Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 425

Seven factors driving growth in Managed Accounts

It's hardly 'late breaking news' to say there’s a lot of change going on in financial advice. Much of it is driven by regulation but the deeper impacts are due to structural change impacting many other sectors of financial services.

Managed Accounts are an important and growing part of the advice profession and IMAP’s survey of the managed account market shows a total Funds Under Management (FUM) as at 30 June 2021 of $111 billion, exceeding $100 billion for the first time.

Managed Accounts servicing more advisers

Managed Accounts are delivered through two main structures – Separately Managed Accounts or SMAs, essentially a single platform managed investment scheme, and Managed Discretionary Accounts or MDAs, an agreement-based service. The former is generally a product-based approach to the delivery of advice, the latter a service-based approach.

Either type of Managed Account is created by or on behalf of the advice profession as a way of delivering more or less customised portfolios in an efficient way. How customised is a function of the technology in use and the client circumstances.

Source: IMAP

IMAP has been collecting data on managed accounts of all types since 2017 and at $111 billion they are almost exactly the same size as the ETF market. This CAGR of 21% over the past three years, if maintained, will see Managed Accounts exceed $200 billion in 2024. Simple trend extrapolation is often a trap, but in an advised market that comfortably exceeds $1 trillion in assets, this seems credible.

We identify seven factors as driving this growth:

1. Professionalisation

Regulation, higher educational standards, the generational change of traditional advisers being replaced by younger, better educated women and men, many more independent investment consultants ... all these have led to the professionalisation of advice and portfolios built to meet client objectives with a higher probability of success.

Advice firms are adding resources to manage or ‘commission’ portfolios delivered through Managed Accounts which reflect particular approaches to investment markets. The investment consultants and research houses have been happy to meet this need and have brought far more rigour to the creation and management of portfolios than the old Approved Product List-based approach. This has allowed advisers to focus on the areas of expertise where they can personally add value for clients.

But professionalism isn’t simply about education standards and compliance. It’s also about operating advice businesses in an efficient manner with appropriate standards of governance, effective operating structure, sustainable revenue and cost models. Managed Accounts enable advisers to meet a continuing level of demand for advice at a time when the number of advisers is declining.

2. Wider investment choice

One of the key features of the investment landscape has been the expansion of investment options such as retail access to international shares, alternative funds or ETFs and other ETPs on the ASX and Chi-X.

The growth in the number and value of ETFs/ETPs, with the transactional advantages, transparency, superior reporting and often lower cost these products are able to offer compared to unlisted managed funds has seen them rapidly adopted into Managed Accounts.

IMAP estimates that Managed Accounts constitute 14% of FUM invested in ETFs in June 2021.

3. Technology

As in so many other areas, technology has transformed the capability of providers to easily create highly customised services. The platforms have been in a technology race to enable licensee-based portfolio management and lower cost technology is enabling the management of directly held assets in a way which simply wasn’t contemplated previously. Apart from the portfolio management capabilities, we’re seeing offshore listed assets directly held by retail clients and traded economically.

As an example of the impact of technology, Nucleus Wealth, the 2021 IMAP Innovation Award winner, offers highly-nuanced individualisation of ESG preferences through Managed Accounts in a way not available in pooled vehicles.

Cloud-based services and blockchain will only accelerate this drive.

4. Regulation

Traditional advice through Statement of Advice (SoAs) and Records of Advice (RoAs) is a cottage industry, inadequately systematised, delivered on a one-by-one basis to clients. It’s a recipe for compliance nightmares and breaches. The recent Westpac advice business corporate action remediation is costing around $100 million and grew out of apparently mishandling less than one corporate action on average per client per year for 14 years.

Managed Accounts enable a licensee to introduce a systematic approach to the management of portfolios, and ensure the clear allocation of responsibilities between advisers, platforms, providers and portfolio managers.

Best interest obligations are a frequently discussed topic in regard to Managed Accounts. Does ‘best interest’ have to mean cheaper? Actually, the correct question is “When is a process that is more structured than traditional advice, has clear objectives, is systematically managed, is more equitable, reduces implementation leakage and enables better reporting not in a client’s best interest?” This message is starting to become apparent to clearer-thinking advice firms.

