Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 567

The ATO has SMSF asset valuations in its crosshairs

The ATO recently wrote to the trustees of approximately 16,500 self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) which have reported unlisted assets at the same value for at least the last three financial years.

Unlisted assets identified as a concern by the ATO include residential and commercial property, unlisted companies and unlisted unit trusts. The ATO also wrote to approximately 1,000 auditors who have performed audits on the 16,500 SMSFs where no audit contraventions were reported in respect of the market valuation rules.

In this article we will review the asset valuations requirements for SMSFs.

Legislative requirements

Superannuation law requires all assets to be valued at market value for the 2012/13 year of income, and all subsequent years [1].

Market value is defined as the amount that a willing buyer of the asset could reasonably be expected to pay to acquire the asset from a willing seller if the following assumptions were made:[2]

  1. that the buyer and the seller dealt with each other at arm’s length in relation to the sale;
  2. that the sale occurred after proper marketing of the asset;
  3. that the buyer and the seller acted knowledgeably and prudentially in relation to the sale.

ATO guidance

The trustee needs to have a reasonable basis for determining the market value of an asset. The ATO has published valuation guidelines for SMSFs which provides guidelines that are relevant for all funds when interpreting the market valuation definitions.

The ATO’s valuation checklist provides that valuations based on objective and supportable data should be used when:

  • preparing SMSF financial accounts and statements
  • testing whether the market value of an SMSF's in-house assets exceeds 5% of the fund’s total assets
  • determining the value of assets that support a pension
  • acquiring an asset from a related party
  • disposing of an asset to a related party

A valuation conducted by a qualified independent valuer is required when collectables and personal use assets are transferred or sold to a related party.

The proposed Division 296 tax may also have focused the Government’s attention on valuations since the value of a member’s total super balance is the basis for how the proposed tax will be calculated.

Valuation principles require the trustee to be able to demonstrate that the valuation has been determined on a 'fair and reasonable' basis. A valuation is generally considered fair and reasonable where:

  • it considers all relevant factors likely to affect the value of the asset
  • it has been undertaken in good faith
  • it uses a rational and reasoned process
  • it can be explained to a third party

The acceptability of a valuation is more likely to depend upon the process of obtaining the valuation rather than the person who conducted the valuation. The valuation must be based on objective and supportable data.

Depending on the situation, a valuation may be undertaken by a:

  • registered valuer
  • professional valuation service provider
  • member of a recognised professional valuation body
  • person without formal valuation qualifications but who has specific experience or knowledge in a particular area.

The ATO valuation guidelines specifically state that trustees are not automatically required to arrange an external valuation for all assets each year. For example, assets such as real property may not need an annual valuation unless a significant event occurred that may change its market value since it was last valued. Unfortunately, in Australia recently, property prices have been erratic. In many instances, it would be difficult to be confident that the value of a property hadn’t changed in the last three years.

In practice

I frequently hear trustees and advisers say that property assets only need to be valued every three years. This is simply not true, never has been and most certainly has not been for the last 12 years.

Trustees should consider the use of a qualified independent valuer if an asset represents a significant proportion of the fund's value or if the nature of the asset makes it likely that the valuation will be complex.

SMSF trustees need to demonstrate that a valuation has been determined using a fair and reasonable process that is based on objective and supportable data. This may involve research including market appraisals, council valuations and searches of similar property values. Trustees should retain all of the information used to determine the market value and present this to the SMSF auditor. Following a robust process can allow trustees to save the fund considerable expense whilst still meeting the legal requirements for valuing fund assets.

It is important to appreciate that auditors are not licenced valuers. The auditor’s role is to examine the evidence that the trustee has provided to support the valuation and determine if that evidence is fair and reasonable, based on the objective and supportable data provided.

Penalties

The requirement to value assets at least annually is an operating standard which means it is a requirement that auditors review the evidence supporting the valuation.

If a trustee’s valuation fails to meet the valuation requirements, the trustee is likely to be liable for administrative penalties. Serious failures could result in the SMSF losing its complying status.

Summary

SMSF trustees need to ensure that they value their assets at least annually and that their valuations are fair and reasonable and based on objective and supportable data. It is not adequate that trustees only apply the required level of effort to valuations if they expect the valuation to impact an important threshold such as a pension commencement, related party transactions or total super balances to determine eligibility to make certain contributions.

 

[1] Superannuation Industry Supervision Regulations 1994 regulation 8.02B
[2] Superannuation Industry Supervision Act 1993 section 10(1)

 

Julie Steed is a Senior Technical Services Manager at MLC TechConnect. This article provides general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

7 Comments
John Abernethy
July 07, 2024

Thanks Julie

Obviously the focus for the ATO will ( initially) be on SMSFs in pension mode because the value of the fund determines or affects:

1. The pension payout amount per annum; and
2. The tax free thresholds on entering pension stage from accumulation stage.

