, and the Coalition Government’s stance on this issue is unclear). The pension income drawn is assessable by Centrelink; however, it is reduced by a ‘deductible amount’. This deductible amount is calculated as the purchase price divided by the member’s life expectancy at the time of purchase. For Paul, this formula worked out to be: $292,056 / 22.85 = $12,781

With Paul drawing an annual income of $36,000, Centrelink assessed him as receiving $23,218 assessable income from the account-based pension, and that was really hitting his and his wife’s age pension benefits.

Now that Paul’s account balance has come up again, and his life expectancy is lower because he’s aged a few years (it is now 15.49 years), we have decided to re-set the account-based pension so that the deductible amount formula is now: $360,000 / 15.49 = $23,241.

Of the $36,000 a year he is drawing, Centrelink will now only count $12,759 and as a result his age pension income will go up by as much as $172 a fortnight.

How does he re-set his account-based pension? He just rolls from his current account to a new account-based pension in the same wrap service. Again, in his case, there is no selling down of investments to then re-buy them (and in the process incurring brokerage charges). With his wrap account, the shares he already owns are transferred to his new pension account: it’s just a matter of paperwork. You can do that with a wrap service, and in fact you can also do it within your SMSF – it just requires paperwork.

With the markets recovering, if you are a part pensioner assessed under the Income Test and have an allocated or account-based pension, check with your adviser to see if it’s worth re-setting the deductible amount to improve your Income Test. It’s a quick and easy calculation with great ongoing potential benefits.

 

Alex Denham was Head of Technical Services at Challenger Financial Services and is now Senior Adviser at Dartnall Advisers.

 

  •   17 October 2013
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Hey baby boomers, pension is not a dirty word

A fundamental flaw in the Australian retirement system?

Should I pay off the mortgage or top up my superannuation?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.