Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 189

A robo response: digital wealth advice will engage at all levels

Graham’s Centrelink/robo analogy raises a valuable point that if the fact-find has deficiencies, then the outcome is likely sub-optimal. I think the analogy is a bit too harsh in that the Centrelink issue was a ‘behind the screen’ data matching problem. That is, it didn’t ask the end client for any input about their current circumstances. However, there is no reason why a computer interface can’t ask the relevant questions, it simply relies on the smart minds coding the programme to be given the right instructions. The first versions of digital wealth managers (robo 1.0 if you like) do have online fact-finds that engage the client (albeit there is a range of depth to these).

Robo 1.0 as a ‘fund of funds’

The robo 1.0 advisers are a ‘fund of funds’ approach via an online interface. Fund of funds investment models have been around for decades (in human form) and the robo 1.0’s that I have seen are simply a better – that is, rigorous, lower cost, and convenient – approach to what was previously done via pencil and calculator. Think of it as applying statistics to what was previously predominated by ‘gut feel’, much like the Oakland A’s Billy Beane’s approach to using statistics in the selection of baseball players to drive the A’s to the top of the league (popularised in the Michael Lewis book, Moneyball). This approach of statistics and rigour to selection is now widespread across professional sports because it worked.

Robo 1.0 sits as a viable alternative to consider alongside any other fund manager choice. At its core, it uses the power of passive indexing and academic research that shows up to 90% of portfolio volatility is explained by asset class selection. It concentrates on diversification across asset classes, and within an asset class, via the index fund (or more likely Exchange Traded Funds or ETFs) selection. It is relatively safe and dependable for those who take a ‘set and forget’ long-term approach to their portfolio.

One of the drawbacks of this approach is the fact that you need to liquidate your current portfolio, and send the money to the robo to invest into the underlying basket of ETFs (a fund of funds structure). This liquidation means incurring any relevant capital gains taxes. This is perhaps why the client skew is heavily toward millennials. They are early in their investment journey where this capital gains hurdle isn’t such a barrier to adoption.

Robo evolution, technology and humans

You shouldn’t think this is the end of the robo technology story. Consumers of all services are increasingly comfortable with the benefits technology can bring. It is perhaps better to view the ‘robo’ industry through the lens of the mobile phone industry. Robos are probably past brick phones and are up to at least flip phones, not yet at, but rapidly heading toward, smart phones (remember even before the iPhone 7 came six generations of iPhones!). Technology moves forward and looks to solve consumer pain points.

The digital wealth advice (robo) industry is evolving as well. It is rapidly moving more to ‘human augmented advice’ rather than resting on its laurels at fund of funds via ETFs. This means it is moving to a process-automation approach, and this approach is best delivered through a hybrid model – human assisted digital wealth advice rigour if you like. This model is exemplified by Vanguard in the US where they have had overwhelming success. The client numbers and funds onto their platform via their human assisted approach is testament to this.

Others such as Schwab, Merrill, UBS, Raymond James and even Wealthfront and Betterment have either launched or announced plans to launch human adviser assisted ‘robo’ offerings into the US market. Yes, human augmented is most likely where it all starts to really impact the industry. The Vanguard Personal Advisor Services model is delivered via a call centre approach rather than traditional face to face meetings. Smart phone video call technology is accelerating this trend. It includes the cost efficiencies of an ETF approach, but coupled with the ability to interact with a human for that ‘sounding board’, confidence and discussion regarding specific personal nuances.

The Vanguard approach still has the limitation of being a fund of funds model, so the liquidation on entry issue isn’t solved. The best of breed will be those that can handle legacy assets, in other words, look at a current portfolio as it stands and give advice about how to ‘fix it up’ whilst minimising costs. Think of it as the mass customisation of portfolio advice, or individually-advised accounts at scale. Computers are excellent at this sort of problem solving, especially when boundaries are set by a human operator.

In my opinion, the reason for the human-augmented model success is the blending of a lower cost with the ability for the human adviser to perform the role of investment and planning coach. Often this is as much about psychology of the investor, which the industry is now calling ‘gamma’ (ie beta = market risk, alpha = selection risk, gamma = emotive risks, or the behavioural biases that affect your investing. Computers are methodical, they don’t do gamma well (except in sci-fi movies).

