Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 434

Tips when taking large withdrawals from super

I recently talked to a client about taking a large benefit (withdrawal) from their SMSF. Believe it or not, there’s a lot to consider in working out how to structure the payment.

Just taking a very large pension amount is often the worst possible thing to do.

What are the alternatives?

It’s easiest to explain the thought process using an example. Consider a couple where John (age 70) has a pension worth $1.65 million that he started several years ago. At the time he fully used up the limit that can be converted to a super pension ($1.6 million at that time). John had a very large super balance so he had super money left over that he left accumulating in his fund. That account (often referred to as an ‘accumulation balance’) is now worth $500,000.

His wife Julie (age 71) also has a pension that’s currently worth $1.65 million but no accumulation balance. In both cases, as they used their $1.6 million limit in full when they first started their pensions, they didn’t get an increase when the general limit was increased to $1.7 million from 1 July 2021.

They’ve always taken the minimum pension in the past (and have done so this year already) but now want to withdraw an extra $400,000 in 2021/22. What should they do? Fortunately, they are both over 65 and so have complete flexibility as to which account they take the extra payment from.

As a pension fund, their SMSF is entitled to a tax exemption on a lot of its investment income. Currently, around 87% of the fund’s capital gains, rent, dividends, interest, managed fund distributions etc is treated as exempt from tax. In practical terms, John and Julie’s fund usually receives a tax refund, thanks to their franking credits. The ‘87%’ is calculated by me as the fund’s actuary each year. I work out what proportion of their fund ‘belongs’ to their two pension accounts. If the pension accounts make up around 87% of the total fund over the year, then 87% (the ‘actuarial percentage’) of the investment income is exempt from tax.

Where to take the payment from

These tax rules make it much more attractive to take their large payment from John’s accumulation account rather than either of their pension accounts. It means that in future years, the proportion of fund income that will be exempt from tax will be closer to 97%. In contrast, if they took this big payment from their pension accounts, the percentage would be 85%.

Would things be any different if Julie also had an accumulation account?

In some ways, yes, as they would need to decide whether to take some of this payment from her accumulation account as well. The main factor to weigh up is the relative sizes. If John’s accumulation account is much bigger, it’s generally better to take it from his, and vice versa. If they are about the same, split the payment between them to even up their accumulation balances.

This is driven by what happens when one of them dies. In Julie’s case, if John died, she may want to leave as much as possible of his super in their SMSF. But she can only do this if she is able to receive it as a pension. Her challenge is that there is a cap on how much she can convert to a pension ($1.6 million), inherited super counts towards this cap and she’s already used it anyway by starting her own pension.

To some degree we can manage this. We can switch off (‘fully commute’) her own pension which will mean $1.65 million is ‘reversed out’ of the amounts that count towards her $1.6 million cap. She can fill that space with up to $1.65 million from John’s super. But anything else in John’s super will have to be paid out of the fund. It would have been better for Julie if some or all of John’s accumulation balance had actually been in her name. She can leave her own super just accumulating in the fund but not John’s.

Since we never know who is going to die first, keeping the accumulation accounts roughly equal hedges our bets.

What about next time?

What if John’s accumulation account eventually gets down to zero and they have another need for an extra payment?

Then the money will need to come from one or both of their pensions. But even then, there is a better answer than just a large pension payment.

They should consider a ‘partial commutation’. Partial commutations feel the same as a pension payment to anyone who receives one but with an important difference: a partial commutation ‘gives back’ some of the $1.6 million pension cap that has already been used up whereas a very large pension payment does not.

Let’s imagine, for example, that sometime in the future John takes a partial commutation of $200,000 from his pension. He will then have an extra $200,000 ‘space’ in his pension cap. That could be really useful if (for example) he and Julie sell their home in the future and make special contributions known as ‘downsizer contributions’. He could convert $200,000 of his downsizer contribution into another pension. If he hadn’t created this space, the whole contribution would need to stay in an accumulation account.

It’s also useful in a scenario if Julie dies and he wants to leave as much as possible of her super in a pension that’s paid to him. Remember that inherited super counts towards the $1.6 million pension cap if it’s paid to the survivor as a pension. John can manage this by switching off some of his own pension to create ‘space’ to absorb a pension from Julie’s super. But the less he switches off the better. If he’s already created some space by taking partial commutations in the past, he’ll be able to leave more of his own pension in place.

