Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 146

Multi-manager diversification or tax efficiency or both?

The taxation structure of superannuation funds in Australia is curious by world standards. Most countries follow the ‘EET’ taxation structure (Exempt contributions, Exempt investments, Taxable benefits). Australia, unusually, follows the ‘TTE’ structure (Taxable contributions, Taxable investments, Exempt benefits), though the ‘T’ is levied at concessional rates. It will be fascinating to see what will change as the Government moves through its tax reform agenda this year.

Taxation in the accumulation and pension phase

Management of the ‘middle T’ taxation of the investment earnings of superannuation funds is therefore a particularly Australian challenge, and appears alien to our US and UK counterparts. Finding reliable research, expertise and solutions in the area of managing institutional superannuation portfolios after tax is quite challenging, yet the task is an important one. This is true not only for superannuation members in the taxable accumulation (pre-retirement) phase but also for pension phase members who care about that other Australian tax peculiarity, franking credits, along with foreign withholding taxes.

An early challenge large funds face as they move to an after-tax investing focus for their equity portfolios is how this fits within a multi-manager framework. Funds typically spread their portfolios across a range of managers to access different styles and achieve an optimal blend of diversity – an application of the more familiar theme of diversifying across asset classes to reduce risks and increase returns to further improve the overall risk/return profile of the fund’s equity portfolio. This results in the equity portfolio of a large superannuation fund having an architecture that looks something like the diagram below.

Multi-manager structure tax inefficiencies

Naturally, each manager is unaware of the other managers’ portfolio holdings, trading and investment insights. This protects each manager’s intellectual property and the diversity of the structure as a whole. But here’s the rub: it is a very inefficient, possibly damaging way to manage the fund’s overall capital gains tax (CGT) liabilities from equity trading. Each manager can, at best, manage the CGT on their own portfolio, but still have no knowledge of the tax positions of other managers or of the portfolio as a whole. This can generate dysfunctional decision-making.

For example, Table 1 below illustrates three types of potentially sub-optimal behaviour by equity managers:

  • trading which looks value-accretive but in fact reduces value post-tax
  • not trading, hence forgoing active returns, because of an illusory tax hurdle
  • delaying the timing of a trade, hence increasing tracking error risk, because of an illusory CGT discount benefit.

Effective CGT management requires centralisation or line-of-sight across the whole portfolio. Superannuation funds may think they are doing the right thing for their members by asking their equity managers to concentrate on after-tax returns, but actually it makes little sense to hold those managers accountable for the fund’s overall CGT liability.

The use of Centralised Portfolio Management

There is a solution, well-established in the US and gaining traction in Australia, which can help superannuation funds with multi-manager equity portfolios solve this problem. ‘Tax-managed Centralised Portfolio Management’ (CPM) combines each manager’s investment insights with a central implementation manager with the job of ensuring

trades are tax-optimised at the whole-of-portfolio level as shown in the diagram below.

In this solution, a large superannuation fund can continue to appoint managers based on the fund’s own objectives, style preferences, and risk and fee budgets. This preserves the multi-manager blending and diversification benefits the fund is seeking. But instead of each manager routing trades separately through their own set of brokers, the execution of these collective manager insights is centralised. Daily, the managers’ recommended trade lists are received and offsetting ‘redundant’ trades identified and eliminated by a single implementation manager (e.g. where Manager A buys BHP shares as Manager B sells BHP shares). The implementation manager, viewing the entire portfolio, can then address tax inefficiencies; for example, by identifying the same stock in a different manager’s portfolio with lower embedded CGT; or by choosing to hold off on a proposed trade so that it qualifies for the CGT discount. There are also numerous other (non-tax) benefits of centralising implementation in this way.

CPM as a dedicated, sophisticated after-tax focused investment solution shows how funds need not be forced to choose between multi-manager diversification and tax efficiency – both important objectives. With a little innovation, a fund really can have both.


Raewyn Williams is Director of Research & After-Tax Solutions at Parametric, a US-based investment advisor. Parametric is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian Financial Services Licence under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the “Act”) in respect of the provision of financial services to wholesale clients as defined in the Act and is regulated by the SEC under US laws, which may differ from Australian laws. This information is not intended for retail clients, as defined in the Act. Parametric is not a licensed tax agent or advisor in Australia and this does not represent tax advice. Additional information is available at


August 06, 2018

My understanding is that a CPM manager uses tracking error budget to discretionary choose which of the stock picking managers trades he will do. In exercising that discretion he is targeting a better after tax outcome. But it is possible that the after tax outcome leaves the pretax/tax naive outcome worse. So does the stock picking manager get judged on the performance of his "model" portfolio or the dicretionarily adjusted/real portfolio? Cant you get a widening drift in the real and model portfolios?

