Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 96

Investing and bike riding share similar cycles

Cycling, whether for commuting, recreation or fitness, has never been more popular. It crosses the gender divide and can be enjoyed across the age spectrum, from the young on training wheels to MAMILs (middle-aged males in lycra) astride carbon-fibre rigs costing more than some compact cars.

Road cycling has garnered an enthusiastic following amongst the corporate set, particularly within the investment community. Some say it’s the new golf. Attending the recent Tour Down Under professional cycling event in Adelaide I was struck by the number of bankers, brokers, fund managers and advisors who have embraced road cycling culture. This confluence of cycling and investing started me thinking about important parallels between the two.

1. Keep pedalling in tough conditions

Cycling enthusiasts, like investors, must deal with variability. Every seasoned rider knows that conditions at departure will rarely hold for an entire ride. Many a time I have been out in ideal conditions, rolling with a gentle tail breeze, only for the weather to shift unexpectedly. Confronted by brooding skies and a block headwind, what minutes earlier seemed effortless suddenly becomes difficult.

When faced with headwinds seasoned cyclists hunker down and push steadily on, if not quite as rapidly. They accept cycling’s intrinsic variability and are prepared to persevere when conditions deteriorate. More often than not, things change and the pedalling gets easier again. There’s a lesson there for investors.

2. The difference between risk and uncertainty

Cyclists often have their favourite training rides mapped out: the route, the departure time and the expected ride duration. Route information is commonly shared amongst riders, each adding to the collective knowledge of traffic conditions, known road hazards and low or peak vehicular activity. This is risk management, with the historical frequency of negative events informing judgements about a ride’s riskiness.

Risk, however, is not uncertainty. Risk is measurable whilst uncertainty isn’t. Risk is akin to analysing historic data for a particular climb and adjusting your route based on cycling accident statistics. Uncertainty is descending such a climb and diving into a blind hairpin bend only to discover sand across your cornering line. Time spent rationally analysing route information now counts for naught. The response is instead instinctive, relying on ‘gut feel’ rather than analysis. Feather the brakes, pick your line and with luck on your side you may ride home unscathed. Panic, grab at the anchors and a world of pain awaits.

Prior to the global financial crisis many investors thought they were prudently managing risk, only to be blindsided by ‘unknown unknowns’. This schism was neatly summarised in a 2010 Reserve Bank speech: “One of the contributing factors to this mis-assessment was an over-reliance on a model-based approach to risk management, which focussed too much on measurable risk without taking full enough account of unmeasurable uncertainty.”

3. Passive and active approaches

In competitive road cycling riders generally bunch together in a formation called a peloton. By so doing riders can swap turns up front, with those sheltering behind enjoying a reduction in effort of up to 30%.

Whilst the peloton saves overall effort, it is common for individual riders to take a risk and break away, expending enormous energy in the hope of beating the pack to the line. Mostly these attacks (particularly solo efforts) prove futile. Occasionally however the extra effort pays off and a lone rider finishes ahead of the peloton. Seldom does the same rider succeed at consecutive breakaways. Breakaways are, in essence, a high effort, high payoff strategy with a low probability of repeated success.

In the world of investing the breakaway rider is akin to the active investor; one who is prepared to expend extra resources in order to beat the market. Active investors believe that markets are inefficient enough to allow them to get ahead and stay ahead. As with racing cyclists, active investors are buoyed by the prior success of other active participants, and although they rarely succeed in winning the tour, they have their moment in front of the cameras. Active strategies appear to work just often enough to encourage others to do the same.

4. Data, data everywhere

Road cycling today is a highly data-driven activity. Real-time data is generated from both rider and machine including power, cadence, heart rate, speed, rate of vertical ascent and other metrics too numerous to list. And so it is with investing. Investment data is now available in a 24 hour cycle at the click of a mouse or tap of a smartphone app.

This data reliance by both cyclist and investor stems from the same assumption; that if some information leads to improved decision-making, a great deal of information must result in optimal decisions, and thus superior performance.

Data availability is, however, a two-edged sword. When fatigued, trying to make sense of, and act coherently on, the multiple data sets spinning on my bike computer becomes problematic. And so it is with investing. Beyond some point, additional data only complicates the task of separating valuable investment signals from useless noise.

Come in spinner

Cycling and investing have much in common, moving forward as efficiently as possible on the road journey or the wealth journey. Both activities deal with dynamic systems (weather/markets) and both involve an element not just of risk, but of uncertainty. For the competitive there’s always the thrill of beating others and taking the top step on the podium.

As for me, I’ve mellowed from my speed-seeking younger days to embrace a more cyclo-tourist philosophy. Once addicted to the rush of high peaks and plunging descents, I now prefer gently rolling terrain. Sure, the destination’s important, but let’s enjoy the journey along the way.

 

Harry Chemay consults across superannuation and wealth management, focusing on post-retirement outcomes. He has previously practised as a specialist SMSF advisor, and as an investment consultant to APRA-regulated superannuation funds. Harry’s two decades of experience in finance and investments is exceeded by his three decades as a cycling tragic.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

The biggest and most ignored catalyst for emerging market stocks

The risks of market concentration and not staying invested

Diversification is not a free lunch

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.