Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 213

The rise of socially responsible investing

Ethical or socially responsible investing (SRI), which focuses on environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria, has been around for a while. More recently, other names have emerged such as sustainable or green investing.

SRI has been gaining traction recently with investments into 'core' responsible investment up 26% (according to Responsible Investment Association Australasia (RIAA)) to $64.9 billion or 4.5% of Australia's total assets under management. 'Core' responsible investment approaches mean that at least one of the primary strategies applies, including: negative, positive or norms-based screening (adherence to global norms on environmental protection, human rights, labour standards, and anti-corruption); sustainability themed investing; impact investing, community finance; or corporate engagement.

Beating mainstream funds over the long term

The SRI industry makes a strong case that returns are not forfeited by this investing approach. A report launched recently by the RIAA showed “‘core’ responsibly invested Australian share funds and balanced multi-sector funds have outperformed their equivalent mainstream funds over three, five and 10-year horizons” to 31 December 2016 (the benchmark being S&P/ASX 300 accumulation index). One major player, Australian Ethical Investment Ltd (ASX:AEX) was established in 1986 and now has over $1.5 billion under management, returning 10% p.a. to its investors over the last 20 years.

SRI covers a broad subjective range of industries and practices. What is unethical to one person may not be to another, which leads to many different types of SRI, and difficulties pinpointing one strategy for all. RIAA says that nearly half of Australian funds (44%) are using some form of responsible investing strategies that include one or more of the following: negative screening, impact investing, sustainability themed funds and the integration of ESG considerations.

To see a positive outcome and return on SRI, a long-term approach must be taken. Factors such as changing working conditions, educating workers, restoring the environment or turning a building green take time and money. Long-term returns depend on the sustainability of the companies’ initiatives to remain ethical.

Benchmark concerns

One of the issues with SRI is the lack of a performance benchmark. An index such as S&P/ASX200 may not be an accurate comparison. The Materials sector is 16% of the S&P/ASX200 index and BHP Billiton is nearly 5% of the index. Excluding BHP (plus other miners that do not meet ESG standards) means a significant underweight to a major sector and stock. Miners are more likely to be excluded from SRI funds because of environmental impact or fossil fuel mining and coal seam gas. The absence of mining stocks, in particular BHP and Rio Tinto, in ethical funds would have benefitted performance of the funds during the downturn in the mining cycle, especially since 2010

Banks may be screened out because of their lending to coal mining companies. Australian Ethical Investments only holds Westpac (6.3% of the index) and does not hold the other three major banks, although there are holdings in other financial service companies and smaller banks. Excluding the major banks (24% of the index) would be a big dent in a SRI fund’s exposure to the index S&P/ASX200.

In global portfolios, companies that avoid paying tax in Australia or promote unhealthy lifestyles may not get the tick. Apple, for example, makes most of its money in Ireland due to the Irish government granting the company special tax status. Apple Australia’s net profit for its financial year to September 2016, fell 97% on the back of a tax ‘adjustment’ for previous years. The ‘Google Tax’ applying from 1 July 2017 may lead to changes in the multinationals’ tax affairs.

Passive ETFs and ethical companies

The increasing popularity of passive exchange traded funds (ETFs) in Australia also raises the question of how these funds can meet ESG requirements. It is impossible for a broad-based index ETF to be considered ethical as they are currently structured, as they simply track the broad benchmark with no ethical screening.

For example, around 69% of Vanguard’s funds are broad-based and passive, according to Barrons, which limits its ethical stance. However, on Vanguard’s website is the statement “as one of the world's largest investment managers, we recognize that our voice carries considerable weight. Because the funds' holdings tend to be long term in nature (in the case of index funds, we're essentially permanent shareholders), it's crucial that we demand the highest standards of governance from the companies in which our funds invest”. Recently Vanguard has stepped up its corporate governance by requiring Exxon to report on its impact on climate change, alongside some other big fund managers including BlackRock and State Street Global Advisors.

