Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 259

EOFY and new depreciation rules for property

In one of the most dramatic changes to property depreciation legislation in more than 15 years, Parliament passed the Treasury Laws Amendment (Housing Tax Integrity) Bill 2017 in 2017.

The legislation means owners of ‘second-hand’ residential properties (where contracts were exchanged after 7:30pm AEST on 9 May 2017) will be ineligible to claim depreciation on plant and equipment assets, such as air conditioning units, solar panels or carpet. It is an integrity measure which addresses concerns that some plant and equipment assets were being depreciated by successive property investors in excess of their actual value.

What’s unaffected by the new legislation?

The good news is that there are still thousands of dollars to be claimed by Australian property investors, as there has been no change to capital works deductions, a claim available for the structure of a building and fixed assets such as doors, basins, windows, or retaining walls.

The capital works deduction is available on residential investment properties that commenced construction after 15 September 1987. These deductions typically make up between 85-90% of an investor’s total claimable amount. This includes any capital works carried out by the current or a previous owner.

Existing depreciation legislation will be grandfathered. Investors can claim depreciation for plant and equipment assets that form part of a residential investment property purchased prior to 7:30pm on the 9 May 2017 (including contracts already entered into at that time). Investors who fall into this category can claim depreciation deductions until they either no longer own the asset, or until the asset reaches the end of its effective life.

Investors who purchase new residential properties and commercial property owners or tenants who use their property for the purposes of carrying on a business are also unaffected.

Superannuation funds that hold residential property (other than SMSFs) will not be affected, nor will public trusts and managed investment trusts or corporate tax entities.

Owners of second-hand properties who exchanged after 7:30pm on 9 May 2017 will still be able to claim depreciation for plant and equipment assets they purchase and directly incur an expense on.

Impact on new owners of second-hand residential property

A property owner will not be able to claim depreciation on pre-existing plant and equipment assets within properties which have been lived in as a primary place of residence where the owner decides to rent the property out after 1 July 2017. Plant and equipment assets within this scenario are considered previously used. Any additional work to such a property completed by the current owner is classified as capital improvements and claimed as normal. This includes both capital works and plant and equipment.

If a property is considered to have been substantially renovated by the previous owner for selling purposes, then an investor can claim depreciation on the new plant and equipment assets along with any new or old qualifying capital works deductions available. If an entity has previously been entitled to any depreciation deductions for these assets, or if someone lived in the property before it was held by the current owner, then they will not be able to claim any ongoing plant and equipment depreciation on the assets. These assets will be included in a capital loss depreciation schedule for the purposes of claiming a capital loss, allowing the owner to adjust their CGT liabilities where applicable.

It’s important to work with a specialist Quantity Surveyor to ensure that all deductions are identified and claimed correctly under the new legislation. For investors who are planning on selling a property affected by the new rules, a depreciation schedule can be provided to assist them and their accountant to perform a calculation adjustment for CGT liabilities.

More about the new depreciation legislation and how this applies to a range of property investment scenarios, is available in this document: Essential facts: 2017 Budget changes and property depreciation.

 

Bradley Beer is the Chief Executive Officer of BMT Tax Depreciation. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

  •   21 June 2018
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Maximising your property tax depreciation and claims

How property spruikers target SMSFs

Tax deductions are still available for property investors

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.