Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 105

Avoid the fast buck from fast food

We sit in the office of the Chief Executive of one of South East Asia’s leading business families, high above the bustling streets below. The group’s sprawling interests range from property development to a leading airline. But the jewel in the crown is an emerging, pan-regional snacks (fast food) business. We are invited to try some samples and we spend the next five minutes examining the various cake bars, potato chips and cookies on offer. None look especially appetising or close to healthy. As we turn over the packets in our hands, doing our best to discern ingredients, we recognise and find some nutritional information. Several ‘chocolate’ products do not appear to contain any cocoa. Slightly bemused, we raise this point with our host. He explains that the company finds it cheaper and easier to simply use vegetable fats as a substitute, and add more sugar to preserve a taste of sweetness.

Consequences of Asian incomes rising

As the disposable incomes of tens of millions of Asians rises, so does the demand for more variety and convenience in food. The sales by domestic companies serving local tastes as well as those of multinationals producing western fares have grown very quickly over the last 20 years. One consequence has been an increasingly rich universe of consumer staples companies available to investors in Asia.

However, it is clear that rising per capita income does not necessarily imply better nutrition. Much of Asia seems mid-way through a period of rapid growth in consumption of highly processed ingredients with high levels of salt, sugar and fat. Globalisation has ensured that the speed with which nutritionally poor quality food has become both available and affordable to large swathes of the urban population in emerging Asia has completely outstripped any education around sensible consumption.

The result is that large portions of the population in Asia are beginning to experience the types of non-communicable lifestyle diseases that are more often associated with older, richer and more developed western societies.

The prevalence of diabetes is now higher in Vietnam than in Japan and higher in Indonesia than Italy. Malaysia’s incidence of the disease ranks amongst the highest globally. Startlingly, rates in China and India are twice as high as in Australia, the UK or France. In countries with such large, in some cases ageing, populations and inadequate public health systems, it is no exaggeration to say that poor nutrition and the associated illnesses represents a potential health time bomb for the continent in the 21st century.

It is a tragic dichotomy that in the same Asia-Pacific region, far away from the bright lights of Hong Kong and Mumbai, live two-thirds of the world’s population of 800 million people who do not have enough food to simply live healthily. Malnutrition and stunting remains, despite the rapid economic progress of Asia over the last two decades, the norm for hundreds of millions of people in the region, primarily in rural areas in northern India, southwest China and the more remote parts of the Indonesian archipelago.

How sustainable is this?

It is within this extremely challenging and bewildering context that the team attempts to identify potential investee companies. As we meet companies around the region, we are constantly asking ourselves to consider the sustainability positioning of the businesses we meet. We set out to find those which are best positioned to contribute to and benefit from sustainable human development in the region over the next ten years.

In the area of food and beverages, that means trying to find companies that we think can continue to increase sales in a profitable way over the next ten years, governed by sensible management teams who will deliver reliable and steadily growing cash flows to shareholders. Often, this means seeking out those companies focused on increasing rural, bottom of the pyramid consumption and those products which are truly needed by the end-user.

We are trying to find companies whose products, by their nature, are well-positioned for future health and wellness trends. In countries around the world, the manufacturers of excessively unhealthy products are facing headwinds to earnings growth. This is coming on one hand from changing consumer preferences, reflecting a growing underlying awareness of health issues around sugar and salt consumption. At the same time, governments are throwing up barriers in the form of heavier regulation and special taxes in the knowledge that such products can create significant costs for society which will be borne through the public purse via future health spending.

These headwinds are relevant long-term investment points in Asia not 20 or 30 years from now, but today. Just as Asia has experienced an increase in these problems earlier and faster than the west did, the region may begin to address them at a pace that few currently expect. Consequently, we consider a rupee or baht of earnings from selling milk or oatmeal to be far lower risk than earnings from selling snacks made from vegetable fats and sugar. Investing in the former seems a far more sober and responsible way of preserving and growing clients’ capital over time in a low-risk manner.

 

Jack Nelson is an Investment Analyst at First State Stewart (part of Colonial First State Global Asset Management).

 

4 Comments
Jim Dennis
April 16, 2015

Surely the world population stated should be closer to 9 billion than 800 million.+

Graham Hand
April 16, 2015

Jim, that is just an estimate of the number of people who don't 'have enough food to simply live healthily', not the world's total population.

Chris P
April 16, 2015

I hope you're right, Jack. But do you really think governments in Asia will pass laws which prevent soft drinks and chips from becoming as popular as they are in the west (if they are not already)? We can't even pass those laws ourselves, and we know about the harmful effects of sugar and fat. And often, it is the sugary, fatty foods which are the cheapest, and these are poor people who need to eat.

Jack Nelson
April 20, 2015

Thanks Chris.
Some emerging markets have been more successful than developed countries in implementing these measures , which is in no small part because they suffer from these problems more severely. I'm thinking mainly of Mexico. Certainly in Asia the problem is real and the strain on public health systems will only intensify.
Perhaps (hopefully!) regulation will follow. The possibility that it will is a huge investment risk for these companies. As stockpickers doing our best to grow clients' wealth in the least risky way over the long term, we feel we're better off avoiding these weak franchises and instead backing a number of companies providing affordable, healthier options to Asia (they are out there!).

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.