Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 430

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

The increase in stock prices and house prices in Australia in recent years has cast the spotlight on the definition of ‘sophisticated investors’, also known in the investment industry as ‘wholesale investors’.

The definition was last reviewed in 2011 in the Corporations Act. Since then, more and more Australians have been able to satisfy the requirements for this definition without lifting a finger. It is estimated that as many as three million Australians now qualify, but they have become wealthier but no more sophisticated while the number is increasing rapidly.

So what's the catch?

Sophisticated investors can be offered securities without the usual product disclosure requirements that apply to everyday mum and dad investors. Stockbrokers and financial advisers are able to offer sophisticated investors access to investments that cannot go to retail clients, such as some unlisted property investments, bonds and other unlisted investments.

Many companies also prefer dealing only with sophisticated investors. It means smaller and tighter share registers, access to bigger amounts of cash and less compliance issues.

In order to be classified as sophisticated investor, an investor needs gross personal income over the last two years of at least $250,000 or to have assets of more than $2.5 million. They also need sign-off from a qualified accountant. Importantly, the stockbroker or financial adviser also needs to be confident that the investor truly is ‘sophisticated’ – aware of the financial implications of both the advisor’s advice and their investment decisions.

The definition makes it easier to do business

Many advisers prefer dealing with sophisticated or wholesale investors, as it shifts much of the burden of risk of investing to the client, who are trusted to make their own decisions. In addition, it reduces compliance obligations for the advisor. Sophisticated investors require no statements of advice or annual reviews and they can be offered products which are more complex to understand.

Crucially, the significant rises in both property and stock prices over the past 10 years suggests the time has come for the qualifying numbers for sophisticated investor status to be dramatically scaled up.

Property prices in many parts of the country have doubled in the past 10 years. The median house price in Sydney is now more than $1.3 million, and the average of all residential dwellings in Australia is $835,000.

During the same period the stock market has had a big run, leading to huge increases in paper wealth. The All Ordinaries Index has risen from around 4,300 on 1 October 2011 to 7,700 now, an increase of almost 80%. During this time investors have been receiving dividends, increasing their wealth still further.

More Australian investors have satisfied the numbers side (assets and/or income) of the sophisticated investor definition, but it is clear that many are not really ‘sophisticated’ in any sense of the word. They have not accumulated any greater knowledge of investing or capital markets. Inflation and a rising stock market simply does not make an investor ‘sophisticated’.

Many others have inherited money or invested in a stock many years ago that has made spectacular gains, such as CSL or the Commonwealth Bank. Some have sold houses that they owned for many years or divested an investment property.

Adviser responsibilities

Importantly, an adviser’s duty of care is towards the client. If a savvy daughter brings in her mother who has significant assets, then the mother is the client. It is the mother who must understand the advice that she is given. A simple discussion with the mother will enable an adviser to determine if she is ‘sophisticated’ far more than a certificate from the family accountant.

We often ask a client to repeat back to us what we have suggested or to explain the significance of certain advice.

But many advisers don’t take seriously enough their responsibility to properly assess if an investor truly is ‘sophisticated’ and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) doesn’t have the resources to check. Accountants tend to pass the buck as rarely will an accountant refuse a client a certificate confirming their sophisticated investor status.

It’s time to review the area. The criteria is strictly financial and it has not been changed for more than a decade. It has left the system open for abuse and the people who pay the price are everyday investors who may suffer dearly if the classification leaves them with less protection. The government can make a big start by raising the qualifying threshold for sophisticated investors in the Corporations Act and index them for the future.

 

Rodney Horin is CEO of wealth manager and aged-care advisor Joseph Palmer & Sons. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

7 Comments
Chris
October 27, 2021

Bernie Madoff's clients were apparently "sophisticated investors". If you need someone to stroke your ego to tell you how special you are because of what you earn or have (or don't), then maybe it's you that has issues ?

Stella
October 21, 2021

It's really frustrating for those who lose their wholesale status by virtue of retiring. We are no less sophisticated than we were (in fact our skill has grown with our experience), but we are now deprived of access to a whole range of investments that we once selected from. It makes much harder to generate a decent return.

