Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 111

What is robo-advice?

The term robo-advice is now widely used within wealth management circles, but exactly what does it mean? If that question was directed to someone on the street corner their response would be more likely to include R2-D2 or C-3PO rather than a computer telling the user how they should invest their money to achieve their financial goals.

Wikipedia defines robo-advisors as “a class of financial adviser that provides portfolio management online with minimal human intervention. While their recommendations may vary, they all employ algorithms.”

The key words there are portfolio management and algorithms. Portfolio management indicates it has something to do with investing while the algorithm component refers to “a finite set of instructions that can be performed in a prescribed sequence to achieve a certain goal and has a recognisable set of end conditions.” (Source:

Split robo-advice into three groups

The term robo-advice has quickly evolved to cover a broad range of automated advice and investment solutions. But the underlying principle is the use of a formula or set of rules to assist a customer in finding the optimal approach to their investments, savings, retirement, or protection of assets. In practical terms, robo-advice can be split into three distinct groups and each has tremendous application for wealth managers and their customers.

A.  Fully automated non-discretionary investment advice

This refers to an individual subscribing to wealth guidance and advice that is implemented without the customer’s explicit consent. Managed accounts fit this definition and dealer group model portfolios could probably be put here as well, particularly if the portfolio is rebalanced periodically without customer consent at each rebalance. The main distinction between these investment approaches and the new crop of robo-advice offerings is that the new kids on the block advise the customer which fund or portfolio to invest in. Traditional managed accounts, on the other hand, rely on an adviser to select the initial portfolio based on their clients’ personal circumstances and appetite for risk.

The new breed of automated investment solutions still apply the principles of diversification, passive investing and regular rebalancing. Many also offer extended tools, including tax lot harvesting, to optimise capital gains tax outcomes. What really sets them apart though is an intuitive, clearly-defined and consistent investment approach which resonates with experienced and novice investors alike. As these solutions continue to innovate, they will increasingly appeal to a wider audience.

B.  Self-service investment and financial advice

This group provides digital tools to support customers in identifying, scoping and creating wealth advice and guidance, typically in relation to a specific goal or range of goals such as an income stream in retirement or saving for education. They may use behavioural finance techniques to encourage customers to regularly monitor and contribute to their wealth journey. Some of these tools build on this even further by streamlining the goal setting process and providing default goals and timings.

The main difference between these robo-advisors and the automated investment options is that they optimise and allocate cash flow across goals. In Australia, optimising across goals is particularly difficult given the complexity of our income tax and superannuation systems. As an example, one question that sounds simple but is quite difficult for robo-advisors to answer could be whether a client should make voluntary contributions into superannuation or pay down the mortgage. If a robo-advisor can’t answer this fundamental question, then chances are it optimises on investment and not on strategy.

What makes these types of robo-advisors even more compelling is the aggregation of client data. This enhances the user experience and removes unnecessary friction from the goal setting process. Where the wealth manager already has personal and investment data for the user, it can be integrated into the tool. Alternatively, the front end tool could request the user’s various account details. This gives the robo-advisor a powerful advantage as it can link all the accounts together, monitor movements in the investments and track ongoing progress towards goals. At the very least, the robo-advisor could apply basic user information, such as their age and suburb, and provide an estimate of their income, expenses and assets.

C.  Guided investment and financial advice

This option is typically focused on holistic strategies. It includes traditional face-to-face advice as well as remote advice delivered over the phone or by video. It also includes omni-channel advice, where a person is involved or ultimately responsible for the advice strategy.

There are a number of services available which provide online tools and access to a financial adviser for a one-off initiation fee and low monthly charge. The providers have embraced a user friendly and simplified approach to the financial advice process, with some even offering automated investment advice supported by a real financial adviser.

Robo-advisors versus real financial advisers

Will robo-advisors replace real financial advisers? The answer is, probably not. The more likely scenario is that robo-advisors will complement the work done by real financial advisers.

There is a huge gap between what regular households are willing to pay for advice and what advisers are willing to charge for advice. Robo-advisors will help to bridge that gap.

Where the two worlds are more likely to collide is in an adviser-led robo-advice tool becoming part of a dealer groups’ sales process. This has real merit and could revolutionise financial advice in Australia based on the principles of customer centricity, connectivity, contemporariness and compliance.

