Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 448

The death of the single-industry superannuation fund

Gerard Noonan (left, below) and Graeme Russell, colleagues who became good friends, were a great pairing at Media Super. They had the sort of relationship, as Chair and Chief Executive, that organisations crave.

They agreed on most things to do with the fund, which survived and thrived during their tenure together, except for one major thing – whether or not the fund should merge with a bigger fund.

To merge or not to merge?

In Noonan’s view, APRA had shifted its stance from being neutral on mergers to one of actively promoting them. In some cases, aided by the introduction of the Your Future Your Super legislation, APRA has engaged in coercion to rid the industry of what it determines a ‘dud’ fund.


Source: APRA 2021 Year in Review

But more importantly in his eyes, Noonan had increasingly come to the realisation that notwithstanding Media Super’s solid and continued above-average performance, there was a small coterie of very big funds which consistently outperformed by up to 1% per year. Noonan has said:

“Graeme took the view that we could still outperform, whereas I had shifted in my view.”

While he did not win that now-unwinnable argument, Russell was at least able to demonstrate how a small fund could outperform. After former CIO Jon Glass left Media Super in March 2014 and until Michael McQueen joined in January 2020, Russell was both Chief Executive and CIO. The fund did, in that time, jump a few notches up the ladder, joining the top-quintile ranks in some metrics for several periods.

Industry and fund knowledge

Russell trained as an accountant and had a career in management and business consulting prior to becoming the Chief Executive of a super fund, the timber industry’s First Super, before taking that role at Media Super in 2013.

While not a classically trained investment professional, Russell knew Media Super and its members perhaps better than anyone except Noonan. He had been a trustee director of the fund for two years before becoming Chief Executive and a trustee of its predecessor fund, JUST Super, for 19 years. Noonan, a renowned journalist who exits along with the rest of the board in April 2022 with consummation of the merger with Cbus, has notched up 30 years as trustee, starting with JUST, with 12 of those as Chair. Susan Heaney, who runs a large printing company, became Chair in October 2020.

Russell was quoted as saying on his retirement:

"I think it's disappointing that government and the regulators don't understand the important contribution that industry-specific super funds make to their industries, beyond superannuation.”

He said, as the first wave of Covid-19 was biting hard in June that year:

"We're about to see that clearly, as funds like Media Super step up to support members and companies struggling through the current economic dislocation and job losses."

It's not only in times of crisis that the single-industry fund - what was commonly termed a ‘craft fund’ - can provide additional comfort to its members. The better access to management and their understanding of the members’ interests, affords members greater peace of mind.

Noonan understands the benefits that a craft fund offers, as well he should. He often tells the story of when he was The Sydney Morning Herald’s Education Editor sitting in the big open-plan newsroom while a trustee for the craft fund was there with a small queue of people wanting to ask him about their super.

“When you work in an office with perhaps 400-500 people, you are bumping into them all day every day. I had to keep reminding myself that I was actually employed there as a journo. They liked the access. They liked the idea that it was a ‘mutual’. Bigger funds couldn’t do that.”

Noonan, a Walkley Award winner who became the Editor of The Australian Financial Review for five years, best tells the story of his demise there at the hands of the company’s then part-owner Conrad Black in an article for the SMH first published in 2007.

He was able to wear his dismissal as a badge of honour, probably impressing his former colleagues and other media people more than winning that Walkley.

Number of large funds heading for single digits

Despite the hesitations about a merger with a much bigger fund, as many other industry funds will continue to do until the number of funds probably gets close to single digits, both Noonan and Russell had a lot of personal experience with mergers.

On 1 July 2008, for instance, Russell was a Trustee Director of JUST Super, which was in the process of merging with Print Super, as well as a trustee of what was then the timber industry fund TISS, which became FIRST. On that day, he says, he was involved in two concurrent mergers with five funds wrapped up in the transactions.

Noonan’s experience pre-dates even that. JUST’s first merger, in 1992, was with the fund representing actors and entertainers, JEST, which was prompted more by a merger of trade unions supporting the two funds than the separate cohorts of members.

The possibility of a merger between JUST and Print Super was mooted fairly early in the piece, but discussions did not become serious for more than a decade later, and even then took several years to consummate.

Both JUST and Print Super were formed in 1987, in the first rush of industry funds that followed the introduction of the 3% Award Super deal between the ACTU and the Hawke Government in 1986.

In a sense, a whole new industry grew up from that period, including the retail and institutional investment trade press with the launch of Money Management and Super Review titles also in 1987.

When they came together in 2008, with Noonan as the new Chair, JUST and Print Super had just over $3 billion under management. As they exit into Cbus, they have $7 billion (as of June last year), expanding the Cbus assets to about $72 billion.

The end of Media Super

Media Super held its third and final members’ annual meeting on 24 February 2022. It was a virtual meeting so it was impossible to tell whether any tears were shed among the 300-odd participants.

Most of the more-than 50 questions directed at the eight trustees plus executives present, were to do with personal financial matters and the logistics of the merger. Susan Heaney and Chief Executive Tony Griffin stressed the benefits which would start to be seen from 26 April which is the scheduled date for Cbus services to kick in.

