Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 107

Disruptive technology in banking

While banks have been focussing on getting ready for Basel 3 and dealing with legacy legal issues from the Global Financial Crisis, there has been a seismic shift happening under their noses. Technology companies without the same legacies who have world-leading brands, are customer savvy and have sizeable balance sheets are now adding banking products and financial services to their broad array of consumer services.

New players across many bank products

In a recent report, Macquarie noted that in 2006 Apple and Google had a combined market capitalisation of around $180 billion, broadly similar to JP Morgan and only 20% smaller than HSBC. They now have a combined market capitalisation of over $1 trillion, almost five times the size of either. In fact, Apple’s market cap is equivalent to approximately $100 for every person on the planet. But this is just Apple and Google. There are a raft of smaller players attacking financial services from every angle from on-line transactions, phone banking and peer to peer lending (P2P). Google (Google Wallet), Apple (Apple Pay) and Ebay (PayPal) have already taken their first step into financial services and there is every indication they will keep penetrating these markets given complacent incumbent players, above normal returns and huge cross sell opportunities.

Google Wallet and PayPal are ‘wallets’ which allow the user to store money transferred from a bank account, make payments by email or by touching the phone to an in-store reader. The service is secure and protects customer details. Google Wallet and PayPal are both considered to be much more user-friendly than many of the bank-owned apps that are on the market. As with much of what Google has done, it has purchased a smaller player with an innovative platform (Softcard) to enhance the offering. With its huge balance sheet, we expect Google to keep acquiring best of breed players to augment its market-leading offering across all facets of its business.

Apple Pay is an iPhone App that facilitates point of sale transactions, but it has to be linked to debit or credit cards. Apple Pay cannot store money itself. To use Apple Pay the phone has to be near the merchant reader and authenticated with a finger touch on the touch ID. Vibration confirms payment complete. Card numbers are not stored on the device, but rather a unique Device Account Number which is not backed up to cloud. Macquarie calculates that Apple Pay now counts for two of every three dollars spent via contactless payments on the US’s three largest card networks.

Threat from smartphones

Outside of the ‘big three’ payment offerings, smartphones have the ability to replace traditional banking products. Vodafone has launched M-Pesa which allows users to deposit, withdraw and transfer money with a mobile device. M-Pesa was first developed to provide an easy medium for micro-finance lenders to send funds to third world countries with limited bank branch networks. It is currently only used in limited markets but is being rolled out more broadly as the platform gains greater acceptance. Most importantly, M-Pesa provides an exchange link between physical and electronic cash. Macquarie believes that ultimately Google, Apple, Samsung, etc, will roll out affordable smartphones across all markets, with wallet-based functionality that offers all the benefits of M-Pesa based on a global infrastructure.

One of the largest growth areas has been P2P. P2P lending is where there is a ‘market place’ which connects borrowers and lenders. Whilst this market is only small, it is growing fast through payday lending and consumer loans. With interest rates low, P2P borrowers are paying lenders significantly more than what is available through bank deposits. However these loans are inherently higher risk than many of the loans the banks make and there is a risk that if there is a credit downturn this market could be short-lived. Lenders may not be prepared to take on credit risk if economic conditions worsen.

Major bank consumer lending markets are most at risk, while business banking is a little more specialised and less likely to be ‘disrupted’. Interestingly one of the leaders in this field is Lending Club, which is 8% owned by Google and already starting to enter partnerships to deliver new financing opportunities to specific Google partners.

Commoditised banking is a particular target

Commoditised retail banking products such as payments, credit cards and simple loans are ripe for the picking by the large technology companies using innovative solutions and strong brand recognition. Google and Apple are active in the banking channel and will continue to expand until they have scale positions. As penetration of the disrupters increases, there is heightened earnings risk for the retail banks. Some of the disrupters will fail, especially the newer players, but current bank share prices do not reflect the risk that the big technology companies and some smaller innovators will succeed.

Michael Birch is Head of Equities at Mason Stevens Limited

Warren Bird
May 04, 2015

The most effective 'disruption' will be in areas where alternative financial links between people and businesses does not increase risk or other key mismatches.

For example, linking individual depositors to individual borrowers is unlikely to make inroads. Matching the size and term of deposits to the size and maturity of borrowings is a complex business that the banks have significant expertise and experience in. Also, deposits are invested in the entire bank balance sheet, with credit risks spread and supported by capital, rather than the investor taking the risk of one or a small number of borrowers.

