Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 460

Why 'Don't fight the Fed' now has a different meaning

One of the defining events for global finance in 2022 happened during the Wall Street Journal Future of Everything Festival at which Fed Chair Jerome Powell spoke on 17 May and - finally! - got the message out. The world's most powerful central bank is now singularly focused on bringing inflation down towards 2% (from 8%-plus).

His admission this would not be possible without causing some pain, including the unemployment rate rising, would have rattled a few, but that was the explicit intention.

Relying on the 'Fed put' to save markets

For many years, investors have relied on the Federal Reserve to bail them out (the so-called 'Fed put') when markets showed their vulnerability and proved at risk of breaking down. With the 2020 experience still fresh in mind, many an investor the world around has become used to the fact that buying-the-dip is a simple but highly effective strategy.

Now the Fed is no longer aiming to prop up the economy through rising financial assets, and thus attitudes towards risk-taking and spending need to change. Across the USA, but preferably including the rest of the world too.

While inflation is stuck between ongoing Covid restrictions and supply-side disruptions and challenges, with the Russia-Ukraine war adding its own twist, the only way to tame inflation is by reducing demand. And in order to reduce demand, consumers need to become less comfortable with their financial situation and prospects.

Central banks have no control over global supply chains, but they wield enormous leverage over credit and financial assets. Bringing down asset values, and thus make consumers feel a lot less comfortable, seems but the most logical policy aim to pursue in 2022.

Risk is back in play

The exposure of US households to US equities has never been greater. Plus add a whole new generation of young 'investors' who don't genuinely know the practical implication of 'risk' and believe, with conviction, that owning cryptocurrencies and NFTs is the quickest route to becoming a billionaire before celebrating their 30th birthday.

In Australia, a similar observation can be made about a general perception that housing prices never fall, mate.

The Federal Reserve needs to change all of that in order to successfully rein in what it had mistakenly considered as a temporary, ‘transitory’ phenomenon throughout 2021. For the record: it is still possible inflation post-2020 might prove transitory on many accounts, but central bankers can no longer afford the luxury of sticking with a wait-and-see approach.

The risk of inflation becoming embedded is simply too high and would be many times over more damaging than the pain inflicted through an aggressive path of tightening. The Fed is all too aware of this. Note, for example, how Powell himself has recently started to include references to Paul Volcker, the central banker widely credited with slaying the inflation dragon in the early 1980s.

The Volcker Fed's aggressive tightening caused two economic recessions at the time, but it did pull down high inflation to manageable levels.

The message Powell has been trying to get across is that today's Fed is just as determined to put inflation back in its bottle. However, after more than a decade of explicit central bank support for financial assets in order to stave off structural deflation, most investors still have failed to comprehend the deeper meaning of the change in central bank messaging.

Redefining 'Don't fight the Fed'

We know what to do, and we know how to do it, Powell declared at the WSJ Festival, adding there should be no doubt, the Fed will do what is necessary.

"What we need to see is inflation coming down in a clear and convincing way, and we’re going to keep pushing until we see that" - those were his exact words.

Judging from price action since, it appears markets have finally understood the old saying of 'Don't Fight The Fed' now has a different meaning. The Fed wants less risk-taking, less confidence and less spending. Jobs will be lost. Asset prices will come down. But it's the pain that needs to happen, because inflation is a much, much bigger threat to everybody's wealth and future prospects.

Of course, it goes without saying, the Fed does have an ideal scenario in mind:

"What we need is to see really growth moving down from the very high levels that we saw last year, moving down to a level that’s still positive, but that will give the supply side a chance to catch up, and a chance for inflation to come down as we get supply and demand back together."

This sounds great, except for the fact that Powell also acknowledged the Fed does not control everything that impacts on the economy.

"There are many global events going on ... that are really not under our control as well."

But, and this was clearly the message Powell was pushing across, it won't deter this Federal Reserve from executing on what, simply put, needs to be done:

"We know how people are suffering from high inflation. And we have both the tools and the resolve to get inflation back down. And no one should doubt our resolve in doing that."

What Don't Fight The Fed in 2022 means for investing

The world of investing has shifted since 2021:

  • bond yields need to be higher, demand for credit needs to be tempered
  • asset prices, including equities and real estate, need to be lower
  • demand for products and services needs to be lower, which implies economic growth needs to be tempered.

Fighting inflation is now the main goal and everything else is of secondary importance, at best.

"What we need to see is clear and convincing evidence that inflation pressures are abating and inflation is coming down. And if we don’t see that, then we’ll have to consider moving more aggressively."

Let's all hope inflation is, indeed, transitory, and highly susceptible to slowing growth and rising interest rates. The alternative might prove devastating in a way only few among us are willing to contemplate.

But it also means bond yields may not have much further to rise from here, but the focus already is shifting to economic growth and corporate margins and profitability. Key question: how low?

 

Rudi Filapek-Vandyck is Editor at the FNArena newsletter, see www.fnarena.com. This article has been prepared for educational purposes and is not meant to be a substitute for tailored financial advice.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Bond opportunities in a higher rate world

Why have bond fund distributions been shrinking?

How much will rising inflation hit company valuations?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.