Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 146

Reporting season was not all doom and gloom

February’s ‘reporting season’ took place whilst global equity markets were in free fall. As at the end of February 2016, the Australian All Ordinaries Accumulation Index had posted a negative return year-to-date of -6.78%. We are not alone in our pain however, with similar sentiment across many other international (developed) equity markets. The two major US indices, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 kick-started the year with the worst opening week performance in history, and the story was much the same across most European exchanges.

Whilst volatility in equity markets was driven by continued oil price weakness and fears surrounding the extent of China’s ‘hard landing’, according to those responsible for setting Australia’s monetary policy, the picture doesn’t look that bad. Economic growth continues to track within an acceptable range and there are no unanticipated signs of structural decline in any areas of the economy. In this seemingly contradictory environment, it is worth delving into the challenges and tailwinds facing businesses as reported by them during February’s reporting season.

What do we like to see?

The stock market is likely to reward companies that could:

  • grow revenue in a sustainable manner and
  • increase earnings through a combination of revenue and margin growth, rather than only cost-cutting.

Indeed, in an environment where earnings remain elusive and growth even more scarce (as evidenced by the high multiples paid for stocks that provide even a hint of this, such as Blackmores, Bellamy’s, Burson, IPH Limited), many analysts feared the worst in the reporting window. What resulted, however, surprised many, with Goldman Sachs stating, ‘Relative to expectations, this earnings season is on track to be one of the stronger post GFC period.’

According to Goldman Sachs’ research, at the close of the second week of reporting season (22 February), of the 54% of all companies that reported (the remaining falling into the final week of the month), 46% of these beat expectations by greater than 2%. Whilst this may not seem such a stunning result, the same research claimed that only twice in the past 15 earnings seasons have more than 40% of firms beaten expectations.

Those that performed the best, in line with the broader economic picture, operated in the consumer discretionary sector and relied on growth in domestic demand to increase revenue and earnings. While the consensus trade in February was from growth/momentum stocks to those in the resources sector (which also didn’t disappoint but mainly as a result of cost-cutting initiatives being delivered on time), it was momentum stocks that also produced some of the strongest ‘consensus beating’ results as at the time the research was undertaken.

In terms of underperformers, importers were hit especially hard by falls in the Australian dollar, particularly those whose currency hedging positions rolled off. The key challenge for these businesses is how best to pass on price increases to highly sensitive consumers without damaging demand - a fine balance to find.

Where is growth in earnings per share coming from?

In terms of overarching trends, perhaps one of the most interesting has been Earnings Per Share (EPS) overtaking Dividend Per Share (DPS) in certain sectors such as Industrials and Banks. EPS, simply speaking, is the proportion of a company’s profits allocated to issued capital (common shares). Growth in EPS is positively viewed by investors as it shows how much money the company is making for its shareholders, not only due to changes in profit, but also after all the effects of issuance of new shares.

As the picture for earnings remains elusive, where is the growth in EPS coming from? Previously, we had seen the delivery of cost-cutting initiatives and low interest cover charges to boost profit margins. Looking at the EBITDA operating margins, we can see that profit margins have now stopped increasing suggesting that benefits from these inputs have diminished and any future growth in earnings will need to come solely through revenue growth, particularly for those companies in the Industrials sector. The chart below shows the operating margins of the ASX-100 Industrials since 2010.

Source: Bloomberg

Volatility is disguising economic health

Tying together company performance and key indicators of Australia’s economic health, we conclude that the picture is not as bleak as the recent volatility in equity markets suggests. Looking at the underlying reasons for the recent market fall (before the March 2016 rally):

  • Oil price weakness: Positive for net importers of this commodity as it represents, as per Howard Marks of Oaktree, a “multi-hundred-billion-dollar tax cut, adding to consumers’ disposable income. It can also increase an importer nation’s cost competiveness”, and
  • Growth headwinds in China: Whilst growth levels have fallen, they still remain attractive relative to other global economies. Further, areas within China are experiencing strong growth, such as consumer spending, particularly in retail sales and travel. Retail sales in China are up almost 11.5% versus this time last year and the latest statistics relating to inbound tourism from China to Australia show growth of almost 11% from this time last year. Further, in relation to China’s impact on US growth, according to US national income accounts, only 0.7% of US profits are generated in China. Goldman Sachs’ research estimates that a 1% drop in China’s GDP growth will have a 0.1% impact on US GDP from direct and indirect exposure. If you compare that to the GFC, the banking system in the US had a 39% exposure to US mortgages, hence why the shock was so great. Yes, there is always a risk of financial contagion from China to other countries, but we think this risk is being overplayed.