Pensions are fantastic structures to have in place in an SMSF but the careful thinking about structuring doesn’t end when the pension starts.

 

Meg Heffron is the Managing Director of Heffron SMSF Solutions. This is general information only and it does not constitute any recommendation or advice. It does not consider any personal circumstances.

 

14 Comments
Jay Wickramanayake
February 05, 2022

Hi Meg
Thanks for your insight into SMSF pensions/accumulations and it has raised a concern for our SMSF pensions.
We have a SMSF from which we (me and my wife) are currently drawing account-based pensions (both of our super pension balances are less than $1,600,000 separately (when we started the pensions the balances were less than that amount separately for both of us). We plan to rollover most of the pensions to two industry funds this year. My understanding is that we can do the rollovers without commuting the SMSF pensions. It would be great if you could please confirm whether my thinking on this is correct. Thanks in advance. Jay

Meg Heffron
February 15, 2022

Hi Jay, technically any rollover of a pension involves a commutation (to stop the pension) followed by a payment to another fund (the rollover). However, the rollover amount doesn't have to be paid out to you first as a lump sum benefit, it can definitely be paid over to the new fund directly. The fact that the pension is technically being commuted does have some ramifications. For example, anyone who fully commutes a pension has to pay it up to date first (so someone doing it about now, would have to make sure they've drawn roughly 8/12ths of the year's pension payments). The pension in your new fund will also be a new pension. That causes problems for some people who have the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card, for example. People whose pensions started before 1 Jan 2015, for instance, can ignore their pensions when it comes to the income test for this card. But a new pension starting after money has been rolled over to a new fund will count for this test because it is a brand new pension.

Jay Wickramanayake
March 26, 2022

Hi Meg
Thanks for your reply and it is a great help. Very much appreciated.
Jay

Fred
November 25, 2021

As I understand it a point that appears to be missing is that one still has to take out the minimum amount from the pension fund in that financial year in addition to whatever lump sum may be taken out of the accumulation fund. Also you have to be over 65 to be able to take the money out of the accumulation fund.

Meg Heffron
November 25, 2021

Thanks Fred, your point about taking out the minimum amount from the pension fund in that financial year in addition to whatever lump sum may be taken out of the accumulation fund is true and it’s a good point to make. I felt it was implicit that the person in the example had already met their pension payments via this sentence: "They’ve always taken the minimum pension in the past but now want to withdraw an extra $400,000 in 2021/22. What should they do?" While to me “an extra $400,000” sounds like “over and above the minimum pension” it’s not entirely clear. It could be reworded to say: They’ve always taken the minimum pension in the past (and have already done so this year) but now want to withdraw an extra $400,000 in 2021/22.” To your last point, you don’t have to be over 65 but your accumulation account does have to be unpreserved. I used the example of someone who was >65 as super is always unpreserved for anyone over 65. It’s almost always the case that someone who was able to start a retirement phase pension has at least some unpreserved accumulation balance. Hope this makes it clearer.

Leisa Bell
November 25, 2021

Hi Fred. Based on Meg's reply, edits have been made to the article to make this clearer.

Justin
November 22, 2021

Whilst it is a first world problem, i would be keen to see how this strategy could be integrated with a defined benefit pension arrangemnt that is greater than the $1.6/7 M limits. i am soon (12monoths away) from being eligible for the PSS pension and am looking at this situation and possible approaches. is there a suggested solution Megan? or as I started with....a first world problem....

Meg Heffron
November 30, 2021

Hi Justin - fortunately with defined benefit pensions that meet all the rules, you can go over the $1.6m / $1.7m limit but only with that pension. So the rest of your super will stay in your accumulation account. Given that your PSS pension is probably restrictive and won't allow you to take any extra money anyway, anything extra you need will have to be taken from your accumulation account which fits nicely with the above.

Katrina
November 21, 2021

This is a great article Meg as it shows the importance of advice. A “simple” withdrawal always has a lot to consider. It is also important to look at the individual components of the individual accounts. The accumulation account might be all tax-free component. Whilst John and Julie are both alive proceeds go to each other tax free. When one passes away - the taxable component may be taxed at 17%. This becomes a large amount if tax if it isn’t dealt with whilst alive. I would also consider taxable components.

