Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 637

The mystery behind modern spending choices

We’re living in a time of paradoxes.

As we explore the consumer landscape, we see it shaped by both innovation and change and timeless human needs. In this tension lies a powerful story: of consumers seeking both speed and meaning, digital convenience and personal connection, individual empowerment and community belonging.

There are the trends like the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automation to demographic shifts, global connectivity, and sustainability demands are rewriting the rules of engagement. Yet amid this flux, timeless human drivers remain, such as trust, authenticity, and purpose. These are not just buzzwords but benchmarks for brands seeking relevance. The paradoxes are stark. Consumers crave simplicity in an age of abundance. They demand transparency in a world of curated realities. They are globally minded but hyper-local in values. These juxtapositions don’t signal confusion, they reveal a complex, evolving consumer shaped by layered expectations.

To navigate this terrain, organisations must become both agile and anchored, embracing change while staying grounded in human-centric drivers. In decoding these paradoxes, we explore the roadmap to meaningful connection in a rapidly transforming world. Here are the megatrends shaping the consumer landscape.

1. Living longer, spending later

As we look across the operating environment today, the purchasing lifecycle is no longer linear, or age bound. Wealth is held by older generations who are living and spending longer, while younger generations, often without buying power yet, hold cultural and household influence. We see that the intergenerational commerce landscape is shifting.

Older Baby Boomers (aged 65-74), comprise 9% of the Australian population, yet hold 26% of national wealth and continue to spend despite their lower relative income. While Gen Xs (aged 45-54), who comprise 12% of the population, have just 17% of national wealth despite being the highest income earners. With an average annual household income of 158k.

By comparison Gen Z/Y in their early earning years comprise 15% of the population and hold just 5% of national wealth. And have an average household income of 128k.

Historically financial power was directly linked to consumer decision making power. Today, however, people are spending throughout the lifecycle. There is a young, empowered generation coming through and purchasing decisions are no longer siloed by age. We even see that older generations are spending longer, and not even necessarily on themselves and today’s Gen Alpha children, yet to enter their earning years, are influencing household spend and purchasing decisions.

55% of families with dependent children agree their grandparents often buy day to day items for their household or children. Therefore Older people aren’t retiring from consumer culture but many are purchasing for self but also for others, which is fuelling the rise in the Grandparent economy.

2. Hyper-global and reengaging locally

Brands today are expected to have the systems, reach and convenience of a global organisation but the authenticity, and identity of a local organisation. Online marketplaces have been growing, while so too has the support of local businesses. When we asked why do you choose to purchase from an offshore retailer we can see that price is a key motivator, followed by availability. For 34% the convenience aspect comes into play as does access to a wide range of products or brands, leaning more into the convenience factor is international shipping offers or free delivery.

On the flip side the number one driver for supporting a local business is to support the local economy or community, followed by a desire to see or try the product in person. For two in five they see local providing better customer service or a more personalised experience. There is also greater trust in product quality or authenticity. Similar to global purchasing the convenience aspect comes into play with faster delivery or same day pickup.

3. Private by principle, public by practice

Today’s customers are empowered and want to take their data back. Over the past few years there has been a shift from tech optimism to tech scepticism.

In 2021 the percentage who would rather increase their data privacy and forego a more personalized experience was 59%, today that is 78%. What is interesting though is that this is not limited to older generations with Gen Z 1.8 times more likely to value data privacy today than they were in 2021 (79% 2024 cf. 44% Gen Z). This tech scepticism is influencing behaviour with more people valuing their data privacy and foregoing a more personalised experience.

However, many are still engaged in social commerce. This is buying and selling goods alongside referring friends and influencing spend through social media platforms, which by nature are platforms designed to harvest data. We are seeing that social commerce is blurring the lines between privacy and experience.

4. Outsourced ownership

Twenty years ago, music was owned, today it is streamed; cars were owned, now many are leased. A trade off with this ongoing accessibility is a loss of permanence. Today, people may pay less upfront, but they are paying always.  When considering generational attitudes towards these subscriptions, it became clear that Gen Z and Gen Y are more likely than their older counterparts to love or like subscriptions, with as the emerging generation of consumers is seeing the rise in the subscription economy.