Mergers are complicated. At a technical level, Media Super’s 74,000 members will be given new account numbers as they are transferred to Cbus’s admin platform (from Mercer to Link). More complicated than that has been Cbus’s investment structure changes to accommodate Media Super’s unit pricing system with the bigger fund’s crediting rates system.

Heaney said that size would deliver more benefits to members. There would be a greater range of investment options; it would be easier to diversify investments and increase returns. Fees and charges could be lower.

Later this year, the handful of members who had chosen Media’s infrastructure option, which was closed in 2020 because it had become uneconomical to administer, would be able to access Cbus’s new unlisted version, as well as an unlisted property option.

She said that the Media Super ‘brand’ would also be retained, which is becoming common practice in such mergers. Maritime Super, another of the few remaining craft funds, will retain its brand when it undertakes a full merger with HostPlus next year. It is unclear what this means in practice and how long it will last.

More importantly for Media Super, especially those members who like the notion of being part of a group of like-minded people, Cbus has undertaken to form a Media Super advisory committee to its own board. This is expected to consist of some former Media trustees alongside Cbus representatives.

When Media was canvassing the field to ascertain which big fund it should pursue as a merger partner, it appointed the former Rice Warner actuarial advisory firm (now a part of Deloitte) to assist. The decision was thought to be very close, with Cbus pipping AustralianSuper at the post and with the proposed advisory committee allegedly an important factor in the decision.

 

Greg Bright is a freelance journalist and publisher specialising in funds management and superannuation. He is a co-founder of Super Review, now published by FE fundinfo. He was a contributing employer to both JUST and Print Super since 1987.

 

  •   2 March 2022
  • 9
  •      
  •   
9 Comments
Jack
March 02, 2022

Thanks for this important record, Greg, as many of these specialist funds are lost. I'm far from convinced bigger is better, and it was good that you highlighted to personal and direct relationship of these small funds.

David M
March 02, 2022

Too much focus is made on the benefits of scale & no thought seems to be made on what is lost. Great article highlighting some of what is lost. Anyone rang AustralianSuper recently? 2 weeks for research, 90 minute wait times, no doubt as they stuggle with their growth.

James
March 02, 2022

Also bitterly disappointing for Media Super’s ethical investors - Cbus has no ethical investment options! Investors have been told that they will be moved to a Cbus fund which has top holdings of fossil fuels (including Whitehaven Coal!), gambling, alcohol, etc – basically everything that they had wanted to screen out.

George
March 02, 2022

Regardless of how much the Liberals hate the industry funds, this merger business is creating some massive allocators with ability to control capital and direct company behaviour. As Greg says, the single industry funds are going. Now the new Australian Retirement Trust with its $230 billion and 2 million members is gobbling up Aussie Post Super Scheme ($8 billion and 30,000 members).

Ode to the Small Competitor
March 02, 2022

APRA is consistent, it did the same to credit unions. Big is better. All were forced to become a bank. My view is APRA would like One Super Fund for Australia and that would be so easy to regulate. There is no understanding of the benefit of competition to make things better. Examples of lack of competition leading to lessor outcomes abound in the history of business and governement alike. Will One Big Fund get community engagement that APRA and ASIC seem to want? No, large institutions rarely create community engagement. I can find a cheaper fees alternative to Australian Super but that is big ... 

Former CEO of a small financial institution
March 02, 2022

Ode, I think you've misunderstood. APRA didn't force anyone to become a bank. They all became "Authorised Depository Institutions" if they signed up to being eligible for the government guarantee for depositors after the GFC. Many chose to call themselves banks, but not all.
But the end result is we have a lot of competition in that space. Contrary to your point about APRA not valuing competition, in levelling the playing field they created more competition in banking.

Chanpreet
March 02, 2022

As someone who worked as a superannuation consultant (the one whom you ring for any superannuation query) I can tell from my experience that the thought process of having fewer super funds was actually good. There were just too many small funds who were really struggling to give good returns. They might have great customer service model but at the end of the day returns are more important than customer service as even minor fluctuation can impact balance and hence retirement income. (ask an average retiree difference between an income of $50 a week)
My view is that we shouldn't end up like banks with just 4 or 5 major funds. A dozen of them would serve us all well

mal
March 03, 2022

too many super funds seemed to have invested in russia and china without members knowing that there money is been used in child labour etc.

SMSF Trustee
March 03, 2022

mal - evidence please? What data do you have from super funds to support this rather blanket statement.

Also, please strip out those super funds who are doing what their members want them to do, which is to invest in index funds to keep fees down. You get what you pay for, mate. A choice to index is a choice to let market listings dictate what you've invested in, rather than active management.

The funds that I deal with all have absolutely minimal if any exposure to Russian or Chinese government investments. What Russian investments they do have are in listed companies, including those listed on the London stock exchange, and which have been looked into for their ESG characteristics. Not always well, but you get my point.

You can't just walk into a room and throw accusations like that around without justifying it with evidence rather than emotion.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

SMSF returns competitive with big funds at $200,000

The pros and cons of taking the DIY super route

Are you better off in a large superannuation fund?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.