Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 321

How to spot genuine pricing power

Hypergrowth and crushed expectations are usually the investing themes that capture the most flattering financial press. A much less visible but even more powerful lever for the long-term investor, though, comes in the form of pricing power.

Businesses with a confluence of a strong brand, competitive position, and customer loyalty are often able to push through price increases alongside or even above inflation. Even if only applied with prudence, the ability to grow pricing at healthy rates speaks to the potential to surprise investors with higher-for-longer growth than short-term-minded investors might expect.

Start by inverting

One of the fastest routes to identifying businesses with pricing power is by inverting and screening out the price takers. For example, just about every commodity-centric business, from mining to farming, lacks pricing power because its products aren’t materially differentiated, and most end buyers don’t care about the sourcing. You probably care about who manufactured your shoes – branding matters in footwear – but probably never stopped to ask where the rubber in them was sourced from.

There are gradations when it comes to pricing power with commodities, of course, mostly having due to the concentration of supply and how long it takes new supply to come online. But a steel manufacturer looking to buy a certain grade of iron ore doesn’t much care whether it was dug from the earth by, say, Rio Tinto or BHP Billiton, and the huge majority of commodity producers are price takers.

Retailers are another group that struggles to retain pricing power because barriers to entry are low and clever concepts are easily and quickly copied. The largest players can lean on suppliers for better terms, but even they struggle to flex pricing power with customers. They later resort to ‘investing in price’ in order to win back market share. Incidentally, shares of Woolworths today are no higher than they were six years ago.

Australia’s big banks are not immune to market forces either despite the oligopolistic nature of the sector. It’s a pain to change banks, thus they set their fees accordingly, but when it comes to setting rates it is largely set market forces that dictate their levels and the size of spreads.

Go positive on who has the power

So we just struck off financial, energy and materials businesses, which wipes away more than half the opportunity set by value of the ASX. Also, much of what was said above is applicable to companies in other sectors as well, all of which should give you a better feel for the rarity of true pricing power.

The first thing you should know when trying to spot pricing power is that most companies that have it don’t advertise the fact -- even with investors -- because doing so might rub customers, suppliers, and regulators the wrong way. Large consumer companies aren’t shy in discussing pricing – Procter & Gamble, for example – mostly because the prices themselves are public and the customer base is so diffused. Once you get past that low-hanging fruit it takes more thought and digging to spot pricing power.

The next best place to catch management discussing pricing strategy is to get on an analyst conference call. Almost every mid- and large-cap company, plus many small-caps, host a conference call after they release earnings results that investors of all stripes can listen to (details are usually found in the earnings release or announced prior). While a company might not be so brazen as to directly say how much increased prices contributed to their growth during the period, they often provide useful colour that can help investors get a sense of whether pricing power exists.

Beyond a company out-and-out saying pricing power exists, investors can read between the lines of some financial measures. For example, if a business has high and stable gross margins, consistent revenue growth, and is showing no signs of losing market share, odds are decent the business has some degree of pricing power. Netflix is a prime example. The price of its standard streaming plan in the US increased from US$9 in 2014 to US$13 in 2019, over which its gross margin expanded by around 5% to over 36% and total revenue more than tripled.

Take note that just because a business has a premium brand or higher gross margins than its peers does not mean the business has pricing power. A luxury automaker probably has higher gross margins than one more focused on value and volume, for example, but the luxury automaker also has a smaller revenue base over which it can leverage its fixed costs, plus automaking is an intensely cyclical and capital-hungry business. That is to say, even if a luxury automaker has relative pricing power, it doesn’t mean they have absolute pricing power. In fact, in the US, prices for new vehicles basically haven’t budged over the past two decades despite total inflation of around 50% over that time.

Another quantitative directional indicator is based on average revenue per customer. If it is increasing faster than inflation and without driving down customer-level churn, it means the company is effectively raising prices or leveraging an existing strong relationship to cross or up sell, or some mix of both. A good example that is close to home is Xero, where churn rates in the core ANZ region fell a touch year-on-year despite a 4.8% constant currency increase in average revenue per user.

When the price is wrong

Just because a business has pricing power does not automatically make its shares a buy, of course. Numerous factors go into that sort of analysis, and even within pricing power itself it is important to watch the key underlying trends. For example, if a company is able to broaden its supply base or its own market is concentrating behind fewer players, both those trends bode well for pricing power. Likewise, if a company has been flexing its pricing power too hard for too long it can open itself up to disruption by more efficient competitors who compete on price and value rather than brand and prestige.

All that said, we think pricing power is a valuable trait for a business to possess for the long-term investor.

 

Joe Magyer is Chief Investment Officer of Lakehouse Capital, and Portfolio Manager of two unlisted funds, the Lakehouse Small Companies Fund and the Lakehouse Global Growth Fund. This article contains general investment information only (under AFSL 400691) and has been prepared without taking account of the reader’s financial situation. The Lakehouse Small Companies Fund owns shares of Xero.

Lakehouse Capital is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. For more articles and papers by Lakehouse, please click here.

 

  •   28 August 2019
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

It’s the large stocks driving fund misery

Maintaining dividend income in turbulent times

ASX large cap outlook for 2025

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.