Established generations, however, are more likely to hate it or not like it. Generational use of subscriptions is reflective of their sentiment. Gen Z who are most positive towards subscriptions are also the highest users of subscriptions. Convenience, followed by value for money, access to exclusive content. For three in ten they identified that sometimes subscriptions are the only option, and for a quarter they found that regular payments make it easier to budget.

5. Cutting back, yet also premiumisation

We’re in a cost-of-living crisis. You probably hear it everywhere. People are cutting back because of this. Yet, we are also seeing premiumisation which is when people spend on luxuries.

Interestingly this isn’t a new phenomenon. Back in the early 2000s, Estée Lauder noticed an odd trend: when recessions hit, lipstick sales spiked. Economist Juliet Schor had already put words to it – the Lipstick Effect.

Our research shows that almost 77% of Australians are extremely or very concerned over the rising cost of living. But, a similar proportion 69%, agree that even when tightening spending in some areas, they choose to splurge on little luxuries that make them feel good. What this shows, is that even during economic strain, consumption decisions are entwined with identity. Buying things can make us feel good, meet our needs or even display status to those around us.

6. Environmental concern amidst consumer pragmatism

Today’s consumers are more environmentally conscious than ever, yet they also face real world constraints like time, money and convenience. 57% of consumers say they have had to compromise their social responsibility values to purchase a cheaper product. However people are also willing to invest in quality pieces that last a long time.

In an interesting twist, younger generations are more likely than their older counterparts to purchase something cheap even though they know it’s bad for the environment. Although younger generations are often the most vocal about environmental sustainability, we’ve seen them be pretty impacted by the rising cost of living, and therefore the least able to financially support their consumer values. Customers have their values. But they are also seeking value.

7. Post-materialism in a hyper material world

For many, material wealth is increasing, but at the same time, overall satisfaction is decreasing. 52% agree that the more they own, the less satisfaction they seem to get from new purchases. People are making room for meaning, with 77% of consumers agreeing they are more interested in experiences and meaning than accumulating material possessions.

People have a void which material possessions are not satisfying in the way they used to. There is still a desire, however, to use purchases to communicate identity and values. As the focus shifts to investing in community and meaning, there is an opportunity for organisations here to provide brand experiences that create belonging and identity expression to combat isolation and loneliness.

Despite the tides of change and these paradoxes, some timeless human needs have remained the same, and they are worth exploring when thinking about consumer behaviour and decisions.

 

Mark McCrindle is a social analyst, demographer, author, and Founder of McCrindle Research. Mark has presented keynotes and workshops in all major industries including finance, technology, health, mining, energy and education.

 

  •   12 November 2025
  • 3
  •      
  •   
3 Comments
steve jeffrey
November 16, 2025

I was born in 1946 , the start of the baby boom, my youngest in 1963! Generations do not happen faster than the 1st generation mature, 9years looks ridiculous. Article was interesting though.

1
John
November 17, 2025

I don’t believe I’ve read an article that articulates the variables you’ve mentioned.
It made for very interesting reading. Thanks.

1
 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Which generation had it toughest?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Testamentary trusts have secured the CGT exemption

Treasury’s latest CGT reform draft delivers a win for testamentary trusts and deceased estates, exempting estate-derived gains from the 30% floor. However, questions on death and divorce rollovers remain unresolved.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Latest Updates

Planning

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

Superannuation

There's a reason why your super is locked up until your 60s

For decades, it seemed settled. Then one controversial idea reignited a debate that could reshape the financial future of millions. The real question isn’t who’s right or wrong, but whether a long-held assumption deserves another look.

Property

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Retirement

Under-retiring: The greatest retirement risk in a generation

Two retirees. Similar savings. Completely different lives. New research from Challenger reveals why some Australians confidently spend in retirement while others hold back and the overlooked factor shaping retirement decisions.

Five risks to watch in markets

Things you may often hear are: a recession is around the corner, markets are overpriced, the AI sector is about to flop at any moment. It’s like the never-ending laundry pile that sits in my house, it never really disappears.

Investment strategies

Do you qualify as ‘rich’?

What does it mean to be 'rich'? For something so universally desired, it is surprisingly difficult to define. That ambiguity creates a challenge for investors and raises a bigger question about what financial success really looks like.

Investment strategies

If you’re worried about your bond portfolio, you’re missing the point

Most investors think they know what bonds are for. But when markets turn volatile, a surprising misunderstanding can lead to costly decisions. Here’s the overlooked lesson that could change how you view your portfolio.

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.