Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 89

The case for active management in A-REITs

Amid the growing popularity of ASX-listed real estate investment trusts (A-REITs) as a way for investors to obtain exposure to real estate, there is a debate over whether investors should use an actively managed A-REIT securities fund, a passively managed index unlisted fund or an exchange traded fund (ETF).

What is active versus passive management?

Active management focuses on identifying securities that the market may have mispriced through analytical research and judgement to minimise exposure to riskier or overvalued securities. A passive index manager owns all the securities in the S&P/ASX 300 A-REIT Index even those A-REITs which may have poor management, lower quality assets or high gearing, or are overvalued on a relative basis.

The A-REIT sector

In the last five years, the A-REIT sector has recorded strong performance relative to the broader equities market (Figure 1), due largely to the low interest rate environment which has diverted capital from cash and bonds to higher yielding assets such as real estate. Not surprisingly, with the S&P/ASX 300 A-REIT Index generating such a strong return, the spotlight has turned back to active managers of A-REIT securities funds to justify their relevance.

Figure 1: Performance of A-REITs vs Australian Equities: 31 October 2014AH Chart1 211114

AH Chart1 211114

How can active managers add value?

An active A-REIT securities manager has a number of opportunities to add value to a portfolio, including:

  1. tactical allocation to real estate subsectors
  2. analysis and research on individual A-REITs
  3. building a more diversified portfolio based on value, and
  4. participating in securitisation opportunities.

1. Tactical allocation to real estate subsectors

Real estate is not a homogenous asset class in which real estate subsectors (office, retail, industrial, residential, social infrastructure) or individual securities generally move together. Each real estate subsector has its own supply and demand drivers, which can alter the duration and direction of its cycle, often resulting in significantly different returns (see Figure 2).

A specialist A-REIT manager who understands the relationships between economic drivers and the real estate cycle may acquire A-REITs in subsectors they believe are more attractively priced in the current market and conversely avoid or underweight subsectors that they believe are expensive or are likely to underperform. A passive manager must own A-REITs in every subsectors within the index.

Figure 2: A-REIT Subsector Performance to 31 October 2014 (Source: UBS)AH Chart2 211114


2. In-depth analysis and research of individual A-REITs

A specialist active management team has the ability to uncover relative value between A-REIT securities. Smaller cap A-REIT securities have the greatest potential to be mispriced by the market due to lower liquidity and less broker research coverage than the large cap A-REITs.

Within the A-REIT sector, there has also been a wide variation in the performance of individual securities, up to 196% in one month (Figure 3). The variation can be driven by the quality of management, specific issues relating to the underlying assets, the ability of management to grow earnings through accretive acquisitions or development and capital management strategies such as gearing levels, debt profiles and security buy-backs.

The growing presence of general equity and hedge funds in the A-REIT sector also creates short-term mispricing opportunities at the individual security level. For many of these investors, their rationale for investing in a security maybe very different to that of a A-REIT securities manager, often driven by their short-term investment horizon or an arbitrage trade around corporate activity. The recent Australand takeover by Frasers Centrepoint saw large inflows from hedge funds seeking to capture the spread between the price at the time of the announcement and the eventual price paid by the acquirer.

Figure 3: Highest and Lowest Monthly Total Returns from A-REITs – 2009 to 2014 (Source: UBS)AH Chart3 211114

3. Building a more diversified portfolio based on value

Most indices, including the S&P/ASX 300 A-REIT Index, are weighted based on market capitalisation resulting in a high concentration of larger companies within the Index. The top eight A-REIT securities account for approximately 82% of the index and the retail sector focused A-REITs account for nearly 50% of the Index.

Passive investment strategies face significant concentration risk and therefore are taking on more security specific risk. Diversification is one of the basic strategies for reducing risk. An active manager can mitigate the concentration risk by taking more meaningful positions away from the top eight securities by investing in smaller caps or A-REITs not included in the Index.

4. Participation in new issue opportunities

Advocates for passive management often argue that the corporate activity in the A-REIT sector results in a smaller number of securities for active managers to choose from. The number of A-REITs in the index has declined from 62 in June 2006 to 47 now. However, the recent increase in initial public offerings (IPOs) has added breadth to the A-REIT sector (Table 1). This in turn creates more opportunities for active managers.

Whilst the number of new A-REITs has been welcomed by active managers, it is the widening of the subsector offerings (other than the traditional retail, office and industrial) that provides the greatest opportunities through portfolio tilts to the various subsectors. Self-storage, health and agriculture are just three of the new sectors, albeit they are still small.

Table 1 - IPO activity 2013/2014AH Table1 211114

Active managers also have the opportunity to participate in the recapitalisation of an A-REIT through placement and rights issues. Whilst an index manager is forced to participate to maintain their relative exposure to A-REIT, an active manager has the opportunity to assess the merits of the transaction and act accordingly.


Active management of A-REITs securities has a role to play in either listed or unlisted funds, notwithstanding the higher fees charged by active funds. In choosing a manager, the skill and track record of an active A-REIT securities manager is paramount, and also their level of funds under management. Ultimately, their long-term success depends on how well the manager understands the dynamics of the listed real estate securities market, the interaction with the broader capital markets and real estate sector and whether the manager has a disciplined, risk-adjusted investment approach.