BlackRock, one of Vanguard’s major competitors, has been more proactive around corporate governance but also would find it difficult to incorporate into its passive ETFs.

Ethical ETFs listed in Australia

However, several ETF issuers have introduced ‘ethical’ ETFs to Australia to meet the growing investor demand and attention on the SRI issue, as listed below:

Source: ETF Watch as at 27 July 2017

BetaShares launched the Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ASX:ETHI) with its objective being to “provide exposure to 100 large global stocks (excluding Australia) which are climate change leaders and which are not materially engaged in activities deemed inconsistent with responsible investment considerations”. The benchmark is Nasdaq Future Global Sustainability Leaders Index which is provided by Nasdaq.

The Russell Investments Australian Responsible Investment ETF (ASX:RARI) “provides investors with a simple, cost-effective and transparent means of accessing an environmental, social, and governance (ESG) enhanced portfolio of Australian shares”, by tracking a “custom-built, smart-beta index”, Russell Australia ESG High Dividend Index. A custom-built index is one way around the problem of creating a passive ETF that meets ESG criteria. It is worth noting that all four big banks are held (total weight of 32% as at 27 July 2017) in the underlying basket of stocks, so in their view banks are not failing to be socially responsible. BHP and Rio are not part of the basket.

UBS manages six ETFs using MSCI benchmarks but only exclude tobacco companies and dangerous weapon manufacturers. MSCI Australia would not be overly exposed to these two industries so investing in the broader indexes is just as effective for a lower fee.

In other developments, a new roboadvisor called Balance Impact will launch soon, using SRI screens to actively select stocks and ETFs for other parts of its asset allocation process.

Demand will continue to grow

SRI will be a growing part of the managed fund and ETF industry driven by consumer demand due to the increasing focus on social change and global warming. Millennials, a larger cohort than baby boomers, is particularly pushing the demand alongside other generations. According to the 2015 Nielsen Global Corporate Sustainability Report, “66% of global consumers say they’re willing to pay more for sustainable brands – up 55% from 2014.” Furthermore, 73% of global millennials are happy to pay extra for sustainable products, which is up from 50% in 2014.

 

Rosemary Steinfort is a Research Coordinator at Cuffelinks, and recently attended the launch of the RIAA Benchmark Report 2017.

RELATED ARTICLES

Wirecard shows not all ethical ETFs pass the smell test

Discovering the good and the bad among ethical ETFs

Four reasons ESG investing continues to grow

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Unexpected results in our retirement income survey

Who knew? With some surprise results, the Government is on unexpected firm ground in asking people to draw on all their assets in retirement, although the comments show what feisty and informed readers we have.

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

Six COVID opportunist stocks prospering in adversity

Some high-quality companies have emerged even stronger since the onset of COVID and are well placed for outperformance. We call these the ‘COVID Opportunists’ as they are now dominating their specific sectors.

Latest Updates

Retirement

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Interviews

Sean Fenton on marching to your own investment tune

Is it more difficult to find stocks to short in a rising market? What impact has central bank dominance had over stock selection? How do you combine income and growth in a portfolio? Where are the opportunities?

Compliance

D’oh! DDO rules turn some funds into a punching bag

The Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO) come into effect in two weeks. They will change the way banks promote products, force some small funds to close to new members and push issues into the listed space.

Shares

Dividends, disruption and star performers in FY21 wrap

Company results in FY21 were generally good with some standout results from those thriving in tough conditions. We highlight the companies that delivered some of the best results and our future  expectations.

Fixed interest

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Investment strategies

Seven factors driving growth in Managed Accounts

As Managed Accounts surge through $100 billion for the first time, the line between retail, wholesale and institutional capabilities and portfolios continues to blur. Lower costs help with best interest duties.

Retirement

Reader Survey: home values in age pension asset test

Read our article on the family home in the age pension test, with the RBA Governor putting the onus on social security to address house prices and the OECD calling out wealthy pensioners. What is your view?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.