Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 205

Bitcoin and lessons from speculative bubbles

The media over the years have had a deep fascination with bubbles, but what exactly are they? Is there any way of knowing if we are in a bubble and what should we do if we are?

The 'Bitcoin bubble'

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are currently in the midst of a massive speculative bubble. The market value of Bitcoin has tripled from the start of the year while other cryptocurrencies are rallying strongly.

But how should we think about bubbles more generally? And more importantly, what should we do if we find ourselves in one?

Bubbles should be viewed as part of a boom-bust cycle

Rather than examining bubbles in isolation, they should be viewed in the wider context of cycles and the inevitable booms and busts that have played out repeatedly in history. A bubble is just another phase in this cycle.

Bubbles often begin with some element of truth. In the tech boom, a common belief was that ‘internet will change the world’. While the early stages of the boom-bust cycle is evidenced by ‘smart money’ making profits, the later and more exciting ‘bubble’ phase is characterised by a sharp rally fuelled by extreme greed. Fundamentals and valuations no longer matter and ‘this time it’s different’.


Bubbles are about psychology not economics

When the powerful emotions of greed and fear are driving markets, we should exercise extreme caution. In the short-run, economics and fundamentals are out the window. Economic theory would predict that as prices rice, demand should fall. While this is true in many settings, this is not necessarily so in financial markets. People should like something less when its price rises, but in investing, they like it more. Why does this happen?

Traditional finance does not have a good answer. Instead, we should take a more behavioural perspective. At the heart of every speculative bubble is ‘bubble mentality’, a combination of greed and fear driving the actions of market participants. If the actions of market participants are no longer driven by logic and considered thought, it is no surprise that market prices deviate substantially from intrinsic value.

Bubbles are exciting. Our adrenaline is pumping. We are feeling greedy. As humans, we are fundamentally wired to have a ‘fear of missing out’. If a price of an asset rises sharply and we see those around us profiting, we want a piece of the action. Knowing full well we are in the midst of a bubble, we begin to convince ourselves that investing a small amount wouldn’t hurt.

This is contrary to fundamental logic: as prices rise, the less the future expected return. It is when we catch ourselves in this aforementioned process of irrational self-rationalisation when we should exercise the most caution.

Bubbles induce excessive risk-taking

What started out as a small ‘investment’ can quickly turn into betting the whole ranch. Ordinary investors get excited by the initial returns, they become inclined to bet more until they become heavily overleveraged. This is important. Market participants begin to take undue risks, focussing on the risk of the ‘missed opportunity’ rather than the risk of the investment itself. But there is a second important implication. The speculative game is addictive.

This is why informed investors avoid bubbles entirely. Crowded trades can be dangerous. Consensus is fallible. When we follow consensus, we become average by definition. As Buffett notes, “the less prudence with which others conduct their affairs, the greater the prudence with which we should conduct our own.” This is not simply an exercise in philosophy or ideology, this is a fundamental pillar of sustainable, long-term investing.

What should you do if you find yourself in a bubble?

Avoid them entirely. Ordinary investors think about the opportunities during a bubble, informed investors think about the opportunities after a bubble. As prices reach a point where they can no longer increase, the inevitable crash occurs. Initial denial by market participants turns into fear, which culminates in despair. At this point, informed investors who have avoided the crash entirely have the luxury of purchasing assets at distressed levels. Never be a forced seller. It is only by resisting the temptation of ‘easy money’ that informed investors are in a position of sufficient liquidity to fund large purchases.

A final word on Bitcoin

Bitcoin is similar to a long call option. There is limited downside - the most you can lose is your initial investment - with seemingly unlimited upside. However, 90% of options expire worthless and Bitcoin is no exception. With volatility fluctuating between 40% and 80% per annum, Bitcoin is not for the faint-hearted investor.

I would feel comfortable with Bitcoin valuations only if there is sound proof that it is used for transactions and especially that central banks are comfortable having a parallel currency. As long as this does not happen, Bitcoin is in a traditional bubble: an asset whose value is solely determined by what people are willing to pay for it in the future.


Wilbur Li is a final year student studying Bachelor of Commerce (Honours in Finance) at the University of Melbourne and is a Portfolio Manager with Sharewell. He has worked at Unisuper (global equities) and PwC (debt and fixed income). This article is general information that does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

April 29, 2021

Well, this hasn't aged well at all "traditional bubble: an asset whose value is solely determined by what people are willing to pay for it in the future." BTC/AUD $70K.

It's the fastest horse in the race for last decade. Its limited supply means that it is beyond the reach of reserve banks (ie infinite money supply). Looking around: money 95%+ of it is digital already, same for music, films, games et al. Even if investors consider having 1% exposure to cryptos, (not necessarily BTC) it may well be the best exposure in the fulness of time - in terms of returns. Looking at negative interest rates at moment on offer, frothy stock valuations, cryptos are looking like a safe heaven to this pleb

June 11, 2017

Agree wholeheartedly. However, one assumption made in this article is that it assumes equal levels of awareness, understanding, and attention between the stock market and the cryptocurrency markets.

Almost every adult in the world has some, however rudimentary, knowledge of the stock market. The same cannot be said regarding cryptocurrency, I would venture to say less than 1% of the global population even has the slightest clue as to what Bitcoin, Ethereum or blockchain technology is. However, this is changing and will change greatly over the coming years.

This bubble is based upon that aforementioned 1%. What happens when the other 99% catch up?

June 08, 2017

I can't help but think that the current NASDAQ and US S&P500 are at the "new paradigm" level, given that people such as Jeremy Grantham (who have traditionally been bearish) have stated "I’ve dedicated my life to financial bubbles, and I don’t think it is a bubble" and that "The US stock market has entered an era of higher valuations", as though it's the same "supercycle" and "stronger for longer" or that this time, it's different.

You'd think that they would know better, but it never is, and especially not at CAPE levels of 29x.

Warren Bird
June 08, 2017

The term 'bubble' is used in many inappropriate ways in relation to investments, but in this case it's entirely right. Where there is no actual underlying asset value, but people are willing to pay a lot for it, that's a bubble - prick it and it's gone.

It was appropriate with tulips in Holland in the 17th century, with a lot of dot com companies at the turn of the current century (about which I once gave a speech to clients asking 'how much would you pay for a zero coupon perpetual?) and may well be in relation to bitcoin, as has been well articulated in this article.

(Where bubble terminology should never be used is in relation to government and corporate bonds. They have a cash flow, including repayment of capital (face value) at maturity, that is in place no matter what the price does in the short term. They can become 'overvalued', but all that means is that you buy them at a low yield to maturity and you earn a low total return until it matures. There's no 'prick it and it's gone' situation.)


Leave a Comment:



10 quick points on Bitcoin, the wannabe that grew up

10 key takeaways on gold, Bitcoin and the Elon effect

Bitcoin as the new gold, or where I’ve seen this before


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.