What is the key criteria for successful investing through this period of equity market volatility?

As a value-driven investor, we look for companies that have the ability to leverage the ‘quality’ aspects of their business, such as strong brands, people, balance sheets and the ability to move quickly and efficiently to implement changes to position them as leaders. Whilst profitability is, of course, important to assess, it presents the market with a value to ascribe to a company’s stock ‘at a given point in time’. As such, inefficiencies can be created and therefore opportunity can present for those with a longer-term horizon.


Sebastian Evans is Chief Investment Officer and Managing Director of NAOS Asset Management. This information is general only and does not take into consideration the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any reader. Readers should consider consulting a financial adviser before making any investment decision.



Dividends, disruption and star performers in FY21 wrap

How to handle the riskiest company results in history

3 principles for finding dividend sustainability


Most viewed in recent weeks

Lessons when a fund manager of the year is down 25%

Every successful fund manager suffers periods of underperformance, and investors who jump from fund to fund chasing results are likely to do badly. Selecting a manager is a long-term decision but what else?

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

In almost 1,000 responses, our readers differ in voting intentions versus polling of the general population, but they have little doubt who will win and there is widespread disappointment with our politics.

Now you can earn 5% on bonds but stay with quality

Conservative investors who want the greater capital security of bonds can now lock in 5% but they should stay at the higher end of credit quality. Rises in rates and defaults mean it's not as easy as it looks.

30 ETFs in one ecosystem but is there a favourite?

In the last decade, ETFs have become a mainstay of many portfolios, with broad market access to most asset types, as well as a wide array of sectors and themes. Is there a favourite of a CEO who oversees 30 funds?

Australia’s bounty: is it just diversified luck?

Increases in commodity prices have fuelled global inflation while benefiting commodities exporters like Australia. Oftentimes, booms lead to busts and investors need to get the timing right on pricing cycles to be successful.

Meg on SMSFs – More on future-proofing your fund

Single-member SMSFs face challenges where the eventual beneficiaries (or support team in the event of incapacity) will be the member’s adult children. Even worse, what happens if one or more of the children live overseas?

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Five features of a fair performance fee, including a holiday

Most investors pay little attention to the performance fee on their fund but it can have a material impact on returns, especially if the structure is unfair. Check for these features and a coming fee holiday.


Ned Bell on why there’s a generational step change underway

During market dislocation events, investors react irrationally and it should be a great environment for active management. The last few years have been an easy ride on tech stocks but it's now all about quality.  

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Powers of attorney for your fund

Granting an enduring power of attorney is an important decision for the trustees of an SMSF. There are alternatives and protections to consider including who should perform this vital role and when.


The great divergence: the evolution of the 'magnetic' workplace

The pandemic profoundly impacted the way we use real estate but in a post-pandemic environment, tenant preferences and behaviours are now providing more certainty to the outlook of our major real estate sectors.


Bank reporting season scorecard May 2022

A key feature of the May results for the banking sector was profits trending back to pre-Covid-19 levels, thanks to lower than expected unemployment and the growth in house prices.

Why gender diversity matters for investors

Companies with a boys’ club approach to leadership are a red flag for investors. On the other hand, companies that walk the talk on women in leadership roles perform better, potentially making them better investments. 


Is it all falling apart for central banks?

Central banks are unable to ignore the inflation in front of them, but underlying macro-economic conditions indicate that inflation may be transitory and the consequences of monetary tightening dangerous.



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.