Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 183

Have A-REIT share prices bottomed out?

Record low bond yields have supported the valuations and profitability of Australian real estate investment trusts (A-REITs) over the past few years. A-REITs outperformed equities in 2014 (26.8% vs 5.3%) and 2015 (14.4% vs 2.8%).

The A-REIT/bonds correlation has been about -0.5% in 2016 (Figure 1), one of the highest on record. As a result, A-REIT prices have been driven down more by bond yield movements than other factors such as the real estate cycle.

Figure 1: 10 Year Bond Yields & A-REIT Total Returns: 12 Months to 31 October 2016

In recent months the yield curve has steepened as markets embrace increased fiscal stimulus from China and Japan and now the US (following Donald Trump’s election victory), and greater expectations of higher global inflation. Australian bond yields have followed, rising from a low of 1.8% in August 2016 to 2.3% at the end of October 2016. Since then, they’ve risen a further 0.40% to 2.7%.

Property trust prices continue to fall

This year, what was looking like another solid period for A-REITs is in danger of evaporating. Since the start of August, the sector has fallen 18.7% and is now down 2.8% YTD, while equity prices are up marginally YTD.

A-REITs aren’t alone. Global listed REITs in the US, UK, Singapore, and Hong Kong are down, while listed infrastructure and utilities equities have also been sold off.

Figure 2 ranks A-REITs in terms of price performance since August 2016. The largest have been hit the hardest – Scentre (SCG down 24.0%), Westfield (WFD down 20.9%), Vicinity (VCX down 20.9%), GPT (GPT down 20.6%) and Stockland (SGP down 20.1%) at time of writing.

In the hunt for yield, these large cap A-REITs have been well supported in recent years by generalist equity funds who have taken advantage of the liquidity they offer to park their money there. It is therefore not surprising that when the herd stampeded towards the exit then switched into more cyclical, growth-oriented stocks, the largest, most liquid A-REITs were hit hard.

Figure 2: A-REIT Price Movements, 1 August to 16 November 2016

With the recent sell-off, the A-REIT dividend yield has risen from 4.2% in July to 5.3%, but there is still a cushion of 260bps relative to the 2.7% 10-yr bond yield, which is above the long-term average of a 196bps spread.

The current yield is based on an average payout ratio of 84%, well below the 100% recorded pre-GFC, not that one wants to see A-REITs go back to those dark old days to boost their distribution yield.

The A-REIT sector is now trading at a price to NTA premium of circa 14%, down from 50% in July. There have been seven periods over the past 25 years when bond yields rose by more than 60 basis points. Figure 3 shows the performance of A-REITs relative to equities in each of these periods.

Figure 3: A-REIT and Equities Performance in Periods of Rising Bond Yields

A-REITs produced positive returns in only one period of rising bond yields (January–November 1994), a period when A-REITs also outperformed equities.

This time round we’ve seen the largest A-REIT sell-off compared with other periods of rising bond yields, despite the fact that bond yields have not risen as much as they did in 1998–2000 and December 2008–July 2009.

The extent of the recent sell-off is not surprising given the level to which bond yields fell and A-REIT prices rose. The dramatic bond sell-off over a short period has affected many yield-sensitive investments, and A-REITs have not been immune.

Will the pendulum swing back?

The question investors need to ask is whether the rapid rise in bonds will continue and A-REIT prices fall further, or has the pendulum swung too far, too quickly?

The A-REIT sector will remain captive to the gyrations of capital markets in the short term. Clearly, if bond yields continue to rise further there could be additional price risk.

However, the recent sell-off in the A-REIT sector has created some attractive buying opportunities. Investors with a longer-term view who can see out the short-term volatility can acquire some of the best real estate in Australia at more attractive prices than they could have three or four months ago.

Overall, A-REITs are in relatively good shape and almost incomparable to those in the lead up to the GFC. Gearing is lower (circa 30%), refinancing risk over the next few years is low (the majority of debt is due to expire in 2021 and beyond), asset quality has significantly improved, payout ratios are respectable and the exposure to offshore real estate is limited (Goodman and Westfield are the two exceptions).

Yet now is not the time to take a passive approach to the sector (i.e. indexing). We expect the variation of performance across the A-REIT universe to widen in the year ahead. Individual characteristics of each A-REIT will be more of a key performance driver than it has been in the past year or so.

Investors need to focus on those A-REITs that have quality management and can generate real value from their portfolios rather than simply relying on lower debt costs to support earnings and firming cap rates (property yields) to drive underlying asset values higher. As Warren Buffet says, “Only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked.”

 

Adrian Harrington is Head of Funds Management at Folkestone Limited (ASX:FLK). Folkestone is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   24 November 2016
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

State of play in listed real estate

The case for active management in A-REITs

A-REITS are looking at M&A activity again

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Building a lazy ETF portfolio in 2026

What are the best ways to build a simple portfolio from scratch? I’ve addressed this issue before but think it’s worth revisiting given markets and the world have since changed, throwing up new challenges and things to consider.

Get set for a bumpy 2026

At this time last year, I forecast that 2025 would likely be a positive year given strong economic prospects and disinflation. The outlook for this year is less clear cut and here is what investors should do.

Meg on SMSFs: First glimpse of revised Division 296 tax

Treasury has released draft legislation for a new version of the controversial $3 million super tax. It's a significant improvement on the original proposal but there are some stings in the tail.

Ray Dalio on 2025’s real story, Trump, and what’s next

The renowned investor says 2025’s real story wasn’t AI or US stocks but the shift away from American assets and a collapse in the value of money. And he outlines how to best position portfolios for what’s ahead.

10 fearless forecasts for 2026

The predictions include dividends will outstrip growth as a source of Australian equity returns, US market performance will be underwhelming, while US government bonds will beat gold.

13 million spare bedrooms: Rethinking Australia’s housing shortfall

We don’t have a housing shortage; we have housing misallocation. This explores why so many bedrooms go unused, what’s been tried before, and five things to unlock housing capacity – no new building required.

Latest Updates

3 ways to fix Australia’s affordability crisis

Our cost-of-living pressures go beyond the RBA: surging house prices, excessive migration, and expanding government programs, including the NDIS, are fuelling inflation, demanding bold, structural solutions.

Superannuation

The Division 296 tax is still a quasi-wealth tax

The latest draft legislation may be an improvement but it still has the whiff of a wealth tax about it. The question remains whether a golden opportunity for simpler and fairer super tax reform has been missed.

Superannuation

Is it really ‘your’ super fund?

Your super isn’t a bank account you own; it’s a trust you merely benefit from. So why would the Division 296 tax you personally on assets, income and gains you legally don’t own?

Shares

Inflation is the biggest destroyer of wealth

Inflation consistently undermines wealth, even in low-inflation environments. Whether or not it returns to target, investors must protect portfolios from its compounding impact on future living standards.

Shares

Picking the next sector winner

Global equity markets have experienced stellar returns in 2024 and 2025 led, in large part, by the boom in AI. Which sector could be the next star in global markets? This names three future winners.

Infrastructure

What investors should expect when investing in infrastructure: yield

The case for listed infrastructure is built on stable earnings and cash flows, which have sustained 4% dividend yields across cycles and supported consistent, inflation-linked long-term returns.

Investment strategies

Valuing AI: Extreme bubble, new golden era, or both

The US stock market sits in prolonged bubble territory, driven by AI enthusiasm. History suggests eventual mean reversion, reminding investors to weigh potential risks against current market optimism.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.