Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 159

What tax deductions are available to property investors?

When looking to purchase an investment property, there are many important questions. While most investors consider location, purchase price and tenanting ability, depreciation is often overlooked. Depreciation can help unlock the cash flow potential within an investment property, often resulting in thousands of additional dollars for the investor each financial year.

What is depreciation?

As a building gets older, items wear out – they depreciate. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) allows property owners to claim this depreciation as a tax deduction. Depreciation can be claimed by any property owner who obtains income from their property.

Claiming building structure as a deduction

Capital works allowance deductions are based on the historical cost of the building excluding the cost of all ‘plant’ and non-eligible items. As a general rule, residential buildings which commenced construction after 15 September 1987 and commercial properties which commenced construction after 20 July 1982 are eligible for the capital works allowance.

Although these restrictions apply, often older properties have undergone renovations. Renovations completed within the legislated dates can also entitle the owner of the investment property to deductions, even if the deductions were completed by a previous owner of the property.

Common depreciable items in an investment property

Plant and equipment items, commonly known as removable assets, are also eligible for depreciation deductions. Each plant and equipment item has an effective life set by the ATO. The depreciation deduction available on each item is calculated using the effective life. Some plant and equipment depreciable items commonly found within a property include:

  • Hot water systems
  • Ceiling fans
  • Dishwashers
  • Carpets
  • Blinds and curtains
  • Exhaust fans
  • Light shades
  • Ovens
  • Furniture
  • Range hoods
  • Smoke alarms
  • Garbage bins
  • Cook tops
  • Door closer

Case study

Amy purchased a nine-year-old three-bedroom house for $610,000 one year ago. Prior to making her depreciation claim, Amy’s investment property was earning a rental income of $495 per week or a total income of $25,740 per annum, while her yearly expenses (including loan interest) totalled $41,028. Towards the end of her first year owning the property, Amy’s annual after-tax outlay amounted to $9,631 or $185 per week, based on her 37% marginal tax rate. Of course, the reductions in taxable income are even more valuable to people in a higher tax bracket.

A thorough site inspection led to a detailed tax depreciation schedule showing the deductions available for her property for the next 40 years, including $9,585 in the first year. The following table provides a summary of Amy’s scenario for the first full year, both before and after depreciation was claimed.

The depreciation deductions in this case study were calculated using the diminishing value method of depreciation. The BMT Tax Depreciation Schedule reduced Amy’s annual outlay for the property to $6,085 per annum or $117 per week, a difference of $68 per week or $3,536 per year.

To claim depreciation, investors should obtain a comprehensive tax depreciation schedule from a Quantity Surveyor. They are qualified under the tax ruling 97/25 to estimate construction costs for depreciation purposes and are one of a few select professionals who specialise in providing depreciation schedules. They are affiliated with industry-regulating bodies and gain access to the latest information and resources through their accreditations.

Claiming depreciation during renovation

Existing assets within a property can be worth thousands of dollars. When old assets (like carpet or hot water systems) are replaced during a renovation, the owners may be entitled to claim any residual depreciation as a tax deduction. Property owners should consider a pre-renovation depreciation schedule if they are considering making any renovations to an investment property. They should also update an existing tax depreciation schedule after work is completed to ensure they capture deductions for any new items added to the property during the renovation.

 

Bradley Beer (B. Con. Mgt, AAIQS, MRICS) is the Chief Executive Officer of BMT Tax Depreciation, a leading provider of tax depreciation schedules for investors. This article is general information and individuals should seek their own tax advice.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Maximising your property tax depreciation and claims

EOFY and new depreciation rules for property

Tax deductions are still available for property investors

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.