Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 354

Bear markets are good for portfolio makeovers, not only bargains

Notching up record after record, financial markets are continuing to deliver unpleasant reminders of just how unprecedented the global pandemic crisis is. One recent record is the speed of the S&P/ASX 200 Index’s sudden slide to bear market status (defined as a 20% decline in pre-tax value from peak to trough). This slide took a mere 14 days in March, the quickest in the index’s history, easily eclipsing the next worst market slide of 55 days which signalled the onset of the GFC.

Source: Bloomberg, Parametric 31 March 2020. For illustrative purposes only. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Portfolio management in a crisis

A sophisticated approach to managing equities through this crisis period, as any large super fund will tell you, focuses on two things: first, avoid being a forced seller, and second, be well-positioned to take advantage of buying opportunities (which have been hard to find in recent years).

Despite fearmongering about the liquidity of large super funds in these extraordinary times, my conversations with super fund clients have been focused on the latter—tactical buying opportunities—not the risk of a debilitating run on funds and becoming a forced seller of equities. This suggests that, at least for these funds, liquidity is being well managed and will not be an issue.

Beyond the bargain-hunting opportunities for super funds (and other investors), there is a bigger opportunity available when bear markets hit—to give the whole equity portfolio itself a structural ‘makeover’.

As funds become larger and more sophisticated, they look to migrate their equity holdings from pooled investment funds housed in a legal trust structure (for example, ETFs and unlisted managed funds) across to separately managed accounts (discrete mandates) which give super funds direct ownership of the equities in their portfolios.

Pooled investment funds have their place as they are easy to use, ‘off-the-shelf’ ways to invest in equities. They shield the investor from much of the complexity and compliance burden of equity investing, which are instead borne by the product provider or pooled fund manager. But trends in the APRA-regulated super fund sector suggest funds are favouring more transparency, tax efficiency and customisation in equity investing.

The package of benefits that can be delivered in a separate account equity investment structure (with the right managers) but not through pooled funds includes:

  • specific ethical screens and values-driven investing
  • centralised portfolio management (CPM)
  • innovative fee structuring
  • tactical portfolio ‘tilting’
  • efficient transition management
  • after-tax investing
  • better assessment and management of portfolio risks, and
  • custom stakeholder reporting.

The window to restructuring a portfolio

Ironically, the strong returns on equities over the past decade (Australian, developed and emerging markets) have created a problem for super funds wanting to restructure their equity holdings—the capital gains tax liability they would incur in redeeming their investments from a pooled equity fund to seed a new separate account.

This kind of restructure can be done tax-free under US law, but not under Australian law, so beware literature from the US, which misleads Australian investors on this issue.

Consider a super fund wanting to transfer its $500 million equity portfolio from equity unit trust holdings into a separate account. The units have appreciated 25% since their acquisition, and 90% of the units are long-term holdings, with the remainder acquired in the past year. In isolation (and without tax-managing the transition), the fund faces a $10.5 million tax bill to restructure, or over 2% of portfolio value. While the restructure would deliver many benefits, the up-front tax bill is hard to swallow and a reason to delay the move and persist with what the fund believes is a sub-optimal structure.

Which brings us to the bear market conditions suddenly upon us. For super funds and others encumbered with ‘legacy’ investment structures and their embedded tax, now is an important window of opportunity for much more than just bargain-hunting—to re-cut the numbers to see just how much lower the tax cost of a move to their desired ‘future state’ for equity investing would be.

It is far more likely right now that the tax cost of a ‘portfolio makeover’ to move equities to a separate account structure would be immaterial or easily outweighed by the benefits. In our example above, the fund might even find that the current market value of its units in the equity trust has dipped below the original $400 million acquisition cost, which would actually deliver a windfall tax benefit if the fund seized the opportunity to restructure now.

While this ‘portfolio makeover’ opportunity represents a rare piece of good news for those navigating current market conditions, the cautionary lesson for super funds given the ASX bear market’s sudden, dramatic arrival is this: that predicting the market turnaround and speed and shape of the recovery (V-shape; U-shape; Nike ‘swoosh’?) will be fraught with difficulty.

The opportunity to not just find equity bargains, but migrate to a best-of-breed equity investment structure, is one to seize now, in case it vanishes just as fast.


Raewyn Williams is Managing Director of Research at Parametric Australia, a US-based investment adviser. This material is for general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any investor. Additional information is available at


April 24, 2020

I am a self funded retiree and I believe an intelligent individual. I understand the context of the article although I have had difficulty understanding a large amount of the terminology. As an example, "separate account equity investment structure", of the eight points I could relate (understand) two. The article has a number of similar statements. In my opinion the article could have been conveyed in much simpler terms.

Graham Hand
April 26, 2020

Hi David

We prefer to avoid articles which are too long, as readers are usually busy people. It is not always possible to explain concepts and terminology and some articles assume a level of knowledge. We have published over 3,000 articles and do not always repeat some earlier explanations.

For example, 'separately managed accounts' or similar have been covered a few times, such as:

Raewyn has also provided other articles, as you can see by looking her up under 'Contributors'.

April 23, 2020

I agree this is a time for a clear out, but with my personal portfolio, what is especially disappointing is that many LICs which have been hopeless for years are now at even worse discounts.

April 25, 2020

If LICs were forced to offer a buyback at NTA say annually, there would be no discounts for very long. Unfortunately, it's like trying to squeeze blood out of a stone to get them to do that kind of shareholder friendly action.


Leave a Comment:



A band-aid on a bullet wound

When is a share market sell-off really a crisis?

Four checks for a financial fire drill


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.