Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 211

3 difficulties investing in emerging markets

Investing in emerging markets is fraught with complex challenges and dealing with them calls for a new approach based on sustainability. Traditional fundamental analysis and quant models have come up short.

Investors encounter three key problems: the negative impact of state-owned enterprises (SOEs); a lack of emphasis on good governance and sustainability; and high fees and index constraints.

1. Alignment of interests by SOEs

State-owned enterprises, which make up about 30% of the emerging markets benchmark, usually have different objectives to minority investors. Investors need to understand whether their interests are aligned because shareholder wealth creation reduces risk and increases returns.

According to a report in The Economist, the SOEs among the world’s top 500 companies lost between 33% and 37% of their value between 2007 and 2014. Global shares rose by 5% over the period. The root of the problem, according to The Economist, is a “huge misallocation of capital.” With little need to meet the expectations of investors, SOEs invested trillions of dollars in non-core businesses that did not pay off. SOEs are also stingy when it comes to paying dividends and many have debt problems.

2. Poor governance and inadequate stewardship

Companies with poor governance and sustainability practices add cost to their operations. As a result, they have less capital for investment and less that can be distributed to shareholders. We believe ESG (Environment, Social and Governance) in emerging markets is under-researched and gives us a competitive advantage that adds value.

The single most important ESG factor is governance. Governance issues include audit quality, compensation policies, board independence, capital discipline, related party transactions, management quality, past violations and controversies involving the company.

There is strong evidence of the positive role governance plays in driving superior financial and market performance, while lowering risk. In 2012, Deutsche Bank compiled research on more than 100 global studies on the merits of ESG. The studies found that companies with high ESG ratings have lower capital costs. The most important factor was governance, with an emphasis on stewardship of capital. Harvard Business School published research in 2015 (Serafein et al) which concluded: “We find that firms with strong ratings on material sustainability issues have better future performance than firms with inferior ratings on the same issues.”

Company sustainability reports and third-party research to assess the transparency and integrity of company disclosures are also important. We place the company’s environmental and social practices in their industry context and seek to identify cases of ‘greenwashing’.

3. Fees and difficulties constructing a good index

Quant funds have yet to make meaningful inroads into ESG investing in emerging markets. The available data sets are relatively immature and there are reliability issues resulting from the wide variability of company reporting. It can be difficult to compare companies on a like-for-like basis. It is expensive to source data in emerging markets which can often be corrupted by companies using ‘greenwashing’ and other techniques to disguise the true nature of their business practices.

There seems to be a price at which an active fundamental investment manager will tolerate certain poor qualities, hiding under the veils of ‘it being discounted into the price’ or ‘growth cures all problems’. There is a tendency to interpret information in a way that confirms already held preconceptions.

Sustainability issues often take a secondary role to price, growth and risk management considerations. Other investment managers look at valuations and short-term earnings expectations, and if they see a good deal they will explain away poor governance practices.

Index management is not a viable solution in emerging markets either, due to two fundamentally disqualifying facts mentioned above: the role of SOEs and the pervasive influence of poorly-governed companies. The inconsistent application of the rule of law across disparate geographies and weak sustainability practices ensure poor long-term returns from many companies represented by the benchmark.

 

Craig Mercer is Co-founder and Chief Investment Officer of Remerga. Remerga emphasises corporate governance and sustainability in the emerging markets. Remerga’s Emerging Markets Sustainable Leaders Fund does not hold any state-owned enterprises. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Beyond the acronym, navigating important ESG choices

Investment learnings from the COVID-19 crisis

Is it a myth that 'purpose' can drive corporate profits?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.