Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 111

There's nothing sleepy about Rip Van Winkle indexing

Graham Hand recently attended the Research Affiliates Advisory Panel conference in California, featuring presentations by many of the world’s leading investment professionals. The innovative paper reviewed here uses ‘stale’ prices to compile a ‘cap-weighted’ portfolio, with surprising results. The full academic paper will be published in the Summer 2015 edition of the Journal of Portfolio Management (JPM). Research Affiliates and JPM gave permission for this summary to be released in advance of the full paper.

There’s no doubting the spectacular success of ‘passive’ investing based on the market capitalisation weights of companies. It is estimated that almost 20% of all managed fund assets are based on cap-weighted indexes, up from less than 9% in 1998. It is based on the theory that in an efficient market where equity prices reflect all known information about a company, there is no capacity for a talented analyst to outperform, and a portfolio that uses the most up-to-date prices should deliver the best results. On the other hand, even if the market is not efficient, then surely the active manager with the timeliest information has the best chance to outperform (ie, deliver ‘alpha’).

Researchers at the California-based index and asset allocation specialists, Research Affiliates, have tested another theory, which they call the ‘Rip Van Winkle’ approach. The story goes that the idle Rip Van Winkle fell asleep for 20 years after a drinking session, and he woke to a vastly different world. What if we did this with a cap-weighted investment portfolio by discarding 20 years of market data?

The table shows the market cap of the Top 10 companies in the United States over the last 20 years at five-year intervals, and the changes have been dramatic. There are companies in every Top 10, such as General Electric (from 4.1% of the index down to 1.5%), Exxon (from 3.6% to 2.3%) and Wal Mart (from 2.6% to 1.3%). Most have dropped out of the Top 10 over the years, while Apple and Google were nowhere even five years ago.

List of Top 10 stocks in the US at current time plus 5, 10 and 20 years ago (Jan 2014)

GH Table1 290515

GH Table1 290515

How are the performance numbers calculated?

Research Affiliates assumes Rip Van Winkle wakes up and constructs a portfolio reusing the cap weights of the 1,000 largest stocks from when he fell asleep 20 years earlier. He ignores stocks that no longer exist and invests their weight in remaining companies in proportion to their old capitalisations. In subsequent years, he then rebalances back to the stale weights 20 years earlier. For example, since the reliable data starts in 1926, the analysis waits until 1946 to use the 20-year-old cap-weighting data. This gives results over the past 67 years (1946-2013) for a portfolio always weighted back to 20 years ago.

The method produced a risk-adjusted outperformance of 1.8% per annum over the normal cap-weighted index, which would have placed Rip near the top of active managers.

What’s happening? Research Affiliates argues alpha is added by severing the link between the weight of a company in the portfolio and its price. It’s the same argument they make for fundamental indexing, where stocks are weighted according to their economic footprint. Using cap-weights, the more expensive a stock becomes, the heavier its weight in a portfolio, and similarly, the cheaper the stock, the less its weight. Almost anything that breaks this link will outperform, based on the known empirical factors of value and mean reversion.

As with any strategy that deviates from the usual cap-weighted index, there are long periods of disappointment in the results before the market ‘corrects’ itself. Indeed, the results were almost flat for the first 20 years, and then kicked in over the last 47 years, when the incremental returns were almost 3% per annum. This is a lesson in not jumping out of a strategy in the short-term, or leaping on to the latest fad.

The final results are spectacular, with 1.8% per annum compounded from 1947 to 2013 producing nearly three times the value of a cap-weighted portfolio over this time period. Rip’s strategy ignored the tech bubble and wreck of the late 1990s and allocated to financials just like any other year during the GFC. This obliviousness to fears and fads turns into an advantage in following years, especially since the stock values of yesteryear did not carry such valuation excesses.

Investment characteristics of the Rip Van Winkle portfolio

The longer the numbers were lagged in the analysis, the better the results. The longer-lagged indexes were less biased towards today’s most expensive stocks. By severing the link between the price of a stock and its weight in the portfolio, value is added … even when using cap-weights!

The factors leading to the outperformance include a small-cap tilt, due to overweighting companies which are smaller relative to their cap-weights at the end of the measurement period. And there is a value tilt, an anti-momentum bias and of course long-term mean-reversion, all at the economically significant level. But this factor attribution explains only about half the residual alpha, so there is some priced factor missing from the explanation. The analysts invite the finance community to join the hunt.

Some of the great benefits of cap-weighting are the high capacity, strong liquidity and low turnover of a portfolio. Of course, these also apply for Rip’s portfolio. Large companies tend to stay large for many years, and the portfolios both have hundreds of familiar names, with weights that have broad representation in the economy even 67 years later.

Cap-weight portfolios have low turnover because they rebalance automatically. In this analysis, Rip rebalances every year, but turnover is surprisingly not much larger, and significantly less than most active managers.

Sleep on it

The ‘active versus passive’ investing debate has raged for decades. One side argues the cap-weighted index cannot be consistently outperformed and is an optimal portfolio. The other side believes talented active managers with superior analysis and better information can deliver alpha. Both sides accept to differing degrees that opportunities are arbitraged away by competition in the market.

Then along comes Rip Van Winkle, who could not be bothered changing his portfolio weightings for 1,000 companies after he fell asleep for 20 years. He uses the same approach in global equities, including emerging markets, and then repeats the exercise over 67 years of data. It’s not ‘value versus growth’ or ‘active versus passive’. It’s market cap indexing versus market cap indexing with a lag.

Research Affiliates is not arguing that Rip has hit on a great new investing strategy, as there are better choices available. Rather, they explore a crazy idea to support their long-established argument on the benefits of breaking the link between the stocks in a portfolio and their current market price.

And any active manager who could deliver outperformance of almost 2% per annum for a long time would sleep easy on the result and dream of the dollars rolling in.

 

The authors of the research are Robert Arnott, Noah Beck and Vitali Kalesnik of Research Affiliates.

Graham Hand is Editor of Cuffelinks and was a guest at the Research Affiliates Advisory Panel. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, nor an opinion on the appropriateness of any investment. Research Affiliates, LLC does not warrant the accuracy of the information provided herein, either expressed or implied, for any particular purpose.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

What happens when an index is rebalanced?

The abacus, big data and a brief history of indexing

Why equal weighting resolves Australian index skews

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.