However, a service directly linking tourists looking to switch currencies may have more success. The transaction is once off and instant - my Euro buy your sterling off you and that's it. Provided the disrupting service charges a fee well inside the buy-sell spreads that the banks charge on FX transactions, there may be attractions using this. Of course, the banks could easily counter this threat by tightening those buy-sell spreads and/or by setting up exactly the same sort of service on their own platforms. The disruptor will need deep pockets to fight back against the price war that they will start.

May 01, 2015

I'd agree with Jerome, there is ample room for competition although the sting in the tail that we are all realising is that disruptive companies like the ones mentioned in the article need to be held accountable for tax in this country. For example the income once earned from classifieds in newspapers printed in Australia used to pay their fair much does Google now pay?? As more industries are transformed this is an issue we all have to face and address politically.

Jerome Lander
April 30, 2015

From the point of view of the Australian consumer - and perhaps the job creating parts of the Australian economy - disruption can't come soon enough to the oligopolistic Australian banking industry. The major banks have continued to grow their share of the Australian economy, arguably at the expense of other sectors of the economy and the real economy (ex-housing), while being preferentially served by government policy (to date). It is a world of financiers take all! Meanwhile, new enterprise - you know the type that works for a living rather than rent seeking - has been stifled and struggled to find adequate capital, certainly compared with the ability to get a loan to buy residential property! That said, the banks have very strong entrenched positions, and the ability to buy or out-compete certain types of competition, even as sluggish followers. This will be a very interesting space to watch.


Leave a Comment:



Business model disruption - Part 2

Is there an Uber or Amazon of wealth management?


Most viewed in recent weeks

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 433 with weekend update

There’s this story about a group of US Air Force generals in World War II who try to figure out ways to protect fighter bombers (and their crew) by examining the location of bullet holes on returning planes. Mapping the location of these holes, the generals quickly come to the conclusion that the areas with the most holes should be prioritised for additional armour.

  • 11 November 2021

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 431 with weekend update

House prices have risen at the fastest pace for 33 years, but what actually happened in 1988, and why is 2021 different? Here's a clue: the stockmarket crashed 50% between September and November 1987. Looking ahead, where did house prices head in the following years, 1989 to 1991?

  • 28 October 2021

Why has Australia slipped down the global super ranks?

Australia appears to be slipping from the pantheon of global superstar pension systems, with a recent report placing us sixth. A review of an earlier report, which had Australia in bronze position, points to some reasons why, and what might need to happen to regain our former glory.

How to help people with retirement spending decisions

Super funds will soon be required to offer retirement income strategies for members in decumulation. With uncertain returns, uncertain timelines, and different goals, it's possibly “the hardest, nastiest problem in finance".

Tips when taking large withdrawals from super

You want to take a lump sum from your super, but what's the best way? Should it come from you or your spouse, or the pension or accumulation account. There is a welcome flexibility to select the best outcome.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Charlie Munger and stock picks at the Sohn Conference

The Sohn Australia Conference brings together leading fund managers to chose their highest conviction stock in a 10-minute pitch. Here are their 2021 selections with Charlie Munger's wisdom as the star feature.


John Woods on diversification using asset allocation

All fund managers now claim to take ESG factors into account, but a multi-asset ethical fund will look quite different from a mainstream fund. Faced with low fixed income returns, alternatives have a bigger role.

SMSF strategies

Don't believe the SMSF statistics on investment allocation

The ATO's data on SMSF asset allocation is as much as 27 months out-of-date and categories such as cash and global investments are reported incorrectly. We should question the motives of some who quote the numbers.

Investment strategies

Highlights of reader tips for young investors

In this second part on the reader responses with advice to younger people, we have selected a dozen highlights, but there are so many quality contributions that a full list of comments is also attached.

Investment strategies

Four climate themes offer investors the next big thing

Climate-related companies will experience exponential growth driven by consumer demand and government action. Investors who identify the right companies will benefit from four themes which will last decades.

Investment strategies

Inflation remains transitory due to strong long-term trends

There is momentum to stop calling inflation 'transitory' but this overlooks deep-seated trends. A longer-term view will see companies like ARB, Reece, Macquarie Telecom and CSL more valuable in a decade.


Infrastructure and the road to recovery

Infrastructure assets experienced varying fortunes during the pandemic, from less travel at airports to strong activity in communications. On the road to recovery, what role does infrastructure play in a portfolio?


The three prices that everyone should worry about

Among the myriad of numbers that bombard us every day, three prices matter greatly to the world economy. Recent changes in these prices help to understand the potential for a global recovery and interest rates.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.