Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 572

The bizarre government policy that led to Rex's downfall

Editor’s note: This is an edited transcript of an interview between the ABC Radio National’s Patricia Karvelas and Former ACCC Chair, Rod Sims, on August 1, 2024.

Patricia Karvelas: Next time you book a domestic flight, it's likely you'll have fewer options to choose from after Australia's third biggest airline, Rex flagged it will roll back its offerings. With a company in administration, others are pointing the finger at Qantas, accusing the company of anti-competitive behavior, something it has long denied. The federal government has defended its efforts to increase competition in the airline industry. Rod Sims is the former chair of the Australian competition regulator, the ACCC, and a Professor of Public Policy at the ANU, and our guest. Rod Sims, welcome.

Rod Sims: Good morning, PK.

Karvelas: Rex tried to shake up the Australian airline market by flying between Brisbane and Sydney and Melbourne. I think people living in those cities were pretty happy about that. Do you think they should continue to have a role doing that?

Sims: I think that the failure of Rex is obviously due to many things, but it's essentially a public policy failure. We certainly can have more than two airlines on these capital city routes, certainly on the Melbourne-Sydney route. But public policy is simply stopping that happening. And I don't know why, because if we had more airlines, if we had -- all evidence shows that when you have three airlines flying a route, the prices are much lower. It's just unquestionable that that's the case. So why the government doesn't change the policy levers to bring that about, I really do not understand.

Karvelas: Well, the government believes, and I've had many private conversations that actually you can only really sustain two airlines for that part of the market, the capital cities. Do you disagree?

Sims: Totally. I think that's just nonsense. Obviously, Qantas will say that because it's in their self-interest to do so. But all evidence from around the world is when you get routes which have this amount of traffic on them, you can sustain three players.

The problem, and this is the biggest public policy failure, is our slot allocation system. To fly the capital city routes, obviously the Sydney-Melbourne route, but the others as well, you have to get the scarce slots at Sydney Airport. Now, and I think this is unbelievable, but let me just lay it out. The government outsources the management of the slots at Sydney Airport to a company that's majority owned by Qantas and Virgin. I mean, it is just unbelievable. So, when Rex or indeed Bonza, who also wanted extra slots at Sydney Airport. When they want those key slots that they must have to be viable, they have to go and essentially ask for them from Qantas and Virgin. And of course, they've also got to put their business plans before them. So, the government sets this system up for failure. It sets this system up for a duopoly and therefore sets the system up for higher airline prices than Australians should be paying.

Karvelas: The Federal Transport Minister Catherine King says Australia is a small market and this is an industry with high costs. They've also talked about the internal issues at Rex. Some of that is absolutely true, right? They got lots of money during the pandemic. They also have had their internal issues on the board. Are they not responsible for their own problems?

Sims: You can always assess responsibility in various ways. The point I make is that it's necessary -- we won't get the competition until we reform the slots. If we reform the slots, we will get the competition. Now, quite what that meant for Rex, I don't know. What I do know is that Rex, and I have to say Bonza as well, were constantly tapping on my door complaining about the fact that they could not get the slots they needed. Now, should they have anticipated that the system was so rigged against them that they were doomed to fail? Well, you can argue they should. But let's identify the real public policy issue here. It is that you cannot have Qantas and Virgin controlling slots at Sydney Airport. That cements the duopoly and cements higher prices for Australians. We have to fix that. You can't say this is a natural duopoly when you've got this situation occurring.

Karvelas: The federal government says it's getting on with this legislation that will stop this slot hoarding. Do you give them credit for that? Are they doing that already?

Sims: I don't give them credit for it, frankly. They've had the report from Peter Harris, the ex-chair of the Productivity Commission for around about three years, admittedly so did the Coalition government. There's been no response to the Harris report. I mean, no response. Why is that would have actually, I think, fixed this problem? So, when you sit on a report for three years, well, in this government's case, two years, and it's not just sitting on that report. You've got a system where Qantas and Virgin control the management of slots at Sydney Airport. I mean, you just cannot let that continue. You should stop it immediately. And I don't think they've done that.

Karvelas: The Treasurer says their priority is essentially intervening in the regional space because they don't want the airline to fail for the regions. Is that good enough?

Sims: Look, we need Rex flying to the regions. There's no doubt about that. If you're in a regional town, many of those regional routes are natural monopolies. That is, you can really only have one airline coming in and out of them. Traditionally, in many of those routes, not all of them, but in many of them, that's been Rex. And those cities, those country towns need that service. So, I certainly agree that from an Australian perspective, the highest priority is getting the regional routes restored. But I don't think far behind is the idea that we need real competition. And we need to see whether it can happen. My point and my frustration is we're actually stopping it happening. To talk about whether it can or can't happen, when you're actually doing, the government is doing something to stop it happen, is really what is making me, yes, a little bit angry.

This is an edited transcript of an interview between the ABC Radio National’s Patricia Karvelas and Former ACCC Chair, Rod Sims, on August 1, 2024.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Three key attributes of great companies

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Maybe it’s time to consider taxing the family home

Australia could unlock smarter investment and greater equity by reforming housing tax concessions. Rethinking exemptions on the family home could benefit most Australians, especially renters and owners of modest homes.

Supercharging the ‘4% rule’ to ensure a richer retirement

The creator of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals, Bill Bengen, has written a new book outlining fresh strategies to outlive your money, including holding fewer stocks in early retirement before increasing allocations.

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Why we should follow Canada and cut migration

An explosion in low-skilled migration to Australia has depressed wages, killed productivity, and cut rental vacancy rates to near decades-lows. It’s time both sides of politics addressed the issue.

Are franking credits worth pursuing?

Are franking credits factored into share prices? The data suggests they're probably not, and there are certain types of stocks that offer higher franking credits as well as the prospect for higher returns.

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Latest Updates

A nation of landlords and fund managers

Super and housing dwarf every other asset class in Australia, and they’ve both become too big to fail. Can they continue to grow at current rates, and if so, what are the implications for the economy, work and markets?

Economy

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Retirement

Retiring debt-free may not be the best strategy

Retiring with debt may have advantages. Maintaining a mortgage on the family home can provide a line of credit in retirement for flexibility, extra income, and a DIY reverse mortgage strategy.

Shares

Why the ASX is losing Its best companies

The ASX is shrinking not by accident, but by design. A governance model that rewards detachment over ownership is driving capital into private hands and weakening public markets.

Investment strategies

3 reasons the party in big tech stocks may be over

The AI boom has sparked investor euphoria, but under the surface, US big tech is showing cracks - slowing growth, surging capex, and fading dominance signal it's time to question conventional tech optimism.

Investment strategies

Resilience is the new alpha

Trade is now a strategic weapon, reshaping the investment landscape. In this environment, resilient companies - those capable of absorbing shocks and defending margins - are best positioned to outperform.

Shares

The DNA of long-term compounding machines

The next generation of wealth creation is likely to emerge from founder influenced firms that combine scalable models with long-term alignment. Four signs can alert investors to these companies before the crowds.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.