Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 597

The two key risks facing investors

In the middle of 2024, my mantra was 'don’t overthink it': positive nominal growth and interest rate cuts were supportive of equity markets, even against the backdrop of stretched valuations in the US.

Moving into 2025, I maintain that stance as I expect corporate earnings to hold up and, for now, inflation is still moving in the right direction. But two risks weigh on my mind.

First, will higher bond yields imperil equities? Since 2020 we have been talking about a shift in the market regime. The 2010s were characterised by tight fiscal policy and zero interest rates. It was an era we might describe as “Adam Smith on steroids”, the theory being that individuals and businesses acting in their own self-interest would create positive outcomes for the economy. It was the invisible hand operating on a global scale.

However, this led to excessive income inequality and a feeling that the average person in the West wasn’t doing well enough out of the system. This, in turn, has led to political support for populist policies and a new consensus focused on looser fiscal policy, protectionism and higher interest rates.

Looser fiscal policy implies higher borrowing. Right now, the UK is under scrutiny with a significant rise in gilt yields since the Budget in October 2024. This volatility highlights how fiscal policy is a much more important driver of markets than was the case a decade ago. But while the UK may be feeling the heat today this is not a one-country problem.

In many regions, an ageing demographic plus the need to spend elsewhere, including on defence, will lead to higher debt levels. These will then become the ultimate speed limit to market returns.

This is because the ultimate constraint on populist policies will be their consequences for inflation and debt levels and the willingness of bondholders to accept this. Government spending has helped support economies, but this might be storing up problems for equities in the future with excesses in the system that would normally be addressed in a downturn.

Equity valuations can be sustained as long as bond yields don’t rise too far. With the US 10-year government bond yield now around 4.8%, we are starting to move into a more dangerous zone for equity valuations relative to bonds. Higher bond yields can draw money away from the stock market as well as increasing borrowing costs for corporates.

Tactically, I find it interesting that after a couple of years of predicting a US downturn or recession, most market commentators including us are predicting a positive outcome for the US economy. This could mean that, from a contrarian perspective, we get some relief on bond yields in the short term, especially as US interest rate cuts are almost priced out for 2025. But high bond yields are a risk we need to keep an eye on for the year.

The second challenge is the level of concentration in market-cap weighted indices. In recent years, when comparing the current environment with the late 1990s dotcom era, our view at Schroders was that the strong earnings growth delivered by the mega cap tech stocks in this cycle made it very different to the speculative bubble of 1999/2000.

Back then, valuations were impossible to justify. This time around, many of the large US tech companies are delivering earnings that support their valuations. However, a misstep by one of these companies would pose risk to overall market returns given their dominance of major indices.

Wall Street’s blue-chip benchmark has a high concentration in just a handful of stocks

In fact, the level of index concentration far surpasses that of the late 1990s. From a portfolio standpoint, having such a high exposure to just a handful of stocks does not feel prudent. What’s more, the dynamics behind each of the ‘Magnificent 7’ vary. Treating them as a block underestimates the different business drivers between the individual companies. Given the concentrated nature of the market, this is not a time for unintentional bets.

These US risks are shared with other markets. Market concentration is similarly high in Europe and Japan. Investors relying on previous winners to drive performance are already starting to miss out. Since mid-2024, we have seen a much more interesting path for markets with different sectors performing at different times.

The full implications of DeepSeek’s technology still need to be understood. But it highlights that markets are vulnerable to a misstep by one of the large US megacaps, or by the emergence of new competition.

At a time when major equity indices do not offer the diversification they did in the past, and the shift in the political consensus is altering correlations across asset classes, investors will need to work harder to build resilient portfolios.

 

This article first appeared in The Financial Times on 15 January 2025.

Johanna Kyrklund is Group Chief Investment Officer (CIO) and Global Head of Multi-Asset Investments at Schroders, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This material is general information only and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Schroders does not give any warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information which is contained in this material. For important information and disclaimers, click here.

For more articles and papers from Schroders, click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Why Europe is back on the global investor map

Can quantitative tightening help tame inflation?

Which asset class in Australia offers the best value now?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.