Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 591

Is Medibank Private a bargain?

The Medibank and ahm private health insurance brands serve over 4.2 million customers and play a vital role in funding medical care in Australia. In the most recent financial year, Medibank paid out $6.3 billion in health insurance claims, taking a significant burden off the public healthcare system.

Yet recently, the sector has come under fire from both the government and hospitals accused of making too much profit. In this article, we explore this regulatory tension and why we think Medibank looks an attractive investment opportunity.

Private hospital profits affected by new models of care

There is no doubt the past few years have been challenging for hospitals – labour shortages have affected service levels and inflation has been rampant. Private hospital operators have responded by launching a campaign against the health insurers and pressuring the government for a bailout. While additional payments or a tax may provide short-term relief to hospitals, they do not solve the structural issues facing the sector and ultimately would drive up the cost of healthcare and premiums for millions of Australians. To build a sustainable private healthcare system, all participants must work together to find efficiencies and drive down the overall cost of care.

Medibank is doing its part to lower costs by investing in new models of care away from overnight stays in expensive acute care hospitals to virtual, short-stay hospitals and home care. Without this transition, Medibank estimates the government will need to spend 50% more on healthcare as a percentage of GDP in 40 years. While this transition does come at the expense of hospitals that typically earn more for longer in-hospital stays, it is beneficial for the wider healthcare system. Higher hospital costs would simply translate to higher premiums, which are likely to push more members out of private health insurance and place further strain on an already stretched public healthcare system.

It is for this reason the Federal Health Minister following a review has conceded, “There’s no silver bullet from Canberra or funding solution from taxpayers to deal with what are essentially private pressures in the system”. Ultimately, it is not the government’s job to prop up unprofitable business models and in some cases, it is healthy for some private hospitals to shut where there is overcapacity in the system.

Has Medibank profited at the expense of hospitals?

Medibank has stuck to its promise not to profit from the pandemic and returned a total of $1.46 billion in givebacks to customers for permanent claims savings due to COVID-19. This is evident in the chart below which shows Medibank’s health insurance gross profit margin is still below FY19 levels.

Figure 1 – Medibank Health Insurance Gross Margin

Source: Company filings

Fear of regulation creates opportunity to invest

While there remains uncertainty as to how the regulatory situation will unfold with a federal election coming up, we think it’s unlikely the government will step in and prop up private hospitals where there is a clear shift to lower-cost care outside the hospital. In the meantime, we believe this creates an opportunity to invest in Australia’s largest health insurer, which has grown its earnings per share at 8% p.a. over the past decade.

Medibank screens as a high-quality business under our investment process for the following reasons:

  1. Financial strength: Medibank has a strong capital position with a capital ratio of 14.1%, well above its 10-12% target range, and has zero debt on its balance sheet.
  2. Business quality: Medibank is Australia’s largest health insurer with 4.2 million members (27% market share). This scale enables Medibank to negotiate better terms with hospitals keeping a lid on claims inflation while sharing these savings with members to lower premiums and improve retention.
  3. Management quality: David Koczkar has been the CEO since 2021 and prior to this was the COO since 2014. Over this period, the company has seen a return to policyholder growth, expanded its health offering and tightly managed its costs.

Finally, from a valuation perspective, Medibank is trading on less than 17x P/E (below its long-term average of 19x) and offers investors an attractive dividend yield of 4.6%.

Figure 2 – Medibank NTM Rolling PE

Source: FactSet

 

Emma Fisher is a Portfolio Manager and Deputy Head of Australian Equities, and Vinay Ranjan is Deputy Portfolio Manager at Magellan-owned, Airlie Funds Management. Magellan Asset Management is a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article has been prepared for general information purposes only and must not be construed as investment advice or as an investment recommendation. This material does not consider your investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs.

For more articles and papers from Magellan, please click here.

 

  •   18 December 2024
  • 7
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Picking the next sector winner

Is ResMed a trap or an opportunity?

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.