However, the possibility of the unrealised tax on capital gains for a SMSF above $3 million in value per beneficiary will see increase scrutiny of larger funds.

Presumably, the valuation costs is a tax deductible expense for a tax paying fund?

Meanwhile assets held individually, through trusts or private companies do not need to be valued - unless and until the unrealised capital gains tax proposal drifts into other investment structures.

My point being that the Opposition is not vocal enough on its policy to vote against unrealised capital gains tax and every self funded retiree needs to be concerned about this tax proposal.

Franz
July 07, 2024

I’m guessing the motivation for not revaluing a direct property investment really bites in the pension phase. A property may have appreciated so much in the last few years and thus form such a large part of the fund, the minimum withdrawal cannot be paid without selling the property.

Tim
July 05, 2024

I have found a program to manage these issues for my reporting. I use Sharesight for all these needs.
I use a report in it that works as the perfect way to look at valuation from the beginning of the year to the end of the financial year including listed and unlisted assets.
I use another report to report on asset allocation.

rob
July 05, 2024

Any rules on Unlisted Share Options that are "in the money"? Simplistically it should be closing price of Ord Stock as at June 30th minus the Exercise price but the ATO is rarely simple!

George
July 05, 2024

Not sure why people do not provide annual valuations on unlisted property investment as annual valuations are always provided by the managers of the trusts. I have many and have never had a problem.
Must be just laziness on the part of some people.

Aussie HIFIRE
July 07, 2024

Presumably many of the unlisted assets here are single rental or commercial properties rather than unlisted property trusts.

Expenses for these types of property are already fairly high (I use one third of the gross yield as a rule of thumb) and people don't want to have to add getting a valuation every 12 months to the list of expenses, particularly if they're not planning on selling and don't want to potentially have to pay more tax or a higher pension especially if the cash flow wouldn't support it.

Paul Szumski, AAPI, CPV, CPP (Fin)
July 04, 2024

As a Registered Valuer with over 30 years' experience, I have seen many "valuations" completed for SMSF's provided by non-valuers that would not meet said standards. Many have no "objective and supportable data" included, and it would seem have been completed by parties with vested interests i.e., not at arm's length. Time to clean up this part of the SMSF equation given the size of the pool of funds and its large current and future effects of the Australia economy.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

How super members can avoid missing out on tax deductions

Watch your SMSF’s annual return this year

Navigating SMSF property compliance

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 627 with weekend update

This week, I got the news that my mother has dementia. It came shortly after my father received the same diagnosis. This is a meditation on getting old and my regrets in not getting my parents’ affairs in order sooner.

  • 4 September 2025

5 charts every retiree must see…

Retirement can be daunting for Australians facing financial uncertainty. Understand your goals, longevity challenges, inflation impacts, market risks, and components of retirement income with these crucial charts.

Why super returns may be heading lower

Five mega trends point to risks of a more inflation prone and lower growth environment. This, along with rich market valuations, should constrain medium term superannuation returns to around 5% per annum.

Super crosses the retirement Rubicon

Australia's superannuation system faces a 'Rubicon' moment, a turning point where the focus is shifting from accumulation phase to retirement readiness, but unfortunately, many funds are not rising to the challenge.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Why I dislike dividend stocks

If you need income then buying dividend stocks makes perfect sense. But if you don’t then it makes little sense because it’s likely to limit building real wealth. Here’s what you should do instead.

Superannuation

Meg on SMSFs: Indexation of Division 296 tax isn't enough

Labor is reviewing the $3 million super tax's most contentious aspects: lack of indexation and the tax on unrealised gains. Those fighting for change shouldn’t just settle for indexation of the threshold.

Shares

Will ASX dividends rise over the next 12 months?

Market forecasts for ASX dividend yields are at a 30-year low amid fears about the economy and the capacity for banks and resource companies to pay higher dividends. This pessimism seems overdone.

Shares

Expensive market valuations may make sense

World share markets seem toppy at first glance, though digging deeper reveals important nuances. While the top 2% of stocks are pricey, they're also growing faster, and the remaining 98% are inexpensive versus history.

Fixed interest

The end of the strong US dollar cycle

The US dollar’s overvaluation, weaker fundamentals, and crowded positioning point to further downside. Diversifying into non-US equities and emerging market debt may offer opportunities for global investors.

Investment strategies

Today’s case for floating rate notes

Market volatility and uncertainty in 2025 prompt the need for a diversified portfolio. Floating Rate Notes offer stability, income, and protection against interest rate risks, making them a valuable investment option.

Strategy

Breaking down recent footy finals by the numbers

In a first, 2025 saw AFL and NRL minor premiers both go out in straight sets. AFL data suggests the pre-finals bye is weakening the stranglehold of top-4 sides more than ever before.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.