5. Competitive pressure

Platforms, investment managers, research houses and advice licensees have all felt the pressure in the past few years from their respective client bases to create and support Managed Account offerings. It’s a dynamic market at work and the pressure to innovate isn’t likely to let up in the near future. It’s part of a virtuous circle of innovation where demand calls forth supply and supply creates demand.

6. ‘Retailisation’ of institutional capability

Driven by the factors we’ve set out above, the lines are blurring between retail, wholesale and institutional clients and capabilities. Examples include:

  • A Managed Account presents the chance for a portfolio manager to offer investment managers mandates of tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars
  • Use of assets listed on offshore exchanges and pooled structures such as UCITS in retail portfolios
  • Consultants offer sophisticated capabilities such as dynamic risk management designed specifically to manage sequencing risk for retail clients
  • Management of currency hedging for individual retail clients
  • Institutional asset consultants are also active.

Capabilities which previously were available only to institutional investors or though pooled vehicles such as unit trusts are now increasingly deployed for individual accounts.

7. Price compression

All of these factors are leading to lower costs for retail clients. Advice licensees see a value add for their clients in their ability to use lower cost investment options such as ETFs and direct holdings and in putting pressure on the costs of other participants in the value chain through rebates and specific unit classes.

The price pressures on platforms have occurred for broader reasons, but Managed Accounts have contributed. As advisers feel their own margins are under pressure, expect this focus on driving down costs to continue. And as the costs associated with Managed Accounts fall relative to more expensive service delivery of individual advice through RoAs, expect this economic reality to compound.

The factors we have listed above aren’t temporary and are likely to intensify. Their prediction of a $200 billion market before 2025 doesn’t seem far-fetched.


Toby Potter is Chair of IMAP (Institute of Managed Account Professionals) and a Director of Philo Capital Advisers, an MDA Provider. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.


Tried and tested
September 19, 2021

Absolutely spot on...I can't see any benefit to the client in using a SMA, MDA . I did some rough,back of envelope, numbers and couldn't find any difference. No client of mine has ever asked for these ...I think it fails the ' pub test', fasea 3, and best interest duty... Also feel more exposed if the proverbial hits the fan .. sticking with funds

Toby Potter
September 19, 2021

Many managed accounts are comprised of managed funds - in fact the IMAP census shows that managed funds and ETFs are over 50% of the assets held in $111bn of managed accounts. Typically when funds are in a managed account the portfolio manager negotiates a reduction in the fund ICR which is passed on to the clients, the major benefit for the clients is that what they think their adviser is doing " managing their portfolio" actually happens. How many advisers work through their entire client base because they want to increase exposure to an asset class by 5% or reduce exposure to a manger by 25% or increase a holding in a stock but only if the price is less than a certain price. A twice a year meeting and good luck betweentimes isn't gong to be a sustainable advice model.
Most advisers who adopt a managed account of whatever type find their clients say "I thought this was what you were doing anyway"

September 17, 2021

Well the cynic in me would say that most of the advantage here goes to the financial advice community - a way for them to charge a % and to gain efficiency/scale in delivering what was otherwise being delivered by institutions. And they are being enabled by disruptors in the funds/platform space. The espoused tailored mandates are highly arguable, with most I've seen looking very similar at asset allocation and even underlying manager levels, and at worst intensify active management risk by managing direct equities with arguably less experienced investment teams than more traditional fund managers. One aspect also espoused is greater tax efficiency, but I haven't seen any academic or independent research to support that thesis either, perhaps because they haven't been around long enough. I'm still also interested in how Standard 3 will apply, because if it does in the literal sense, many of these SMA's will have to be wound down.

Toby Potter
September 17, 2021

Hi Jack,
While some managed accounts are effectively also platforms (Praemium, Mason Stevens, Xplore Wealth) many are run on traditional platforms (Philo Capital). The platforms are essentially administrative vehicles.
The key point about managed accounts is the discretion to make investment decisions on behalf of each investor based on the mandate / investment program.
Your comment about each investor being treated individually is correct, compared to pooled unit trusts.

September 17, 2021

Thanks for the article but I'm struggling a little to get to the exact advantage of these managed accounts versus the old fashioned platforms. At its core, is it that in the old way, funds are pooled and the actions of one investor affects others, whereas the new way treats each investor individually?


Leave a Comment:


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.