March 14, 2016

What happens when the implementation manager holds off trading the stock (despite the fund manager's instruction) and the share price falls, thereby having a negative impact on performance?

Raewyn Williams
March 14, 2016

Stella - thanks for your feedback. As the author, I have a strict word limit for the article so not feasible to explain the table painstakingly, though there is more explanation in our full published research paper "What Should Managers Manage?". Two quick comments: 1)the Ys and Ns are just different scenarios and aren't meant to balance out. The 2 different coloured sets of columns show the distinction between what the manager sees and what a whole-of-portfolio view shows. The rows are just different trade scenarios; 2) as to how many managers, no strict minimum or maximum, but the more managers you have, generally, the greater the problem is.

Fundie - thanks for your feedback also. We published research ("The Road to Reward") last year suggesting propagation could provide 5-10% of the benefits of tax-managed CPM, though there are variations. Note also that you get innate propagation (plus more) in a CPM structure.

March 11, 2016

Custodians provide a service that can go at least part of the way (propagation) to solving this problem.

Stella Young
March 11, 2016

I get the article, but Table 1 doesn't illustrate the points well. Could you please add some descriptive material to Table 1 to make it easier to understand?

Things that would help are answers to the following questions. How many portfolio managers are we looking at? Just 1? 3? 6? Where do the Ys and Ns come from? Who decides them? What is actually making the whole portfolio view different from the manager's view here? How do the rows of the table work together for the whole portfolio thinking?

The last column suggests, perhaps mistakenly, that all the pluses and minuses balance out in the table, so over all there shouldn't be problem - which is not the point the article wants to make.

Thank you.

Oh, by the way, I am a wholesale client and I love reading Cuffelinks on a regular basis.


Leave a Comment:



Portfolio diversification: when a free lunch can cause indigestion

Why 2020 has been the year of the bond market

Is gold a growth or defensive asset?


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 little-known pension traps prove the value of advice

Most people entering retirement do not see a financial adviser, mainly due to cost. It's a major problem because there are small mistakes a retiree can make which are expensive and avoidable if a few tips were known.

Check eligibility for the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card

Eligibility for the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card has no asset test and a relatively high income test. It's worth checking eligibility and the benefits of qualifying to save on the cost of medications.

Hamish Douglass on why the movie hasn’t ended yet

The focus is on Magellan for its investment performance and departure of the CEO, but Douglass says the pandemic, inflation, rising rates and Middle East tensions have not played out. Vindication is always long term.

Start the year right with the 2022 Retiree Checklist

This is our annual checklist of what retirees need to be aware of in 2022. It is a long list of 25 items and not everything will apply to your situation. Run your eye over the benefits and entitlements.

At 98-years-old, Charlie Munger still delivers the one-liners

The Warren Buffett/Charlie Munger partnership is the stuff of legends, but even Charlie admits it is coming to an end ("I'm nearly dead"). He is one of the few people in investing prepared to say what he thinks.

Should I pay off the mortgage or top up my superannuation?

Depending on personal circumstances, it may be time to rethink the bias to paying down housing debt over wealth accumulation in super. Do the sums and ask these four questions to plan for your future.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Three ways index investing masks extra risk

There are thousands of different indexes, and they are not all diversified and broadly-based. Watch for concentration risk in sectors and companies, and know the underlying assets in case liquidity is needed.

Investment strategies

Will 2022 be the year for quality companies?

It is easy to feel like an investing genius over the last 10 years, with most asset classes making wonderful gains. But if there's a setback, companies like Reece, ARB, Cochlear, REA Group and CSL will recover best.


2022 outlook: buy a raincoat but don't put it on yet

In the 11th year of a bull market, near the end of the cycle, some type of correction is likely. Underneath is solid, healthy and underpinned by strong earnings growth, but there's less room for mistakes. 


Time to give up on gold?

In 2021, the gold price failed to sustain its strong rise since 2018, although it recovered after early losses. But where does gold sit in a world of inlfation, rising rates and a competitor like Bitcoin?

Investment strategies

Global leaders reveal surprises of 2021, challenges for 2022

In a sentence or two, global experts across many fields are asked to summarise the biggest surprise of 2021, and enduring challenges into 2022. It's a short and sweet view of the changes we are all facing.


2021 was a standout year for stockmarket listings

In 2021, sharemarket gains supported record levels of capital raisings and IPOs in Australia. The range of deals listed here shows the maturity of the local market in providing equity capital.  


Let 'er rip: how high can debt-to-GDP ratios soar?

Governments and investors have been complacent, even encouraged, the build up of debt, but somewhere, a ceiling exists. Are we near yet? Trouble is brewing, especially in the eurozone and emerging countries.



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.