Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 211

3 difficulties investing in emerging markets

Investing in emerging markets is fraught with complex challenges and dealing with them calls for a new approach based on sustainability. Traditional fundamental analysis and quant models have come up short.

Investors encounter three key problems: the negative impact of state-owned enterprises (SOEs); a lack of emphasis on good governance and sustainability; and high fees and index constraints.

1. Alignment of interests by SOEs

State-owned enterprises, which make up about 30% of the emerging markets benchmark, usually have different objectives to minority investors. Investors need to understand whether their interests are aligned because shareholder wealth creation reduces risk and increases returns.

According to a report in The Economist, the SOEs among the world’s top 500 companies lost between 33% and 37% of their value between 2007 and 2014. Global shares rose by 5% over the period. The root of the problem, according to The Economist, is a “huge misallocation of capital.” With little need to meet the expectations of investors, SOEs invested trillions of dollars in non-core businesses that did not pay off. SOEs are also stingy when it comes to paying dividends and many have debt problems.

2. Poor governance and inadequate stewardship

Companies with poor governance and sustainability practices add cost to their operations. As a result, they have less capital for investment and less that can be distributed to shareholders. We believe ESG (Environment, Social and Governance) in emerging markets is under-researched and gives us a competitive advantage that adds value.

The single most important ESG factor is governance. Governance issues include audit quality, compensation policies, board independence, capital discipline, related party transactions, management quality, past violations and controversies involving the company.

There is strong evidence of the positive role governance plays in driving superior financial and market performance, while lowering risk. In 2012, Deutsche Bank compiled research on more than 100 global studies on the merits of ESG. The studies found that companies with high ESG ratings have lower capital costs. The most important factor was governance, with an emphasis on stewardship of capital. Harvard Business School published research in 2015 (Serafein et al) which concluded: “We find that firms with strong ratings on material sustainability issues have better future performance than firms with inferior ratings on the same issues.”

Company sustainability reports and third-party research to assess the transparency and integrity of company disclosures are also important. We place the company’s environmental and social practices in their industry context and seek to identify cases of ‘greenwashing’.

3. Fees and difficulties constructing a good index

Quant funds have yet to make meaningful inroads into ESG investing in emerging markets. The available data sets are relatively immature and there are reliability issues resulting from the wide variability of company reporting. It can be difficult to compare companies on a like-for-like basis. It is expensive to source data in emerging markets which can often be corrupted by companies using ‘greenwashing’ and other techniques to disguise the true nature of their business practices.

There seems to be a price at which an active fundamental investment manager will tolerate certain poor qualities, hiding under the veils of ‘it being discounted into the price’ or ‘growth cures all problems’. There is a tendency to interpret information in a way that confirms already held preconceptions.

Sustainability issues often take a secondary role to price, growth and risk management considerations. Other investment managers look at valuations and short-term earnings expectations, and if they see a good deal they will explain away poor governance practices.

Index management is not a viable solution in emerging markets either, due to two fundamentally disqualifying facts mentioned above: the role of SOEs and the pervasive influence of poorly-governed companies. The inconsistent application of the rule of law across disparate geographies and weak sustainability practices ensure poor long-term returns from many companies represented by the benchmark.

 

Craig Mercer is Co-founder and Chief Investment Officer of Remerga. Remerga emphasises corporate governance and sustainability in the emerging markets. Remerga’s Emerging Markets Sustainable Leaders Fund does not hold any state-owned enterprises. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   20 July 2017
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Beyond the acronym, navigating important ESG choices

Investment learnings from the COVID-19 crisis

Is it a myth that 'purpose' can drive corporate profits?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.