Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 317

Did your super do better than this in FY19?

Most Australians hold their superannuation in funds selected by their employer. Although the default process faces criticisms and members are generally disengaged, it produces excellent results.

For the first time ever, according to Chant West, institutional super funds delivered a 10th consecutive positive financial year return, with the median growth fund up 7% last financial year. Growth funds have a 61% to 80% allocation to growth assets, although there is some debate about the accuracy of this categorisation. The average return over 10 years has been a healthy 8.8% pa. The funds are unlikely to achieve anywhere near that level in the next decade.

No one way to produce the best results

Surprisingly, the top two funds over one year, QSuper and UniSuper, manage vastly different portfolios, and they are both in the top few over a more meaningful 10 years, as shown below. Chant West’s Senior Investment Manager, Mano Mohankumar, said:

“QSuper, like most not-for profit funds, has a meaningful allocation to unlisted assets such as property, infrastructure and private equity. However, where its strategy is unique is that it further smooths out returns for members by investing significantly less in listed shares than other funds. Against that, it maintains a significant allocation to long duration bonds which carry sharemarket-like risk but are a better diversifier against sharemarket falls than traditional bonds.

UniSuper, in contrast, has a strong focus on listed assets. Unlike most other not-for-profit funds, it has very little invested in unlisted assets. Instead, it prefers to gain its exposure to property and infrastructure by taking large stakes in high quality listed companies. UniSuper believes that taking this listed market route has enabled it to be opportunistic in building a portfolio of higher quality property and infrastructure assets at attractive prices.”

It is estimated that 93% of Unisuper’s assets are listed securities available to anybody. How did your portfolio perform relative to these large funds? (results are net of investment management fees).

Top 10 performing growth funds, one year to 30 June 2019 (%)

Source: Chant West, red line is survey median.

Top 10 performing growth funds, 10 years to 30 June 2019 (%)

Source: Chant West, red line is survey median.

The table below shows performance by fund category. While 2% makes a material difference in a superannuation balance over 15 years, the ‘All Growth’ fund long-term return of 7.8% is only 2% higher than the conservative fund, although the latter’s result is aided significantly by falling bond yields.

Diversified fund performance to 30 June 2019

Source: Chant West.

In the last 27 years, as shown below, growth funds have delivered negative returns in only three years including the two years of the GFC. The last decade has been wonderful for super fund members, and the long period of strong returns suggests growth rather than defensive is worthwhile over multi-decade investment horizons.

Source: Chant West.

Australian shares managed funds results

Turning to managed fund results as reported by Mercer, the table below compares the Top 10 in Australian shares (ranked according to their one-year results) out to 5 year performance. It is evidence that fund managers should not be judged on short-term numbers. For example, the top fund over one year, the Martin Currie Australian Real Income Fund, was 108th out of 142 over 3 months and 99th out of 121 over 3 years. But its 5 year number was also strong.

The table also shows:

  • In the last year, the median manager (up 9%) has significantly underperformed the S&P/ASX300 index (up 11.4%) but they were much closer over 5 years with the median at 9.5% and the index at 8.9%. However, the results are before management fees so the median manager would struggle to match the index.
  • Although a challenge for any investor, picking the top fund manager versus the bottom produces a major result difference. For example, the top fund over 5 years was Selector High Conviction Equity Fund at 19.2% while the bottom quartile delivered only 8.7%. With each quartile holding 26 managers in the 5 year numbers, that’s a lot of talented fund managers delivering poor long-term results.

 

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Cuffelinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

13 Comments
Warren
August 12, 2019

Karen, GESB aims to provide on its website all the information that a member needs to evaluate the range of investment options that are offered. GESB doesn’t subscribe to Chant West, so doesn’t appear in their performance tables.

Although the Board and Investment Committee (on which I sit) isn’t all that interested in short term peer comparisons, I can’t let Steve’s throwaway remark stand. “Modest” is a subjective term, so let me share some facts.

The GESB Super Growth Plan over 2018-19 year returned 7.5% after fees – which would place it above median, but just outside the top 10 in the chart. Over the 10 years the net return was 9.5% per annum, which would place GESB in the top 10.

As a member of GESB’s investment committee, I’m reasonably satisfied with those numbers, but not because they seem to line up well in an arbitrarily defined category in a table of several superfunds. Rather, it’s because they deliver solidly against the return objectives that we indicate to members we’re seeking to provide.

