Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 159

What tax deductions are available to property investors?

When looking to purchase an investment property, there are many important questions. While most investors consider location, purchase price and tenanting ability, depreciation is often overlooked. Depreciation can help unlock the cash flow potential within an investment property, often resulting in thousands of additional dollars for the investor each financial year.

What is depreciation?

As a building gets older, items wear out – they depreciate. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) allows property owners to claim this depreciation as a tax deduction. Depreciation can be claimed by any property owner who obtains income from their property.

Claiming building structure as a deduction

Capital works allowance deductions are based on the historical cost of the building excluding the cost of all ‘plant’ and non-eligible items. As a general rule, residential buildings which commenced construction after 15 September 1987 and commercial properties which commenced construction after 20 July 1982 are eligible for the capital works allowance.

Although these restrictions apply, often older properties have undergone renovations. Renovations completed within the legislated dates can also entitle the owner of the investment property to deductions, even if the deductions were completed by a previous owner of the property.

Common depreciable items in an investment property

Plant and equipment items, commonly known as removable assets, are also eligible for depreciation deductions. Each plant and equipment item has an effective life set by the ATO. The depreciation deduction available on each item is calculated using the effective life. Some plant and equipment depreciable items commonly found within a property include:

  • Hot water systems
  • Ceiling fans
  • Dishwashers
  • Carpets
  • Blinds and curtains
  • Exhaust fans
  • Light shades
  • Ovens
  • Furniture
  • Range hoods
  • Smoke alarms
  • Garbage bins
  • Cook tops
  • Door closer

Case study

Amy purchased a nine-year-old three-bedroom house for $610,000 one year ago. Prior to making her depreciation claim, Amy’s investment property was earning a rental income of $495 per week or a total income of $25,740 per annum, while her yearly expenses (including loan interest) totalled $41,028. Towards the end of her first year owning the property, Amy’s annual after-tax outlay amounted to $9,631 or $185 per week, based on her 37% marginal tax rate. Of course, the reductions in taxable income are even more valuable to people in a higher tax bracket.

A thorough site inspection led to a detailed tax depreciation schedule showing the deductions available for her property for the next 40 years, including $9,585 in the first year. The following table provides a summary of Amy’s scenario for the first full year, both before and after depreciation was claimed.

The depreciation deductions in this case study were calculated using the diminishing value method of depreciation. The BMT Tax Depreciation Schedule reduced Amy’s annual outlay for the property to $6,085 per annum or $117 per week, a difference of $68 per week or $3,536 per year.

To claim depreciation, investors should obtain a comprehensive tax depreciation schedule from a Quantity Surveyor. They are qualified under the tax ruling 97/25 to estimate construction costs for depreciation purposes and are one of a few select professionals who specialise in providing depreciation schedules. They are affiliated with industry-regulating bodies and gain access to the latest information and resources through their accreditations.

Claiming depreciation during renovation

Existing assets within a property can be worth thousands of dollars. When old assets (like carpet or hot water systems) are replaced during a renovation, the owners may be entitled to claim any residual depreciation as a tax deduction. Property owners should consider a pre-renovation depreciation schedule if they are considering making any renovations to an investment property. They should also update an existing tax depreciation schedule after work is completed to ensure they capture deductions for any new items added to the property during the renovation.

 

Bradley Beer (B. Con. Mgt, AAIQS, MRICS) is the Chief Executive Officer of BMT Tax Depreciation, a leading provider of tax depreciation schedules for investors. This article is general information and individuals should seek their own tax advice.

 

  •   7 June 2016
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Maximising your property tax depreciation and claims

EOFY and new depreciation rules for property

Tax deductions are still available for property investors

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.