Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 198

Catch-up contributions are a tax planning opportunity

As part of the latest superannuation reforms, from 1 July 2018 individuals with a total superannuation balance of less than $500,000 before the beginning of the financial year will be able to make ‘catch-up’ concessional superannuation contributions.

These individuals will be able to access their unused prior years’ concessional contributions cap (that is, the amount by which those contributions are less than $25,000) on a rolling basis for five years and claim a tax deduction for those contributions in the year in which they are made. Any unused concessional contributions cap for the year will expire after five years.

The aim of the measure is to make it easier for people with interrupted work patterns, and with varying capacity to save over periods of time, to accumulate wealth in superannuation and gain access to the same tax concessions as those people who have regular and steady work patterns and income.

Reform offers planning opportunity

It also provides a planning opportunity. By deferring concessional contributions to a year in which an individual’s taxable income is higher, and making them as ‘catch-up’ contributions in the year when they are in the higher tax bracket, they will be able to create a larger tax arbitrage between tax at the super fund level and tax at the personal level. An example illustrates the point.

Dennis is a consultant operating as a sole practitioner. It is June 2019 and his taxable income for the 2019 year will be $80,000. He has not made any superannuation contributions for the year and has a superannuation balance of $300,000. Dennis expects that his taxable income in 2020 will be $165,000 higher because of a net capital gain that he is likely to crystallise due to the disposal of an investment property that he has just put on the market. That is, his taxable income in 2020 will be $245,000.

If Dennis makes a concessional contribution of $25,000 to his super fund in June 2019 and then another $25,000 in 2020 he will create a total tax arbitrage of $12,375. This could be considered a ‘standard’ contribution pattern.

In 2019, his personal taxable income will go from $80,000 to $55,000 and his tax will reduce from $17,547 (not including Medicare levy or small business tax discounts to which he might be entitled) to $9,422. A saving of $8,125 in personal income tax.

His super fund will pay tax of $3,750.

In 2020, his personal taxable income will go from $245,000 to $220,000 and his tax will reduce from $84,782 (not including Medicare levy or small business tax discounts to which he might be entitled) to $73,032. A saving of $11,750 in personal income tax.

His super fund will again pay tax of $3,750.

$8,125 + $11,750 - $3,750 - $3,750 = a $12,375 tax arbitrage.

How catch-ups will work

If Dennis defers the 2019 concessional contribution and makes a catch-up contribution in 2020 (along with the $25,000 allowed for that year) then Dennis will create a tax arbitrage of $16,000.

There is no personal tax saving in 2019. And no tax at the super fund level.

However, in 2020, his taxable income will go from $245,000 to $195,000 and his tax will reduce from $84,782 (not including Medicare levy or small business tax discounts to which he might be entitled) to $61,282. A saving of $23,500 in personal income tax.

His super fund will pay tax of $7,500.

$23,500 – $7,500 = a $16,000 tax arbitrage. $3,625 more than the standard approach of making the maximum $25,000 in each year.

By deferring the superannuation contribution from 2019 until 2020, the tax rate arbitrage goes from 17.5% (32.5% – 15%) to 32% (47% – 15%). The extra 14.5% arbitrage on the $25,000 catch-up concessional contribution amounts to $3,625.

Same amount in super with less tax

Under a 'standard' contribution pattern, over the three years, Dennis will get $75,000 into super with $16,750 in total tax arbitrage.

Under a 'catch-up and reserve' strategy, over two years Dennis will get $75,000 into super with $23,000 in total tax arbitrage.

Denis has created a 30% return, in two years, on his $75,000 contribution.

The strategy will work best where there is a large jump in taxable income from one year to the next resulting in changing tax brackets. Taxpayers would need to know that their taxable income in subsequent years is going to be (much?) higher than the current year.

And, of course, there is the risk that waiting to make catch-up contributions could back-fire if the taxable income drops or the catch-up contributions bring the taxpayer into a lower tax bracket in the catch-up year than they were in in the previous year. Or, indeed, if future government generosity leads to the lowering of the marginal tax rates or expanding of the lower tax brackets or the rules change.

But circumstances could arise where taxpayers will know with a degree of certainty that their taxable income will jump up in a particular year (and then maybe fall again). For example, as in the above scenario where a property is being prepared for sale which will finalise in a later year. Or where a person is party to an option contract which, upon exercise, will result in the disposal of a CGT asset at a price which the person knows will result in a taxable capital gain. Or large dividends might be paid from private companies.

In such circumstances, a person might wish to consider deferring concessional contributions and make them as catch-up contributions in the year when the taxable income increases to maximise the total tax arbitrage. Don’t forget, though, the savings are tied up in super.

 

Stephen Lawrence is a Lecturer, Taxation and Business Law School, UNSW, Chartered Accountant and Member of the International Tax Planning Association. These views are considered an accurate interpretation of regulations at the time of writing but are not made in the context of any investor’s personal circumstances.


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Super changes, the Budget and 2021 versus 2022

The $1.6 million cap … an unlucky break for the lucky few

Where is superannuation research heading?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.