Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 455

Investment performance and start date randomness

I’ve been the primary adviser to clients for 12 years, and my career in wealth management is approaching two decades. Each client hired me on a different date over those 12 years, and since I joined RWM four years ago, this has been at a pace of about one new client every month. As a result, they all have different start dates for calculating investment performance under my watch. I call this 'inception date roulette'. There’s an element of randomness that determines what the first few months or years of the client’s experience will be in terms of performance since the inception date. I never know when the next downturn in the market will be, but I am certain that a new client will hire me right before it.

Remember in 2011, when the S&P rating agency downgraded the debt rating of the U.S. government? Congress had a standoff over the debt ceiling at the time. Stocks sank 16% over a two-week period. I had just moved from New York to New Orleans and founded a solo advisory business. Guess when my first new client signed on? July 2011. We began that relationship with double-digit declines in their portfolio.

Remember the 20% market decline leading up to Christmas Eve in 2018? The chart below shows the S&P 500 Index performance during the fourth quarter of that year.

I joined RWM in June of 2018 and spent the first few months learning about our firm’s systems, processes, and investment strategies. By the time I began talking to potential new clients, it was late summer. It takes about a month or two from the time we have an initial conversation with a prospect to the time accounts are opened and funded. My first few new relationships were established right before the market sank 20% that fall.

We all remember the COVID crash of March 2020. The market fell 35% in six weeks. That was the most intense market decline I’ve ever experienced. One client joined in early February 2020, immediately before the world shut down.

There’s a flip side to inception date roulette, the client who gets lucky with their timing. Our phones were ringing off the hook during that Covid spring. I chose to cut my maternity leave short to help with the volume. As a result, a handful of clients started in April and May of 2020. In our first year working together, the S&P 500 was up 44%.

My point here is that our investment philosophy and strategy remained the same over these time periods. We didn’t become geniuses in April 2020, and we weren’t idiots in October 2018. These are simply moments in time when the market moved in one direction or another. When it comes to your inception date with an investment advisor, chance plays a huge role.

The same goes for investment strategies going in or out of favour. As I pointed out recently, Warren Buffett, the greatest investor of all time, has had multiple, prolonged periods of underperformance. His style was out of favour, but he stuck to it. And once again, he is reaping the rewards of his discipline. Berkshire Hathaway stock is up 18% year to date while the market is down 5%. So too does any investment style go in or out of favour. Ours is no exception.

I am forever grateful to my mentors for teaching me never to sell based on past investment performance. This might work for hedge fund managers, but it’s a recipe for disaster for wealth managers. I have always thrown cold water on excitement over recent outperformance because I know the next downturn is lurking around the bend.

Advisers who sell on performance, die by performance. Their client relationships will not endure the next downturn or the next time their strategy underperforms. Any financial adviser presenting you with a beautiful chart of past performance is a red flag. An advisory relationship should be based on so much more than investment performance alone. If you’ve taken the time to find the right adviser for you, by vetting their philosophy, process, and people, you will be prepared for whatever chance throws your way in the early part of that relationship.

 

Blair duQuesnay, CFA®, CFP® is an investment advisor at Ritholtz Wealth Management, LLC. For disclosure information please visit: https://ritholtzwealth.com/blog-disclosures/. Republished, with permission, from The Belle Curve.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

The perfect portfolio for the next decade

Creating a bulletproof investment portfolio

The challenges of building a portfolio from scratch

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.