Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 455

Investment performance and start date randomness

I’ve been the primary adviser to clients for 12 years, and my career in wealth management is approaching two decades. Each client hired me on a different date over those 12 years, and since I joined RWM four years ago, this has been at a pace of about one new client every month. As a result, they all have different start dates for calculating investment performance under my watch. I call this 'inception date roulette'. There’s an element of randomness that determines what the first few months or years of the client’s experience will be in terms of performance since the inception date. I never know when the next downturn in the market will be, but I am certain that a new client will hire me right before it.

Remember in 2011, when the S&P rating agency downgraded the debt rating of the U.S. government? Congress had a standoff over the debt ceiling at the time. Stocks sank 16% over a two-week period. I had just moved from New York to New Orleans and founded a solo advisory business. Guess when my first new client signed on? July 2011. We began that relationship with double-digit declines in their portfolio.

Remember the 20% market decline leading up to Christmas Eve in 2018? The chart below shows the S&P 500 Index performance during the fourth quarter of that year.

I joined RWM in June of 2018 and spent the first few months learning about our firm’s systems, processes, and investment strategies. By the time I began talking to potential new clients, it was late summer. It takes about a month or two from the time we have an initial conversation with a prospect to the time accounts are opened and funded. My first few new relationships were established right before the market sank 20% that fall.

We all remember the COVID crash of March 2020. The market fell 35% in six weeks. That was the most intense market decline I’ve ever experienced. One client joined in early February 2020, immediately before the world shut down.

There’s a flip side to inception date roulette, the client who gets lucky with their timing. Our phones were ringing off the hook during that Covid spring. I chose to cut my maternity leave short to help with the volume. As a result, a handful of clients started in April and May of 2020. In our first year working together, the S&P 500 was up 44%.

My point here is that our investment philosophy and strategy remained the same over these time periods. We didn’t become geniuses in April 2020, and we weren’t idiots in October 2018. These are simply moments in time when the market moved in one direction or another. When it comes to your inception date with an investment advisor, chance plays a huge role.

The same goes for investment strategies going in or out of favour. As I pointed out recently, Warren Buffett, the greatest investor of all time, has had multiple, prolonged periods of underperformance. His style was out of favour, but he stuck to it. And once again, he is reaping the rewards of his discipline. Berkshire Hathaway stock is up 18% year to date while the market is down 5%. So too does any investment style go in or out of favour. Ours is no exception.

I am forever grateful to my mentors for teaching me never to sell based on past investment performance. This might work for hedge fund managers, but it’s a recipe for disaster for wealth managers. I have always thrown cold water on excitement over recent outperformance because I know the next downturn is lurking around the bend.

Advisers who sell on performance, die by performance. Their client relationships will not endure the next downturn or the next time their strategy underperforms. Any financial adviser presenting you with a beautiful chart of past performance is a red flag. An advisory relationship should be based on so much more than investment performance alone. If you’ve taken the time to find the right adviser for you, by vetting their philosophy, process, and people, you will be prepared for whatever chance throws your way in the early part of that relationship.

 

Blair duQuesnay, CFA®, CFP® is an investment advisor at Ritholtz Wealth Management, LLC. For disclosure information please visit: https://ritholtzwealth.com/blog-disclosures/. Republished, with permission, from The Belle Curve.

 

  •   27 April 2022
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

The perfect portfolio for the next decade

Creating a bulletproof investment portfolio

The challenges of building a portfolio from scratch

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.