Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 381

Can your SMSF buy a retirement home for you now?

Can you buy your retirement home now in your SMSF and use it when you retire? It may be tempting but is it possible?

Let's look at Garry and Betty who are the directors of the corporate trustee of their SMSF.  They are contemplating acquiring a property through their SMSF, which they plan to lease to an unrelated third party at market value until both of them reach their preservation age and retire as a condition of release.

They want to know whether it is possible for them to reside in the property as their principal place of residence once both of them have reached this condition of release.

There are a few things that Garry and Betty will need to consider to ensure that the transaction complies with superannuation laws.

Issue 1: the sole purpose test

Is purchasing the property now with the intent to reside in it in the future once the members of the SMSF have met a condition of release a breach of the sole purpose test?

SMSF Ruling 2008/2 provides that an SMSF may only be maintained for the sole purpose of providing retirement benefits to the members, or to their dependants if a member dies before retirement. It also provides that in determining whether an SMSF has satisfied the ‘sole purpose’ test, one must consider all the facts and circumstances surrounding the trustee’s behaviour in relation to the acquisition of the property.

For example, if the trustee invests in a property where there is a significant likelihood that the investment in the property will not increase any return for the SMSF and the trustee simply purchased the property because the members always dreamed of retiring to a lovely coastal home, then the ATO may take a sceptical view and rule the transaction a breach of the sole purpose test.

If, on the other hand the trustee has supporting documentation such as valuation reports which shows that the investment property is likely to provide an increase in return for the SMSF, then the sole purpose test may be satisfied, notwithstanding the ancillary purpose.

Issue 2: the property remaining in the SMSF

An SMSF will fail to meet the ‘sole purpose’ test if the SMSF provides a pre-retirement benefit to a member of the SMSF.

If Garry and Betty decide to reside in the property once they have both met a condition of release, they should transfer the property from the SMSF to the members in their personal capacity.

This is to avoid potentially breaching the ‘sole purpose’ test in the event that Garry and Betty residing in the property is treated as a present-day benefit or personal use of an SMSF asset.

Issue 3: capital gains tax and land tax

As a general principle, there is no capital gains tax on a transfer of property between an SMSF and the members of an SMSF in their personal capacity if the property is solely supporting the payment of one or more pensions for the members (i.e. if the property is a segregated current pension asset under the segregation method or under the proportional method if all members interest are in pensions).

If an SMSF sells a property before the members retire, the SMSF is charged 10% capital gains tax.

If an SMSF property is sold whilst all members of the fund are solely in retirement phases, any capital loss realised would be disregarded for tax purposes and cannot be carried forward to offset future capital gains.

In most states and territories, a principal place of residence will not be subject to land tax. As the property will be Garry and Betty’s principal place of residence when acquired, they will not have to pay land tax.

Transfer duty on the transfer from the SMSF to Garry and Betty in their personal capacity will result in transfer duty or nominal duty being paid except in Victoria, the ACT, and Soth Australia where transfer duty on this type of transaction is exempt.

Full ad valorem (‘according to value’) transfer duty is likely to be charged in NSW, Queensland and the NT. In Western Australia, nominal transfer duty of $20 applies in respect of a transfer of, or an agreement for the transfer of, dutiable property from the trustee of an SMSF to a member of the SMSF.

The trustee must still ensure that the in-specie transfer is permitted under the trust deed. If the trust deed is silent on any in-specie transfer, then the trust deed will need to be updated to allow the in-specie transfer to occur.

In summary, while it may seem advantageous to acquire a retirement property through your SMSF with the hope of residing in the property once you retire, there are issues to consider with this type of transaction, particularly ensuring that the SMSF satisfies the sole purpose test. 

 

Elizabeth Wang is a Solicitor at Townsends Business & Corporate Lawyers. This article is for general information only as it does not consider the individual circumstances of any investor. Consult with a legal or financial adviser before acting on any information in this article.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Meg on SMSFs: At last, movement on legacy pensions

Meg on SMSFs: Winding up SMSFs paying a pension requires care

Tips when taking large withdrawals from super

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.