Adrian Harrington is Head of Funds Management at Folkestone Limited.

November 28, 2014

Reply to Graeme
I agree that there is generally always both a ‘for’ and ‘against’ argument, but the clear advantage a good active manager has is the ability to research, analyse individual A-REITs and its management as well as the economic environment and make appropriate investment decisions as to inclusion and weight in a portfolio. A high conviction manager who is prepared to back their research and take active positions in A-REIT securities well away from the index.

Capital Markets Guy
November 29, 2014

A Devil's Advocate View might run along these lines:

But fundamental investment research can be wrong, or be right and not reflected in prices. And portfolio management decisions can be wrong, or not result in out-performance. Plus active management fees tend to be a large part of the promised outperformance - and that is if returns are measured before fees and taxes.

I am not an advocate for market capitalization benchmarks, but given how loudly and how often active managers castigate people for investing in them, their overwhelming failure to beat them on a regular basis is a damning condemnation of the industry.

A more useful exercise for investors would be to ask: if I was to reject the market capitalization benchmark, what would be a better alternative way to assemble a long-term "default portfolio" in this asset class. Having done that, do I go to the trouble of trying to find a manager that says they can beat my default portfolio after fees and taxes.

This is not an easy thing to do - otherwise everyone would be doing it - but it does recognize that we often find it difficult to articulate exactly what it is we want from our portfolios and our managers.

November 27, 2014

I think this article should be titled, "What can active management of a A-REIT involve". All the points made 'for' active management can equally be made 'against' active management.

Can't argue with the conclusion ie. all depends on having a good manager. But we all know that applies to any investment category, or for that matter any business in any field.

November 21, 2014

Like any case for active management, this story sounds good in principle. In practice, though, substantially less than 50% of actively managed REIT funds have managed to beat a simple index over 5 year periods. This was true in recent good times:
And also in bad times:

Concentration and valuation issues can also be mitigated by moving away from a cap-weighted index (there are many ways to construct an index). For example, in Canada many of the popular REIT ETFs are equal-weighted. An equal-weighted top-20 or top-25 REIT index ETF would be viable in Australia.

November 28, 2014

Reply to David
Not all active management styles are created equal. There a lot of managers who call themselves active but due to the investment parameters or portfolio size (ie managing more than 1% of the index) essential just hug the index. Actively managed funds that do little more than replicate the index and charge ‘active’ management fees will undoubtedly underperform the index. Other active management approaches, such as benchmark unaware or high conviction, provide a better opportunity for outperforming the index over the medium to long term. At the end of the day, it is all about the skill and the investment approach of the manager.

Jerome Lander
November 21, 2014

Good article - thank you.

Indices - being momentum strategies by nature - tend to do well in strong upmarkets and make more prudent active managers look bad. Some active managers can and have looked good in upmarkets simply by having more risk on board.

There are many mediocre (and less than scrupulous) property managers and poorly informed retail investors investing in property stocks, enabling the very few skilful property managers to add value through a full cycle (that includes a downmarket!).

As you point out, a strong argument for some type of 'different than index' portfolio in property is the need to avoid concentration risk. The index can hardly be described as a diversified or efficient portfolio.

Low bond yields are likely to support property prices in Australia for sometime yet, particularly if we continue to achieve a mediocre yet not disastrous economy.


Leave a Comment:



State of play in listed real estate

Have A-REIT share prices bottomed out?

A-REITS are looking at M&A activity again


Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Latest Updates


How to enjoy your retirement

Amid thousands of comments, tips include developing interests to keep occupied, planning in advance to have enough money, stay connected with friends and the community ... should you defer retirement or just do it?


Results from our retirement experiences survey

Retirement is a good experience if you plan for it and manage your time, but freedom from money worries is key. Many retirees enjoy managing their money but SMSFs are not for everyone. Each retirement is different.


Why short-termism is both a travesty and an opportunity

On any given day, whether the stockmarket rises or falls is a coin toss, but stay invested for 10 years and the odds are excellent. It's at times of market selloffs that opportunities present for long-term investors.

Investment strategies

Fear is good if you are not part of the herd

If you feel fear when the market loses its head, you become part of the herd. Develop habits to embrace the fear. Identify the cause, decide if you need to take action and own the result without looking back. 

No excuses: Plan now for recession

The signs of a coming recession are building, especially in the US. In personal and business decisions, it's time to be more conservative and engage in risk management until some of the uncertainty is resolved. 


The fall of Volt Bank removes another bank competitor

The startup banks were supposed to challenge the lazy, oligopolistic major banks, but 86 400, Xinja and now Volt have gone. Why did Volt disappear so quickly when it had gained deposit support and name recognition?


Three main challenges to online ads and ‘surveillance capitalism’

Surveillance capitalism refers to the collection and use of consumer data to further profits. Will a renewed focus on privacy change the online-ad business model, or is it too entrenched?



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.