Meg Heffron
November 21, 2021

Totally agree Katrina. (I really needed a bigger word limit) You might even have multiple steps - if the accumulation account is all tax free but the pension is taxable, I expect you'd 1. take a partial commutation from the pension (so you withdraw taxable money) and 2. create a new pension with some of your accumulation account (which is tax free) to make sure you still have as much as possible in pension phase. Definitely tax components are very important. Thanks.

Kevin
November 19, 2021

I am in pension phase and also have an accumulation amount because of the cap limit. I think if I took a lump sum from my pension, the grandfathered CSHC card I have would not be grandfathered anymore. Is this correct? Also if I took a lump sum withdrawal from my accumulation account it would not affect the grandfathering of the card as it is not interfering with the pension. Is this correct?

Meg Heffron
February 15, 2022

Actually Kevin, taking a lump sum from your pension doesn't compromise the grandfathering. What's important is whether the pension itself has been continuously in place since before 1 Jan 2015, but it's OK to have taken pension payments and lump sums from it along the way. In contrast, doing something like stopping and restarting it (for example, as part of moving it from one fund to another or combining it with some / all of an accumulation account) would definitely mean the grandfathering would be lost. Check out this article : https://www.heffron.com.au/news/what-not-to-do-with-older-account-based-pensions

Bill
November 18, 2021

George,
Notify your administrator in advance, not after the event. Not effective if notification is retrospective.

George Martin
November 18, 2021

Thanks, Meg, great tips here, save a lot of money by taking a withdrawal from accumulation rather than pension. So I can simply tell my administrator which one I want it marked against?

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Can your SMSF buy a retirement home for you now?

When the $1.6m cap is no longer relevant

What happens at death of an SMSF member?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Lessons when a fund manager of the year is down 25%

Every successful fund manager suffers periods of underperformance, and investors who jump from fund to fund chasing results are likely to do badly. Selecting a manager is a long-term decision but what else?

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

In almost 1,000 responses, our readers differ in voting intentions versus polling of the general population, but they have little doubt who will win and there is widespread disappointment with our politics.

Now you can earn 5% on bonds but stay with quality

Conservative investors who want the greater capital security of bonds can now lock in 5% but they should stay at the higher end of credit quality. Rises in rates and defaults mean it's not as easy as it looks.

30 ETFs in one ecosystem but is there a favourite?

In the last decade, ETFs have become a mainstay of many portfolios, with broad market access to most asset types, as well as a wide array of sectors and themes. Is there a favourite of a CEO who oversees 30 funds?

Betting markets as election predictors

Believe it or not, betting agencies are in the business of making money, not predicting outcomes. Is there anything we can learn from the current odds on the election results?

Meg on SMSFs – More on future-proofing your fund

Single-member SMSFs face challenges where the eventual beneficiaries (or support team in the event of incapacity) will be the member’s adult children. Even worse, what happens if one or more of the children live overseas?

Latest Updates

Superannuation

'It’s your money' schemes transfer super from young to old

Policy proposals allow young people to access their super for a home bought from older people who put the money back into super. It helps some first buyers into a home earlier but it may push up prices.

Investment strategies

Rising recession risk and what it means for your portfolio

In this environment, safe-haven assets like Government bonds act as a diversifier given the uncorrelated nature to equities during periods of risk-off, while offering a yield above term deposit rates.

Investment strategies

‘Multidiscipline’: the secret of Bezos' and Buffett’s wild success

A key attribute of great investors is the ability to abstract away the specifics of a particular domain, leaving only the important underlying principles upon which great investments can be made.

Superannuation

Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.

Shares

Confession season is upon us: What’s next for equity markets

Companies tend to pre-position weak results ahead of 30 June, leading to earnings downgrades. The next two months will be critical for investors as a shift from ‘great expectations’ to ‘clear explanations’ gets underway.

Economy

Australia, the Lucky Country again?

We may have been extremely unlucky with the unforgiving weather plaguing the East Coast of Australia this year. However, on the economic front we are by many measures in a strong position relative to the rest of the world.

Exchange traded products

LIC discounts widening with the market sell-off

Discounts on LICs and LITs vary with market conditions, and many prominent managers have seen the value of their assets fall as well as discount widen. There may be opportunities for gains if discounts narrow.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.