Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 572

The bizarre government policy that led to Rex's downfall

Editor’s note: This is an edited transcript of an interview between the ABC Radio National’s Patricia Karvelas and Former ACCC Chair, Rod Sims, on August 1, 2024.

Patricia Karvelas: Next time you book a domestic flight, it's likely you'll have fewer options to choose from after Australia's third biggest airline, Rex flagged it will roll back its offerings. With a company in administration, others are pointing the finger at Qantas, accusing the company of anti-competitive behavior, something it has long denied. The federal government has defended its efforts to increase competition in the airline industry. Rod Sims is the former chair of the Australian competition regulator, the ACCC, and a Professor of Public Policy at the ANU, and our guest. Rod Sims, welcome.

Rod Sims: Good morning, PK.

Karvelas: Rex tried to shake up the Australian airline market by flying between Brisbane and Sydney and Melbourne. I think people living in those cities were pretty happy about that. Do you think they should continue to have a role doing that?

Sims: I think that the failure of Rex is obviously due to many things, but it's essentially a public policy failure. We certainly can have more than two airlines on these capital city routes, certainly on the Melbourne-Sydney route. But public policy is simply stopping that happening. And I don't know why, because if we had more airlines, if we had -- all evidence shows that when you have three airlines flying a route, the prices are much lower. It's just unquestionable that that's the case. So why the government doesn't change the policy levers to bring that about, I really do not understand.

Karvelas: Well, the government believes, and I've had many private conversations that actually you can only really sustain two airlines for that part of the market, the capital cities. Do you disagree?

Sims: Totally. I think that's just nonsense. Obviously, Qantas will say that because it's in their self-interest to do so. But all evidence from around the world is when you get routes which have this amount of traffic on them, you can sustain three players.

The problem, and this is the biggest public policy failure, is our slot allocation system. To fly the capital city routes, obviously the Sydney-Melbourne route, but the others as well, you have to get the scarce slots at Sydney Airport. Now, and I think this is unbelievable, but let me just lay it out. The government outsources the management of the slots at Sydney Airport to a company that's majority owned by Qantas and Virgin. I mean, it is just unbelievable. So, when Rex or indeed Bonza, who also wanted extra slots at Sydney Airport. When they want those key slots that they must have to be viable, they have to go and essentially ask for them from Qantas and Virgin. And of course, they've also got to put their business plans before them. So, the government sets this system up for failure. It sets this system up for a duopoly and therefore sets the system up for higher airline prices than Australians should be paying.

Karvelas: The Federal Transport Minister Catherine King says Australia is a small market and this is an industry with high costs. They've also talked about the internal issues at Rex. Some of that is absolutely true, right? They got lots of money during the pandemic. They also have had their internal issues on the board. Are they not responsible for their own problems?

Sims: You can always assess responsibility in various ways. The point I make is that it's necessary -- we won't get the competition until we reform the slots. If we reform the slots, we will get the competition. Now, quite what that meant for Rex, I don't know. What I do know is that Rex, and I have to say Bonza as well, were constantly tapping on my door complaining about the fact that they could not get the slots they needed. Now, should they have anticipated that the system was so rigged against them that they were doomed to fail? Well, you can argue they should. But let's identify the real public policy issue here. It is that you cannot have Qantas and Virgin controlling slots at Sydney Airport. That cements the duopoly and cements higher prices for Australians. We have to fix that. You can't say this is a natural duopoly when you've got this situation occurring.

Karvelas: The federal government says it's getting on with this legislation that will stop this slot hoarding. Do you give them credit for that? Are they doing that already?

Sims: I don't give them credit for it, frankly. They've had the report from Peter Harris, the ex-chair of the Productivity Commission for around about three years, admittedly so did the Coalition government. There's been no response to the Harris report. I mean, no response. Why is that would have actually, I think, fixed this problem? So, when you sit on a report for three years, well, in this government's case, two years, and it's not just sitting on that report. You've got a system where Qantas and Virgin control the management of slots at Sydney Airport. I mean, you just cannot let that continue. You should stop it immediately. And I don't think they've done that.

Karvelas: The Treasurer says their priority is essentially intervening in the regional space because they don't want the airline to fail for the regions. Is that good enough?

Sims: Look, we need Rex flying to the regions. There's no doubt about that. If you're in a regional town, many of those regional routes are natural monopolies. That is, you can really only have one airline coming in and out of them. Traditionally, in many of those routes, not all of them, but in many of them, that's been Rex. And those cities, those country towns need that service. So, I certainly agree that from an Australian perspective, the highest priority is getting the regional routes restored. But I don't think far behind is the idea that we need real competition. And we need to see whether it can happen. My point and my frustration is we're actually stopping it happening. To talk about whether it can or can't happen, when you're actually doing, the government is doing something to stop it happen, is really what is making me, yes, a little bit angry.

This is an edited transcript of an interview between the ABC Radio National’s Patricia Karvelas and Former ACCC Chair, Rod Sims, on August 1, 2024.

 

  •   7 August 2024
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Three key attributes of great companies

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.