Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 183

So bond rates are not 'lower for longer'

For most of 2016, we have warned investors about the dangers of accepting historically low bond rates as the 'new normal'. The reality is that US 10-year rates lower than at any time since George Washington was sworn in as the first President of the United States is anything but normal.

Indeed, it is abnormal. In June this year, US 10-year rates plumbed 1.36%, lower than they were during the Great Depression, when unemployment hit 25%. Such low rates were not justified on economic grounds and therefore were evidence of central bank manipulation. In fact, we have a name for central bank manipulation of long bond rates, it’s called quantitative easing.

Manipulation actually hurts consumption

As economist Herb Stein once wryly observed, if something cannot go on forever, it must stop. And there's another reason why long bond rates cannot not stay low forever. They are having the perversely opposite impact of what was desired. Denmark’s interest rates have been negative for a relatively longer period, stimulating saving and acting as a disincentive for consumption; yes, savings as a percentage of GDP are up and consumption is down, which is precisely the opposite of what central banks had hoped to achieve.

Low bond rates and the corresponding flat yield curves create disincentives for investment, so why take long-term risk when the returns over the short term are the same? Bond rates are the rate against which all investments are compared through the cost of capital calculation. Therefore, low bond rates transmitted higher valuations across all asset classes, ensuring buyers paid higher prices and received correspondingly lower returns.

Companies were then forced to hand back their capital through dividends and buybacks rather than invest productively. This can be seen in the rising dividend payout ratios in Europe, the US and Australia since 2010. In Australia, the payout ratio for the S&P/ASX200 rose from 57% in 2010 to over 80% today. For the Stoxx 600 index in Europe, the payout ratio rose from 43% to nearly 60% and in the US, the S&P500's payout ratio increased from nearly 26% in 2011 to almost 40% now.

Of course, the corollary to higher payout ratios is lower retained earnings for future growth. At precisely the moment when share prices were at their highest, growth expectations were at their lowest.

Record prices for everything

The only thing low bond rates have achieved is record asset prices. Indeed, since 2012, P/E ratios for Australian stocks increased, and according to the RBA, the highest P/E ratios were attributed to those companies in the ASX200 paying more than 75% of their earnings as a dividend. Real estate, art, wine and collectible low digit licence plates have been smashing records.

A quick look through the sharemarket reveals that infrastructure stocks like Transurban and Sydney International Airport became two of the most expensive companies listed on an EV/EBITDA basis. One has to ask why Sydney International Airport, which geographically can be described as being located on a vacant block at the end of a global cul-de-sac, deserves to be the most expensive listed airport in the world?

So commentators and prognosticators who projected low bond rates forever as part of a ‘new normal’ were in fact unwittingly admitting ‘this time it’s different’.

History, however, shows that this time is never different. Bond rates will rise, in fact they already have. The 10-year Australian bond has risen from a low of about 1.8% in August 2016 to 2.7% while the US counterpart has risen from 1.36% mid-year to over 2.2%.

Bond rates will continue to rise over time because it does the world no good to keep them low. This will not be good for asset prices. Highly geared property investors will feel the full brunt of rising bond rates and those property developers under 40 will wither from the BRW Rich List as quickly as they were germinated.

As higher rates reduce the present values of future cash flows, so investors will devalue assets as well as the multiples they are willing to pay. When bond rates rise, the ‘P’ in the P/E ratio falls. And with payout ratios so high, the ‘E’ in the P/E ratio isn’t providing the growth needed to compensate. Expect to one day look back on this period of low rates, and highly indebted investors paying record high asset prices, with astonishment.

Huge plus for global economic health, eventually

While higher bond rates will be painful for investors over the next three to eight years, it is actually an enormous positive for global economic health and investor returns. Higher bond rates mean higher returns. Before that can happen, however, there will be a much-needed adjustment.

Then come the positives. New investments will be required to meet a real return hurdle to attract funding and the total pool of capital available for investment and future growth will cease diminishing (through higher payout ratios, for example), and begin to grow. Speculative bubbles will burst, transferring wealth from speculators with no patience to long-term investors with patient capital.

Those countries, corporates and consumers with the highest debt will be hit hardest, as they always are. But the much-needed adjustments will be a net positive and very aggressive buying will be the order of the day by the early-to-mid 2020s.

 

Roger Montgomery is the Founder and Chief Investment Officer at The Montgomery Fund, and author of the bestseller 'Value.able'. This article is general education and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Social media’s impact is changing markets

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.