Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 259

EOFY and new depreciation rules for property

In one of the most dramatic changes to property depreciation legislation in more than 15 years, Parliament passed the Treasury Laws Amendment (Housing Tax Integrity) Bill 2017 in 2017.

The legislation means owners of ‘second-hand’ residential properties (where contracts were exchanged after 7:30pm AEST on 9 May 2017) will be ineligible to claim depreciation on plant and equipment assets, such as air conditioning units, solar panels or carpet. It is an integrity measure which addresses concerns that some plant and equipment assets were being depreciated by successive property investors in excess of their actual value.

What’s unaffected by the new legislation?

The good news is that there are still thousands of dollars to be claimed by Australian property investors, as there has been no change to capital works deductions, a claim available for the structure of a building and fixed assets such as doors, basins, windows, or retaining walls.

The capital works deduction is available on residential investment properties that commenced construction after 15 September 1987. These deductions typically make up between 85-90% of an investor’s total claimable amount. This includes any capital works carried out by the current or a previous owner.

Existing depreciation legislation will be grandfathered. Investors can claim depreciation for plant and equipment assets that form part of a residential investment property purchased prior to 7:30pm on the 9 May 2017 (including contracts already entered into at that time). Investors who fall into this category can claim depreciation deductions until they either no longer own the asset, or until the asset reaches the end of its effective life.

Investors who purchase new residential properties and commercial property owners or tenants who use their property for the purposes of carrying on a business are also unaffected.

Superannuation funds that hold residential property (other than SMSFs) will not be affected, nor will public trusts and managed investment trusts or corporate tax entities.

Owners of second-hand properties who exchanged after 7:30pm on 9 May 2017 will still be able to claim depreciation for plant and equipment assets they purchase and directly incur an expense on.

Impact on new owners of second-hand residential property

A property owner will not be able to claim depreciation on pre-existing plant and equipment assets within properties which have been lived in as a primary place of residence where the owner decides to rent the property out after 1 July 2017. Plant and equipment assets within this scenario are considered previously used. Any additional work to such a property completed by the current owner is classified as capital improvements and claimed as normal. This includes both capital works and plant and equipment.

If a property is considered to have been substantially renovated by the previous owner for selling purposes, then an investor can claim depreciation on the new plant and equipment assets along with any new or old qualifying capital works deductions available. If an entity has previously been entitled to any depreciation deductions for these assets, or if someone lived in the property before it was held by the current owner, then they will not be able to claim any ongoing plant and equipment depreciation on the assets. These assets will be included in a capital loss depreciation schedule for the purposes of claiming a capital loss, allowing the owner to adjust their CGT liabilities where applicable.

It’s important to work with a specialist Quantity Surveyor to ensure that all deductions are identified and claimed correctly under the new legislation. For investors who are planning on selling a property affected by the new rules, a depreciation schedule can be provided to assist them and their accountant to perform a calculation adjustment for CGT liabilities.

More about the new depreciation legislation and how this applies to a range of property investment scenarios, is available in this document: Essential facts: 2017 Budget changes and property depreciation.

 

Bradley Beer is the Chief Executive Officer of BMT Tax Depreciation. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

  •   21 June 2018
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Maximising your property tax depreciation and claims

How property spruikers target SMSFs

Tax deductions are still available for property investors

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.