Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 403

Do bonds still offer a buffer to equity volatility?

The relationship between bonds and equities is a feature of all balanced portfolios, especially how the price of one moves in relation to the other. Correlation is a measure of the strength of the co-movement, with a positive correlation indicating prices usually move in the same direction.

As this relationship drives the performance of superannuation for many Australians, it’s useful to know how the correlation between bonds and equities has varied over longer time periods. This article also looks at some of the key drivers of the correlation structure, and how different levels of correlation impact a portfolio’s performance.

Correlation between bonds and equities over longer time periods

Questioning the persistence of the negative correlation between equity and investment grade fixed income price returns (that is, when equities rise, bond prices fall and rates rise, or when equities fall, bond prices rise and rates fall) has become timely because of the intersection of a few topics.

In particular, co-movement of the equity and sovereign bond markets during the March 2020 market sell-off reignited the concern about the hedging potential offered by fixed income assets. This led to a reinvestigation of the sovereign bond-equity correlation relationship, a relationship that has been negative over the past two decades. Many argue that much of this negative correlation can be attributed to the lowering and persistently low levels of inflation over this same period.

While stock and government bond prices have been moving in opposite directions since the beginning of the new millennium, the correlation prior to around 1997 in the US, as seen below, was broadly positive for more than a century. Using data going back to the mid-19th century, the correlation between equities and bonds has been mostly positive, making the recent and consistent stretch of negative correlation the anomaly, rather than the rule. (EMA=Exponential Moving Average).

Long-term evidence of positive correlation between bonds and equities

How do different levels of correlation impact returns?

Investors use the Sharpe ratio as a measure of risk-adjusted returns, or how much excess return you receive for taking more risk. You would expect a higher return from an equity portfolio than a bond portfolio over time because equities are more volatile (and, by this measure, riskier).

The table below shows the Sharpe ratios of a 60/40 portfolio in three different time periods: 1980-today, 1980-1998 and 1998-today.

The latter two periods are characterised by the flip in correlation that occurred in 1997. In the first column of the table, we assume an arbitrary -0.4 correlation between equities and bonds and recalculate the Sharpe ratios. We repeat for the second column with an arbitrary +0.4 correlation.

What is striking is the increase in pre-1998 Sharpe ratio from 0.78 to 1.14 by flipping the correlation, and from 0.40 to 0.51 following the same flip in sign for the period post-1998. So the risk-adjusted returns of a 60/40 portfolio are very sensitive to the level of correlation between equities and bonds!

How have other ‘safe-haven’ assets performed in difficult markets?

Asset managers have become accustomed to being able to rush into the safest and most liquid of assets, typically US treasuries, as a hedge when equity markets sell-off.

The ‘protective’ property of so-called ‘safe-haven’ assets such as US treasuries (and other low risk sovereign debt, gold, and especially the currencies of the US, Japan, and Switzerland) has been called upon to hedge equity exposure in periods of high (and often continued) market stress and significant drawdowns.

However, this market feature, looking back over the past 60 years, has only recently been available to all investors. In the table below we show all equity drawdowns (market falls) greater than 10% since the 1960s. We tabulate the total return of the S&P 500 from peak to trough, along with the comparative total return of US treasuries along with other major safe-haven assets. There is a distinctive pattern, corresponding with the correlation structure of equities and bonds as discussed above.

Before the end of the 90s, bonds typically moved in lockstep with equities, offering no protection to investors during these, the most severe drawdowns. Even in the couple of cases it did, the returns were marginal. However, after the end of the 90s, the pattern changed markedly, when, in most cases, bonds acted as an effective hedge against the equity sell-off.

Our conclusions

Given these observations, both the return and hedging potential of bonds are reduced when interest rates are low and correlations are positive.

If bonds become a less effective hedge for portfolios, investors will be left with few choices other than an expensive portfolio of options. We think they would be better advised to look for alternatives to bonds for diversification in the current environment.

 

Craig Stanford is a Director of Capital Fund Management. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor. Any description or information involving investment process or allocations is provided for illustration purposes only. There can be no assurance that these statements are or will prove to be accurate or complete in any way. All figures are unaudited. This article does not constitute an offer or solicitation to subscribe for any security or interest.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

An insider's view of the last financial crisis

Red pill or blue pill? Navigating the matrix of fixed income

5 lessons from the GFC as panic whips hybrids

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Lessons when a fund manager of the year is down 25%

Every successful fund manager suffers periods of underperformance, and investors who jump from fund to fund chasing results are likely to do badly. Selecting a manager is a long-term decision but what else?

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

In almost 1,000 responses, our readers differ in voting intentions versus polling of the general population, but they have little doubt who will win and there is widespread disappointment with our politics.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Betting markets as election predictors

Believe it or not, betting agencies are in the business of making money, not predicting outcomes. Is there anything we can learn from the current odds on the election results?

Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 454 with weekend update

Before the last Federal election, these pages were filled with policy discussions and articles generating hundreds of comments as Labor ran a large target agenda. We all know how that ended. Most Australians distrust government and media, and this campaign will be handouts, spin and personality attacks. Will Australia emerge more divided than ever?

  • 14 April 2022

Latest Updates

In praise of our unique democracy and its sausage

For all the shortcomings of our political campaigns, our election process is the best. We are blessed with honest administrators and procedures that we all trust to hand over power peacefully, with a big snag. 

Investment strategies

Is the investing landscape really different this time?

Many market analysts argue that the pandemic has changed everything but we must judge whether the circumstances are as drastic as billed. A quick review of four major events helps decide if this time is different.

Economy

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Retirement

When will I retire? Economic impact of an ageing population

About 39% of the labour force is aged over 45. Intergenerational reports highlight the challenges of an ageing population and the impacts on consumption patterns, dependencies, public finances and economic growth.

The real story behind the crypto crash

The recent sell-off in the crypto market and its trigger - the collapse of the Terra UST coin - has affected many institutions either holding or trading crypto assets, including crypto fund managers.

Investment strategies

Cash is the nightingale, the bird in the hand

The bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, and it's an apt metaphor for investment choices. In 2021, as investors hunted in the bush for decent returns, demand overwhelmed supply. Cash is the bird in the hand.

Strategy

Book review of 'Putin’s People' and his motivation for war

Author Catherine Belton argues Putin’s sole ambition is to hold onto power. Her book seeks to understand why Putin invaded Ukraine after he became isolated and out of touch with reality during the pandemic.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.