Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 321

How to spot genuine pricing power

Hypergrowth and crushed expectations are usually the investing themes that capture the most flattering financial press. A much less visible but even more powerful lever for the long-term investor, though, comes in the form of pricing power.

Businesses with a confluence of a strong brand, competitive position, and customer loyalty are often able to push through price increases alongside or even above inflation. Even if only applied with prudence, the ability to grow pricing at healthy rates speaks to the potential to surprise investors with higher-for-longer growth than short-term-minded investors might expect.

Start by inverting

One of the fastest routes to identifying businesses with pricing power is by inverting and screening out the price takers. For example, just about every commodity-centric business, from mining to farming, lacks pricing power because its products aren’t materially differentiated, and most end buyers don’t care about the sourcing. You probably care about who manufactured your shoes – branding matters in footwear – but probably never stopped to ask where the rubber in them was sourced from.

There are gradations when it comes to pricing power with commodities, of course, mostly having due to the concentration of supply and how long it takes new supply to come online. But a steel manufacturer looking to buy a certain grade of iron ore doesn’t much care whether it was dug from the earth by, say, Rio Tinto or BHP Billiton, and the huge majority of commodity producers are price takers.

Retailers are another group that struggles to retain pricing power because barriers to entry are low and clever concepts are easily and quickly copied. The largest players can lean on suppliers for better terms, but even they struggle to flex pricing power with customers. They later resort to ‘investing in price’ in order to win back market share. Incidentally, shares of Woolworths today are no higher than they were six years ago.

Australia’s big banks are not immune to market forces either despite the oligopolistic nature of the sector. It’s a pain to change banks, thus they set their fees accordingly, but when it comes to setting rates it is largely set market forces that dictate their levels and the size of spreads.

Go positive on who has the power

So we just struck off financial, energy and materials businesses, which wipes away more than half the opportunity set by value of the ASX. Also, much of what was said above is applicable to companies in other sectors as well, all of which should give you a better feel for the rarity of true pricing power.

The first thing you should know when trying to spot pricing power is that most companies that have it don’t advertise the fact -- even with investors -- because doing so might rub customers, suppliers, and regulators the wrong way. Large consumer companies aren’t shy in discussing pricing – Procter & Gamble, for example – mostly because the prices themselves are public and the customer base is so diffused. Once you get past that low-hanging fruit it takes more thought and digging to spot pricing power.

The next best place to catch management discussing pricing strategy is to get on an analyst conference call. Almost every mid- and large-cap company, plus many small-caps, host a conference call after they release earnings results that investors of all stripes can listen to (details are usually found in the earnings release or announced prior). While a company might not be so brazen as to directly say how much increased prices contributed to their growth during the period, they often provide useful colour that can help investors get a sense of whether pricing power exists.

Beyond a company out-and-out saying pricing power exists, investors can read between the lines of some financial measures. For example, if a business has high and stable gross margins, consistent revenue growth, and is showing no signs of losing market share, odds are decent the business has some degree of pricing power. Netflix is a prime example. The price of its standard streaming plan in the US increased from US$9 in 2014 to US$13 in 2019, over which its gross margin expanded by around 5% to over 36% and total revenue more than tripled.

Take note that just because a business has a premium brand or higher gross margins than its peers does not mean the business has pricing power. A luxury automaker probably has higher gross margins than one more focused on value and volume, for example, but the luxury automaker also has a smaller revenue base over which it can leverage its fixed costs, plus automaking is an intensely cyclical and capital-hungry business. That is to say, even if a luxury automaker has relative pricing power, it doesn’t mean they have absolute pricing power. In fact, in the US, prices for new vehicles basically haven’t budged over the past two decades despite total inflation of around 50% over that time.

Another quantitative directional indicator is based on average revenue per customer. If it is increasing faster than inflation and without driving down customer-level churn, it means the company is effectively raising prices or leveraging an existing strong relationship to cross or up sell, or some mix of both. A good example that is close to home is Xero, where churn rates in the core ANZ region fell a touch year-on-year despite a 4.8% constant currency increase in average revenue per user.

When the price is wrong

Just because a business has pricing power does not automatically make its shares a buy, of course. Numerous factors go into that sort of analysis, and even within pricing power itself it is important to watch the key underlying trends. For example, if a company is able to broaden its supply base or its own market is concentrating behind fewer players, both those trends bode well for pricing power. Likewise, if a company has been flexing its pricing power too hard for too long it can open itself up to disruption by more efficient competitors who compete on price and value rather than brand and prestige.

All that said, we think pricing power is a valuable trait for a business to possess for the long-term investor.


Joe Magyer is Chief Investment Officer of Lakehouse Capital, and Portfolio Manager of two unlisted funds, the Lakehouse Small Companies Fund and the Lakehouse Global Growth Fund. This article contains general investment information only (under AFSL 400691) and has been prepared without taking account of the reader’s financial situation. The Lakehouse Small Companies Fund owns shares of Xero.

Lakehouse Capital is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. For more articles and papers by Lakehouse, please click here.



It’s the large stocks driving fund misery

Longest positive run for Australian shares since WWII

Why August company reporting season was poor


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.