Where do I think the industry will get to?

Like everything in business, the winning approach is the one that produces the most convenient customer experience of the desired quality at the lowest price point. The ‘experience’ a consumer wants in advice varies over time depending upon the advice needs. Sometimes it is just portfolio rebalancing, at other times it is more strategic around estate planning, tax strategies or establishing investment vehicles.

I expect to find the professional practice of the future to include all three levels of engagement under one roof. Online 24/7 self-serve for simple matters I can do myself, video call for when I feel comfortable but want a sounding board, and face-to-face for when I have a complex issue and I want to talk through scenarios.

At all three levels the core will be an ‘advice engine’ (the robo) that does the donkey work (hat tip Chris Cuffe for that term) of number crunching cost effectively.

Digital wealth advisers (the politically correct name for ‘robos’) will be an integral part of the future – just like smart phones – but that future is also most likely to be embedded into a human assisted overlay. People engage best with people.

 

John O’Connell is Chief Investment Officer at Macquarie BFS and Founder, OwnersAdvisory by Macquarie, a digital wealth adviser and a sponsor of Cuffelinks.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Lessons for roboadvice in Centrelink debacle

Online wealth advice is a reality

FoFA, the Failure of Financial Advice, Take 2

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Three steps to planning your spending in retirement

What happens when a superannuation expert sets up his own retirement portfolio using decades of knowledge? He finds he can afford much more investment risk in his portfolio than conventional thinking suggests.

Finding sustainable dividend stocks on the ASX

There is a small universe of companies on the ASX which are reliable dividend payers over five years, are fairly valued and are classified as ‘negligible’ or ‘low’ on both ESG risk and carbon risk.

Among key trends in Australian banks, one factor stands out

The Big Four banks look similar but they are at fundamentally different stages as they move to simpler business models. Amid challenges from operating systems, loan growth and neobank threats, one factor stands tall.

Why mega-tech growth are the best ‘value’ stocks in the market

They are six of the greatest businesses ever and should form part of the global portfolios of all investors. The market sees risk in inflation and valuations but the companies are positioned for outstanding growth.

How inflation impacts different types of investments

A comprehensive study of the impact of inflation on returns from different assets over the past 120 years. The high returns in recent years are due to low inflation and falling rates but this ‘sweet spot’ is ending.

How to manage the run down in your income in retirement

The first of five articles on modern retirement income products that aim for an increasing pension that lasts for life and on average should not decline in real terms. They are not silver bullets but worth a look.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Retirement income promise relies on spending capital

The Government has taken the next step towards encouraging retirees to live off their capital, and from 1 July 2022 will require super funds - even SMSFs - to address retirement income and protect longevity risk.

Superannuation

How retirees might find a retirement solution in future

Superannuation funds need to establish a framework that offers retirees a retirement income solution that lasts a lifetime. It will challenge trustees to find a way to engage that their members understand and trust.

Investment strategies

Dividend investors, your turn is coming

Dividend payments from listed companies, depended on by many in retirement, have lagged the rebound in share prices over the past year. Better times are ahead but sources of dividends will differ from previous years.

Investment strategies

Four tips to catch the next 10-bagger in early-stage growth

Small cap investors face less mature companies with zero profit that need significant capital for growth. Without years of financial data to rely on, investors must employ creative ways to value companies.

Investment strategies

Investing in Japan: ready for an Olympic revival?

All eyes are on Japan and the opportunity to win for competing athletes. After disappointing investors for many years, Japan is also in focus for its value, diversification and the safe haven status of its currency.

Fixed interest

Five lessons for bond investors from the Virgin collapse

The collapse of Virgin Australia not only hit shareholders, but their bond investors received between 9 and 13 cents in the $1. A widely-diversified portfolio can tolerate losses better than a concentrated one.

Investment strategies

The 60:40 portfolio ... if no longer appropriate, then what is?

The traditional 60/40 portfolio might deliver only 1.5% above inflation in future without diversification benefits. Knowing an asset’s attributes rather than arbitrary definitions is better for investors.

Retirement

Two factors that can transform retirement investing

Retirees want better returns but they have limited appetite to dial up their risk exposure in order to achieve it. Financial advice and protection strategies in portfolios can enhance investment outcomes.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.