Returns data across the range of funds can be found here: https://www.gesb.wa.gov.au/members/investment-and-performance/performance/investment-returns/gesb-super

Geoff
August 10, 2019

Why did the CFS Wholesale Diversified fund not make the list? Their website is showing a return of 8.71% for the 12 months to June.

Hamish
August 04, 2019

Thanks for your article. Can you please elaborate on your comment in the second paragraph… “The funds are unlikely to achieve anywhere near that level in the next decade.”
Thanks

Graham Hand
August 04, 2019

Hi Hamish, a few points. Average returns for the last 10 years for ‘growth’ funds with 61 to 80% allocated to growth assets:

1. The bond allocation has done well with falling interest rates. With cash at 1% and 10 year bonds at 1.25%, how much further can they fall to generate capital gains (or income).

2. Equity markets at all-time highs a decade after the 2008-2008 GFC.

3. Valuations are high and while these levels do not tell you when the market will fall, they do indicate future returns will be lower.

I’d say 5% over the next decade will be a good result.

raymond
August 04, 2019

just to answer the question in the headline: yes. My SMSF increased 14% last financial year and 17% the year before. And that’s after brokerage, auditing, life insurance and all the other unnecessary costs that we are burdened with.

SB
August 04, 2019

Yes, mine is invested in only aust shares and cash and returned 66% in FY19.

Bill
August 04, 2019

Interesting how some of these ‘balanced’ industry funds hold up to 70-80% growth assets.

I wonder if members are aware of the higher underlying risks contrary to what the ‘balanced’ option implies?…. ‘Only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked.’

Joel
August 04, 2019

Some of the funds in the top 10 hold 90% growth assets, but this is depends on your definition of “growth”. Let’s just say that to call them “defensive” instead might be misleading.

Graeme B
August 04, 2019

Not a lot of us who didn’t beat the market are going to respond I suppose. It is probably vulgar to talk money but if I can shout or whisper I believe I did. Admittedly by taking a higher level of risk than the fundies could get away with.

Joel
August 04, 2019

What I find interesting is that all of the funds in these “best of” league tables still underperform the growth (i.e. 70%) multi-sector index! This is despite them having more than 70% growth as well (QSuper possibly excepted) over these periods. Even if you take a multi-sector index fund which is net of fees (which are low), there is still underperformance.

Everyone is battling it out to second best. It will be interesting to see if indexing continues to outperform over the next 10 years.

karen staniforth
August 04, 2019

Why do we never see performance figures for GESB Weststate/GESB Superannuation products? I would like to know how GESB is rated amongst other Superannuation Funds. Thankyou

Steve
August 04, 2019

You can find their results at their website (if you look right now). You will discover that their returns were modest for the past 12 months.

Steve
August 04, 2019

It is interesting to note that all of those fund members who rolled all of their super funds into HostPlus last year, simply because financial journalists & book authors sang their praises as Super fund of the year, only to discover that HostPlus didn’t even make it into the Top 10 funds for 2019.

Of course, no Statements of Advice were supplied to these fund members explaining why it was in their best interest to do so. It’s a good business selling books to the masses.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Is this really the best way to remove the super underperformers?

Meeting the retirement outcome challenge

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

30 years on, five charts show SMSF progress

On 1 July 1992, the Superannuation Guarantee created mandatory 3% contributions into super for employees. SMSFs were an after-thought but they are now the second-largest segment. How have they changed?

Investment strategies

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Taxation

Tips and traps: a final check for your tax return this year

The end of the 2022 financial year is fast approaching and there are choices available to ensure you pay the right amount of tax. Watch for some pandemic-related changes worth understanding.

Financial planning

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Infrastructure

Listed infrastructure: finding a port in a storm of rising prices

Given the current environment it’s easy to wonder if there are any safe ports in the investment storm. Investments in infrastructure assets show their worth in such times.

Financial planning

Power of attorney: six things you need to know

Whether you are appointing an attorney or have been appointed as an attorney, the full extent of this legal framework should be understood as more people will need to act in this capacity in future.

Interest rates

Rising interest rates and the impact on banks

One of the major questions confronting investors is the portfolio weighting towards Australian banks in an environment of rising rates. Do the recent price falls represent value or are too many bad debts coming?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.