Adviser led robo-advice tools could help to close the gap around perceived quality of advice. The ASIC report 279 - Shadow Shopping Study of Retirement Advice found that 39% of advice examples were poor and failed to meet the requirements of S945A. Yet, in the same study, 86% of mystery shopper participants felt they had received good quality advice. From ASIC’s standpoint, adviser-led robo-advice tools could significantly improve the quality of advice. If customers continue to rate quality highly and ASIC starts seeing measurable improvements, the wealth management industry and financial advice profession will benefit in the long run.


Jeroen Buwalda is EY’s Asia-Pacific wealth and asset management advisory leader.

The views expressed in this article are the views of the author, not Ernst & Young. The article provides general information, does not constitute advice and should not be relied on as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.


Rashmi H Mehrotra
June 03, 2015

It's useful to think about the points in the value chain we need automation.

Risk profiling? I am still skeptical of the notion of risk profile, at least as a number like IQ, let alone there being a right method of some questions being able to deduct it. How does anyone know how they will react to an event they have never experienced before? While automated questions are great, I think good advisers use them to guide discussions.

Goal calculators? Ok it's useful to have calculators converting my dreams to dollars - assuming reasonable assumptions have been put in.

Asset allocation? I am not sure to how to automate SAA without selecting model (mean-variance anyone?), assumptions, limits, choice of asset classes... Institutional investors use subjective overlays because they know models don't work - why subject retail investors to that illusion?

Re-balancing? Sure automation is good

Fund selection? Haven't we proven past performance, and therefore star ratings, don't work? So we select from a qualitatively pre-vetted list

With all these limitations, what are we automating? Aren't we just serving up pre-designed model portfolios? If so, isn't the least thing we can do is hand-hold retail investors who are fearful of markets? I think advisers are very useful to educate and coach...and therefore needed.

Andrew Connors
June 01, 2015

Financial advisers will most definitely have their place in the future. As a provider of Robo Advice applications pitched at Financial Advisers, we think the best form of advice will be a combination of Robo capability and face to face interaction. Robo tools can't substitute the holistic advice provided by financial advisers however it can certainly introduce greater efficiencies around the automation of investment strategy selection and management.

Advisers can no longer expect banks and industry funds to ignore the advice needs of their members, increasingly these groups will look to directly provide this service to stem the drain of pension members who seek advice outside of these large institutions.

Advisers wishing to compete in this space need to look at ways they can offer their services in an efficient and effective manor.

The good news is that with the right applications, advisers CAN offer a differentiated service and even grow their pipeline of clients.

Andrew Connors

Daniel Knight
May 29, 2015

The term "roboadvice" was coined in the US, where fund managers are often called investment advisors. Here, "robomanager" would be a much better description (particularly categories A and B described in the article).

Shirley Chu
May 29, 2015

It seems that Robo-advice ensures that the advice given can meet a certain level of quality.

Donald Hellyer
May 29, 2015

Robo advise will democratise wealth management. 80% of adult Australians do not have a financial planner, mainly because they don't want to pay $2000+ per year. Most financial advice is in one way shape or form formulaic. Financial advice can be codified into software and the marginal cost of providing the service will plummet. My predication is that a user's first financial plan will be free within 2 - 3 years.

May 30, 2015

I agree - a machine can do most of the process and probably better. A machine can crunch enormous amounts of info instantly and should have an advantage over an adviser paid to push a product.

Questions remain about how the machine chooses a product. Is it programmed to favour certain providers? Does it look at the whole universe of products? Is there an 'approved list' the algorithm chooses from and if so how is that list constructed?

I am sure people will be doing their own plan (with product selection) well within 2 years. SMSFs have shown Australians have both the inclination and aptitude to do their own retirement planning. Gen X and Y are comfortable relying on information they get from the we. Even Boomers are becoming rapidly computer literate.

Complicated advice will always need a 'human' and the banks will always be able to sucker customers into their planning service.

Kenny Thing
May 29, 2015

Very good summary on robo advisory. Democratization of financial services eg "A" to a wider group of customer is a benefit of FinTech. Robo advisor will not replace traditional advisor overnight but those who adopt some form of robo advisory will certainly differentiate from those who do not.


Leave a Comment:



Roboadvice's role in financial advice’s future

Lessons for roboadvice in Centrelink debacle

Will roboadvice exterminate traditional advisers?


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.