Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 320

Risk and reward in three high-income investments

Investors are currently faced with challenges when it comes to portfolio construction. The macro uncertainty caused by slowing economic growth in the US and China has created a higher level of disruption, noise, and equity market volatility. Investors seeking stable growth and income in their portfolios are rethinking their asset allocations.

The search for high income

Fixed-income assets have become an area of increased focus given their attractive level of income and lower sensitivity to interest rate risk. In the following sections, we discuss three different types of fixed income and highlight the key risks and benefits:

  1. High yield bonds
  2. Leveraged loans
  3. Private debts

Fixed income spectrum overview

1. High yield bonds: an evolving market

High yield bonds are corporate bonds rated below BBB- or BBa3 by credit agencies, such as Moody’s and Fitch. They offer higher yields than investment grade corporate bonds based on the risk profile of the company.

Investors often label high yield bonds as ‘junk bonds’. This may have been an apt description in the 1980s when small and speculative companies dominated the sector, but the market has matured dramatically since.

The high yield market has evolved into an international financing mechanism widely used by fundamentally sound companies looking to diversify their funding mix away from bank debt or shareholder equity. The market has grown significantly to approximately US$2.8 trillion with more than 2,000 issuers across the globe, including Netflix, Hertz, Fiat, and Mattel, and large players in the telecom and internet sectors.

Over the long term, high yield bonds have provided attractive total returns, outpacing equities after adjusting for volatility. Due to income and a high position in the capital structure, high yield bonds have generally outperformed equities during economic downturns while retaining some potential upside during economic recoveries.

The chart below highlights the performance of high yield bonds and US equities for the past 20 years (performance in USD, June 1999 - June 2019).


(The Sharpe Ratio is a measure of the return of an investment compared with its risk).

Default is the largest risk to high yield bonds. A variety of factors, including uncertainty around trade wars, might bring disruptions to the global economy. However, we believe fundamentals supporting the global high yield market continue to be constructive. Corporate revenue and cash flow are growing modestly while leverage is declining. Operating performance of underlying issuers has been stable, revenue and EBITDA growth remain in the positive, and refinancing activity has significantly reduced the number of bonds maturing in the near term.

2. Leveraged loans: senior floating rate debt

Leveraged loans, also known as senior floating rate loans or bank loans, are made by banks to non-investment grade companies to finance various corporate activities, including mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, recapitalisations, and capital expenditures.

Leveraged loans are floating rate, which means that the coupons readjust every quarter to a spread over a base rate (typically LIBOR). If interest rates rise or fall, the coupon on these loans also rises or falls along with market conditions.

In addition, leveraged loans are generally secured, implying they are in the senior-most position in the capital structure. Therefore, holders of these loans typically have a first priority lien on the assets of the borrower and must be repaid before any other obligation, including bondholders or stockholders, in the event of a default.

In general, leveraged loans have protective covenants built into the contract for the safety of lenders, such as financial maintenance tests which measure the debt-servicing ability of the issuers.

Leveraged loans and high yield bonds share some similar characteristics in that both are issued by non-investment grade corporations and are subject to credit risk as well as changes in market sentiment. In fact, many non-investment grade companies will often have both leveraged loans and high yield bonds outstanding.

New risk rises amid growing loan issuance

While roughly half the size of the current high yield bond market, the leveraged loans market has grown significantly in recent years. With the rapid issuance, we are seeing new risks in the lower-rated segment of the loans market. Investors should fully consider the following:

• Increase in lower-rated issuance. Default rates grow exponentially at progressively lower ratings. Moody's notes that a record 43% of first-time issuers in the first half of 2018 were rated B3, which typically is the lowest rating acceptable to investors.

• Smaller or nonexistent debt cushions. Since the financial crisis, the share of debt cushion on outstanding covenant-lite leveraged loans has fallen from 35% to ~22%. Moreover, loans today are more likely to be structured as first-lien-only transactions (58% in 2018 versus 39% in 2012). These loans are the only form of debt financing in the issuer’s capital structure.

• Percentage of outstanding loans without a debt cushion

Source: S&P Capital IQ LCD. Data is as of June 30, 2019. Based on pro forma financials at the closing of each loan; debt cushion represents the share of debt that is subordinated to first-lien term loans.

• Weaker loan documentation. The typical loan credit agreement has become less restrictive for issuers, presenting a greater risk to lenders. In general, credit agreements have become more aggressive, allowing the issuer such leeway as asset transfers, greater incremental secured-debt incurrence, and an increase in the retention of asset-sale proceeds. Such weakening covenant protections have the potential to dilute the position of first-lien loans at the top of the capital structure. As such, we are seeing the emergence of covenant-lite loans which typically require fewer financial maintenance tests. Companies provide greater flexibility and freedom to manage cash flows but offer less protection for investors.

Loan covenant quality index hovers near lows

Source: Moody’s, as of September 30, 2018. Scores range from 1 to 5, with a higher score denoting weaker covenant quality

3. Private debt: selection is key

Disintermediation of the financial sector is encouraging companies that would normally have borrowed from banks to seek debt funding directly from investors.

Generally speaking, public debt securities are those that are registered with regulators. ‘Traditional’ fixed income asset classes such as investment-grade credit, agency mortgages, high yield bonds, and emerging markets debt all fall under the public umbrella. In contrast, private debt is either unregistered or registered under specific exemptions.

However, the key practical difference historically has been their liquidity profiles. Although private debts generate higher returns, they are considered illiquid investments due to long investor horizons and restricted access to investors. Investing in private debt securities require special expertise and robust research platforms, as the market is highly complex with high entry barriers.

Additionally, investors should be aware that there are limited details and a lack of transparency of these private investments due to their product structure and the nature of the agreement. As such, many of them are not rated by rating agencies. Furthermore, investors need to mindful about the valuation methodology to fully understand the risk involved.

Private debt is not homogenous. It now finances a range of investments, such as corporate, consumer non-residential, small-business, residential mortgage, and other more-niche categories of lending, which present investors with a differentiated opportunity set. The risks associated with each type of strategy can be very different. In fact, the majority of private debt funds were created after the financial crisis and many strategies are untested against adverse market conditions. To navigate this market, investors should be aware of the risks involved and extremely selective their choice of investments.

Conclusion

Historically, fixed income assets provided income and diversification benefits for investors. In the current low interest rate environment, high yield bonds, investor focus on leveraged loans and private debts is rising as the asset class offers unique opportunities to investors. However, investors must fully understand the risk and return profile of these fixed-income investments.

 

Vivek Bommi is a Senior Portfolio Manager at Neuberger Berman, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This material is provided for information purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. It does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

For more articles and papers by Neuberger Berman, please click here.

 

  •   20 August 2019
  • 1
  •      
  •   
1 Comments
Simon
August 21, 2019

Interesting choice of starting date for S&P 500 performance comparison

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

High yield downturn will be long and ugly

Don't compare apples and oranges in private credit

It's not high return/risk equities versus low return/risk bonds

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.