Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 455

Investment performance and start date randomness

I’ve been the primary adviser to clients for 12 years, and my career in wealth management is approaching two decades. Each client hired me on a different date over those 12 years, and since I joined RWM four years ago, this has been at a pace of about one new client every month. As a result, they all have different start dates for calculating investment performance under my watch. I call this 'inception date roulette'. There’s an element of randomness that determines what the first few months or years of the client’s experience will be in terms of performance since the inception date. I never know when the next downturn in the market will be, but I am certain that a new client will hire me right before it.

Remember in 2011, when the S&P rating agency downgraded the debt rating of the U.S. government? Congress had a standoff over the debt ceiling at the time. Stocks sank 16% over a two-week period. I had just moved from New York to New Orleans and founded a solo advisory business. Guess when my first new client signed on? July 2011. We began that relationship with double-digit declines in their portfolio.

Remember the 20% market decline leading up to Christmas Eve in 2018? The chart below shows the S&P 500 Index performance during the fourth quarter of that year.

I joined RWM in June of 2018 and spent the first few months learning about our firm’s systems, processes, and investment strategies. By the time I began talking to potential new clients, it was late summer. It takes about a month or two from the time we have an initial conversation with a prospect to the time accounts are opened and funded. My first few new relationships were established right before the market sank 20% that fall.

We all remember the COVID crash of March 2020. The market fell 35% in six weeks. That was the most intense market decline I’ve ever experienced. One client joined in early February 2020, immediately before the world shut down.

There’s a flip side to inception date roulette, the client who gets lucky with their timing. Our phones were ringing off the hook during that Covid spring. I chose to cut my maternity leave short to help with the volume. As a result, a handful of clients started in April and May of 2020. In our first year working together, the S&P 500 was up 44%.

My point here is that our investment philosophy and strategy remained the same over these time periods. We didn’t become geniuses in April 2020, and we weren’t idiots in October 2018. These are simply moments in time when the market moved in one direction or another. When it comes to your inception date with an investment advisor, chance plays a huge role.

The same goes for investment strategies going in or out of favour. As I pointed out recently, Warren Buffett, the greatest investor of all time, has had multiple, prolonged periods of underperformance. His style was out of favour, but he stuck to it. And once again, he is reaping the rewards of his discipline. Berkshire Hathaway stock is up 18% year to date while the market is down 5%. So too does any investment style go in or out of favour. Ours is no exception.

I am forever grateful to my mentors for teaching me never to sell based on past investment performance. This might work for hedge fund managers, but it’s a recipe for disaster for wealth managers. I have always thrown cold water on excitement over recent outperformance because I know the next downturn is lurking around the bend.

Advisers who sell on performance, die by performance. Their client relationships will not endure the next downturn or the next time their strategy underperforms. Any financial adviser presenting you with a beautiful chart of past performance is a red flag. An advisory relationship should be based on so much more than investment performance alone. If you’ve taken the time to find the right adviser for you, by vetting their philosophy, process, and people, you will be prepared for whatever chance throws your way in the early part of that relationship.

 

Blair duQuesnay, CFA®, CFP® is an investment advisor at Ritholtz Wealth Management, LLC. For disclosure information please visit: https://ritholtzwealth.com/blog-disclosures/. Republished, with permission, from The Belle Curve.

 

  •   27 April 2022
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

The perfect portfolio for the next decade

Creating a bulletproof investment portfolio

The challenges of building a portfolio from scratch

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.