Richard Rouse
October 21, 2021

I agree with Peter. The value of your home is irrelevant in the case of investing, it can hardly be classed as a liquid asset. I understood that the idea of having to be classed as a sophisticated meant that you were unlikely to get yourself into a position where you were likely to lose your home because you had sufficient assets outside of that, as well as enough experience as a successful investor. I agree that the threshold should be raised to protect those unsophisticated investors from themselves; and that there should be more controls over unqualified investment advisers.

Matt
October 21, 2021

The threshold hasn't been changed since its introduction. Index it by 10% per annum and the population may reduce particularly if backdated. A sophisticated investor should be able to achieve such a return over 5 years.

Jerome Lander
October 21, 2021

Unfortunately many retail investments are far inferior to wholesale alternatives. The average "retail" investor is precluded from accessing these better performing investments and hence precluded from moving ahead compared with a "wholesale" investor or client. In many cases, far from protecting these investors from losses, the red tape actually prevents them from achieving substantial gains and better risk adjusted returns. One of the greatest revelations I had - and I work and have worked in both worlds - was that those who could be wholesale investors were much better off; they were able to move away from the asset gathering relatively lower performing world of retail investing and retail advice to much higher performing alternatives.... For this reason, it is really sad to see so many advisers classifying their wholesale clients as retail for the sake of streamlining their business practice, hence precluding these clients from doing so much better with their money.

Peter
October 21, 2021

Back when I qualified as a sophisticated investor the definition of “investable assets” did not include the principle place of residence. Seemed logical, avoided issues of mortgage offset and the fact that your house is hardly an “investable” asset.
Why not return to this definition?

Stan
October 24, 2021

Peter's suggestion is spot on.The only decision ASIC then needs to make is the minimal size of the "investable" funds required and possibly index it.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

How are high net worths investing and thinking now?

100 tips from our readers for new investors

The Living Years Survey: Is this time different?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 433 with weekend update

There’s this story about a group of US Air Force generals in World War II who try to figure out ways to protect fighter bombers (and their crew) by examining the location of bullet holes on returning planes. Mapping the location of these holes, the generals quickly come to the conclusion that the areas with the most holes should be prioritised for additional armour.

  • 11 November 2021

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 431 with weekend update

House prices have risen at the fastest pace for 33 years, but what actually happened in 1988, and why is 2021 different? Here's a clue: the stockmarket crashed 50% between September and November 1987. Looking ahead, where did house prices head in the following years, 1989 to 1991?

  • 28 October 2021

Why has Australia slipped down the global super ranks?

Australia appears to be slipping from the pantheon of global superstar pension systems, with a recent report placing us sixth. A review of an earlier report, which had Australia in bronze position, points to some reasons why, and what might need to happen to regain our former glory.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Are these the four most-costly words in investing?

A surprisingly high percentage of respondents believe 'This Time is Different'. They may be in for a tough time if history repeats as we have seen plenty of asset bubbles before. Do we have new rules for investing?

Investment strategies

100 tips from our readers for new investors

From the hundreds of survey responses, here is a selection of 100 tips, with others to come next week. There are consistent and new themes based on decades of experience making mistakes and enjoying successes.

Strategy

What should the next generation's Australia look like?

An unwanted fiscal drain will fall on generations of Australians who have seen their incomes and wealth stagnate, having missed the property boom and entered the workforce during a period of flatlining real wages.

Shares

Bank results scorecard and the gold star awards

The forecasts were wrong. In COVID, banks were expected to face falling house prices, high unemployment and a lending downturn. In the recovery, which banks are awarded gold stars based on the better performance?

Exchange traded products

In the beginning, there were LICs. Where are they now?

While the competing structure, ETFs, has increased in size far quicker in recent years, LICs remain an important part of the listed trust sector. There are differences between Traditional and Trading LICs.

Shares

Should you bank on the Westpac buy-back?

Westpac has sent out details of its buy-back and readers have asked for an explanation. It is not beneficial for all investors and whether this one works for some depends on where the bank sets the final price.

Investment strategies

Understanding the benefits of rebalancing

Whether they know it or not, most investors use of version of a Strategic Asset Allocation (SAA) to create an efficient portfolio mix of different asset classes, but the benefits of rebalancing are often overlooked.

Shares

Six stocks positioned well for a solid but volatile recovery

The rotation to economic recovery favouring value stocks continues but risks loom on the horizon. What lessons can be drawn from reporting season and what are the trends as inflation appears in parts of business?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.